Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
I mean, you can misconstrue an obvious rhetorical device if you like. I'm clearly talking about this:
https://www.google.com/search?q=san+fra ... eless+camp
And this:
https://venturebeat.com/2017/03/10/tech ... francisco/Zander Dejah, 25, pays $1,900 a month rent to live in a downtown San Francisco house with at least 40 other people, many of whom sleep in bunk beds.... [his real estate] company runs nine communal properties, three of which are in San Francisco. The others are in Austin, Texas, and Oakland, California.
- Doc
Yes. If someone chooses to live in a city with a massive housing shortage, then they will have to deal with sky-high prices and cramped living quarters. It's not rocket science.
They need to either reduce the number of people looking for housing, or increase the amount of available housing. It's a balanced equation with each side connected by "pricing."