Free Speech Under Attack.... by liberals abusing the Law.

[_ldsfaqs]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_OGhw5e-Qo

This demonstrates that liberals aren't going after actual "fraud" with the Oil Company's etc., they are in fact trying to silence different views and opinions, going after free speech itself and trying to put people in jail etc. for it.

Again, this shows clearly that liberals are Fascists, aren't interested in right and wrong, and "equality", they are only interested in compliance to their agenda and then destroying any way they can those who aren't and don't wish to be, or speaks against their agenda.

I would remind you that the liberals in power at the IRS have already abused their positions by going after Tea Party etc. groups.
A proven fact..... and there are many other examples of this.
Hillary Clinton abused the law, and yet she get's away with it while many others are in jail etc. for the same kinds of things she's done.
Many Whistleblowers are in jail by the Obama Admin. They want to put Snowden in Jail, on and on.

[_canpakes]

A proven fact.....

Here's a proven fact ... You are still unable, regardless of your strange claims otherwise in earlier threads, to point to any law or the text of the one that forced banks to give loans to poor people who would not otherwise qualify according to that bank's lending standards.

You have a very difficult time offering anything but BS to this audience.

[_ldsfaqs]

And more personal attacks instead of dealing with the content.

Further, as I've said a 100 times, I've provided the video's and resources, and pointed to how you can find them yourself.
Don't blame me because you have no actual intellectual and moral integrity to find the actual truth of things.

[_Lemmie]

And more personal attacks instead of dealing with the content.

Further, as I've said a 100 times, I've provided the video's and resources, and pointed to how you can find them yourself.
Don't blame me because you have no actual intellectual and moral integrity to find the actual truth of things.

If there were any content ever, people could deal with it. On the topic in question, I remember that thread; your videos [AND PLEASE NOTE THE USE OF A PLURAL WITHOUT AN APOSTROPHE, FOR THE THOUSANDTH TIME] and resources were completely debunked, and, as usual, you ran away from the thread without addressing any of questions or problems brought up, and without explaining your bogus references and your made up statistics for which you could never provide documentation.

As usual, you live up to your own quote from yesterday, which I fixed for you once:

This sort of thinking is how [I] think about everything, simplistic, ignorant, stupid, dangerous, destructive.

FTFY, again.

[_Jersey Girl]

Here's a proven fact ... You are still unable, regardless of your strange claims otherwise in earlier threads, to point to any law or the text of the one that forced banks to give loans to poor people who would not otherwise qualify according to that bank's lending standards.

You have a very difficult time offering anything but BS to this audience.

And more personal attacks instead of dealing with the content.

Further, as I've said a 100 times, I've provided the video's and resources, and pointed to how you can find them yourself.
Don't blame me because you have no actual intellectual and moral integrity to find the actual truth of things.

Those are not personal attacks.

The poster in the above, is challenging you to supply evidence of your assertions and noting that when asked repeatedly, you do not.

[_Jersey Girl]

Regarding your repeated cries of personal attack, Allen. That is a sign of one who is unable to support or adequately articulate a position. When you are challenged you cry personal attack.

Let me tell you something. You are almost always dealing here with posters who are far more educated, intelligent and articulate than you are. Lemmie, for example, can whip out statistical analysis in her sleep. EA, I couldn't match him on political knowledge if I tried. Instead of recognizing that you are surrounded by talented folks who are far more well informed on various topics than you are from who you can learn , you childishly spit in their collective faces.

These are not qualities of either a good teacher or devoted learner, and every teacher is both.

In many cases when your assertions have been challenged, instead of supplying links/quotes to material that you have covered, and articulating your knowledge in a civil way, you make outlandish and unrealistic claims of expertise for which we see no evidence. Speaking only for myself, there is perhaps on only one topic (that hardly ever comes up) on this board that I am equipped to address. And still, Allen, I do not consider myself an expert in that field.

We see no evidence of your knowledge in your posts or comments. What we see is that you are simply regurgitating what someone else has presented in a youtube video and making it your own. If you knew your topical areas, if you had truly researched in depth, you'd be able to present an articulate response to questions and challenges.

What we get from you, is spitting.

Again, all teachers are devoted learners. If you think you've "arrived" a certain point in your study, practice, career or field of research (all four combined for each requires the other), to the point where you think you have no more to learn, you've simply stopped growing.

There are people here who are giving you free education every single day. Youtube isn't a classroom.

[_ldsfaqs]

Actually what you've described perfectly describes you all....

After all, HE is the one who posted a personal attack, and keeps acting like a child repeating the same thing over and over again that has ZERO to do with this thread I've posted. More so, because I've backed up my statement many times on this forum over the years, and he knows it, he just doesn't care like you all don't care about the things I prove. You just keep believing your lies, and then try to claim I never provide any facts. Facts are all I post every day, yet every day all you people do is personally attack, almost NEVER engaging the subject matter.

Me not writing a thesis paper every time I say something, doesn't somehow equal "avoidance".
(Well, technically that's what I used to do when I just was hear about Mormonism and correcting the anti-Mormon claims. Now I'm doing something bigger, exposing the evils of our day, which almost entirely come from liberalism).

[_Gunnar]

Jersey Girl, the only thing you got wrong in your last post is referring to Lemmie as "him." Lemmie is a woman. Everything else you said about her is right on! I heartily share your admiration for her!

[_Lemmie]

Jersey Girl, the only thing you got wrong in your last post is referring to Lemmie as "him." Lemmie is a woman. Everything else you said about her is right on! I heartily share your admiration for her!

Thank you, Gunner, I appreciate your comment very much! Jersey Girl knows my gender, I'm assuming that something like 'darn that autocorrect' is the culprit if she used the incorrect pronoun.

[_canpakes]

After all, HE is the one who posted a personal attack, and keeps acting like a child repeating the same thing over and over again that has ZERO to do with this thread I've posted.

No personal attack was posted.

More so, because I've backed up my statement many times on this forum over the years, and he knows it, he just doesn't care like you all don't care about the things I prove.

No, you have not done this. You have never once posted an actual reference to any law or the text of the one that forced banks to give loans to poor people who would not otherwise qualify according to that bank's lending standards.

All that you've done is post references that make this claim. That's not good enough, nor or it truthful, and folks here can plainly see that you are not being truthful about this.

You just keep believing your lies, and then try to claim I never provide any facts. Facts are all I post every day, yet every day all you people do is personally attack, almost NEVER engaging the subject matter.

If you are so good at posting facts, then you'll have absolutely no problem pointing to any law or the text of the one that forced banks to give loans to poor people who would not otherwise qualify according to that bank's lending standards.

Hey, just reference back to one of your old posts, if you'd like - as long as it fulfills this request of pointing to any law or the text of the one that forced banks to give loans to poor people who would not otherwise qualify according to that bank's lending standards.

Have I been explicit enough with my incredibly simple request?

Me not writing a thesis paper every time I say something, doesn't somehow equal "avoidance".

No one asked you for a thesis. I only asked for you to point to any law or the text of the one that forced banks to give loans to poor people who would not otherwise qualify according to that bank's lending standards.

Can't do it? Then you're a liar, or a tool - or both. You decide.