canpakes wrote:Subs -
I live in a border state where walls and tough fencing already exist, yet they are commonly breached, with a large amount of drug movement taking place via tunnels.
Just because people still commit murder does not mean that we should suddenly condone or let it go unpunished...so, i am not sure what your anecdotal point is here
canpakes wrote:You seem to be a practical fellow; can you give us some insight on the kind of return on this wall investment that we can expect? And how much will this wall stem the arguably more problematic drug trade that makes significant use of tunnels?
I am sure that both of us are ill-equipped to provide convincing "investment" data for the presence or absence of a wall....but I believe that it is incorrect to consider a wall in the same paradigm as a 401(k).
But, considering the data noted above, it would seem that a decrease in the "60%" (those without ever having visas) would encourage money, time, and efforts to be applied elsewhere.
The physical wall may seem rather primitive to you, but it seems that the "wall" is manifest in many forms - yet you do not seem to protest them as you do a "traditional" wall....perhaps it is your penchant for all things shiny and new, but sometimes it is practical to not re-invent the wheel.