Dr. Shades wrote:No, they probably assumed that since you didn't deem it worth explaining, they needn't deem it worth clicking.
That's what I deemed.
It’s relatively easy to agree that only Homo sapiens can speak about things that don’t really exist, and believe six impossible things before breakfast. You could never convince a monkey to give you a banana by promising him limitless bananas after death in monkey heaven.
Bach wrote:And by the way, where are all these ladies here who ALWAYS speak out for the rights of women? Bad case of lock jaw going around I guess.
You're a friggin' troll on ignore. That's why.
Yep
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden ~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
My issue is that telling people what's on the other end of the link, why it's valuable, and what you hope they learn from it is a common courtesy to your readers so they can decide in advance whether it's worth their time to click and read.
"IT'S WORTH THEIR TIME"
Hey, you're the closest thing here to an entrepreneur in creating this board - so I respect your rules. But just had to ask an obvious reality point of irony: When one looks at the number of cumulative posts of those supporting your rule on this thread,finding a baseless way of avoiding the obvious issue, and using it as a basis of supporting you in moderating and not answering the obvious question contained in the article link (obviously opened many times) - how or why can it be time consuming, or even inconvenient to the very same posters who spend their life here?
Hard to reconcile your concern to the historical facts of reality of these same posters' time on this board.
My issue is that telling people what's on the other end of the link, why it's valuable, and what you hope they learn from it is a common courtesy to your readers so they can decide in advance whether it's worth their time to click and read.
"IT'S WORTH THEIR TIME"
Hey, you're the closest thing here to an entrepreneur in creating this board - so I respect your rules. But just had to ask an obvious reality point of irony: When one looks at the number of cumulative posts of those supporting your rule on this thread,finding a baseless way of avoiding the obvious issue, and using it as a basis of supporting you in moderating and not answering the obvious question contained in the article link (obviously opened many times) - how or why can it be time consuming, or even inconvenient to the very same posters who spend their life here?
Hard to reconcile your concern to the historical facts of reality of these same posters' time on this board.
But I digress into common sense.
For some common sense, how about you don't decide for people by announcing, in all caps, ITS WORTH THEIR TIME but still without giving any information. How presumptuous.
Last edited by Guest on Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
I didn't click on the link because “F” people who drop a link without context.
- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
