Winning: Food Stamp program costs hit 7 year low

[Guest]

The amount of money the federal government spends on the food stamp program has hit a seven-year low, according to the latest U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) data outlining the cost of the food stamp program.

The U.S. government spent an estimated $68 billion on the food stamp program in fiscal year (FY) 2017, the lowest amount the government has spent on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—the program that administers food stamps—since the year 2010 when the government funneled $68.2 billion towards the program.

Government spending on the SNAP program peaked at an all-time high in 2013, when the federal government poured an estimated $79.8 billion into the program because the Obama administration allowed those with higher incomes to receive benefits.

Enrollment in the government program swelled to 47.6 million in 2013—its highest level since former President Lyndon Johnson began the food stamp program in 1964.

As more people enrolled in SNAP, the government spent more money on the program to keep up with the influx of people receiving benefits.
Although both spending and enrollment reached its peak in 2013, the massive increase in federal government spending on the program began in 2009—the first year of Barack Obama’s presidency, according to USDA data.
advertisement

In 2008, the last year of former President George W. Bush’s term, the federal government spent $37.6 billion on the food stamp program. A year later, after Obama’s first year in office, the government poured $53.6 billion into the program.

The estimated $16 billion spike in government spending on food stamps between 2008 and 2009 is the largest increase in the history of the food stamp program.

The second largest increase in government spending on food stamps took place the following year, when the U.S. government poured an additional $15 billion into the program.

While the amount of government money spent on SNAP has decreased, spending has not gone down to its pre-recession levels.

Government spending on SNAP only decreased by $2 billion over the past year from 2016 when the government spent $70 billion on the program.
advertisement

President Trump said he would make it a priority in his administration to get able-bodied adults back to work and off welfare at the federal level when he announced his 2018 budget, and his administration announced several new initiatives aimed at driving SNAP program costs down this month.

The USDA announced this month that they would give state agencies more control over administering SNAP and that they are testing a program in Arizona aimed at reducing instances of food stamp fraud.

“We want to make sure that people are getting the nutrition they need, but we also must maintain the integrity of the SNAP program for the benefit of recipients and for the protection of the taxpayers,” Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue said in a statement Friday.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -year-low/

[_EAllusion]

That's a consequence of the economic recovery that occurred during the Obama years Ajax. It's just fewer people qualifying for and needing SNAP benefits due to economic recovery from the recession at the end of the Bush presidency. Unemployment has plummeted since the peak effects of the recession. Are you saying the Obama years were "winning?" Or are you trying to falsely imply that the election Trump has successfully booted lazy negroes off the dole as would be your normal mode of thinking?

[_canpakes]

Yep, this has been in decline for a while now.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Judging by our obesity rates the food assistance program has been very successful. I propose if Trump is still going to build The Wall, he force those on food assistance to swing a hammer, mainly because they need the exercise. This, of course, includes the under exercised children, too.

- Doc

[_Dr. Shades]

Remember, Maxine, that it's necessary to post a link to your source when copying-and-pasting.

So, what's the source of your copy-and-paste?

[_subgenius]

Yep, this has been in decline for a while now.

Wiw, that's a pretty steep jump after 2008, what happened there?

[_Maxine Waters]

Remember, Maxine, that it's necessary to post a link to your source when copying-and-pasting.

So, what's the source of your copy-and-paste?

Done, sorry for the oversight.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -year-low/

[_Always Changing]

And, in the meantime, I participate as a client in a grocery delivery service, run by volunteers. They only deliver to the elderly, handicapped, or people without transportation. Someone complained that the receipt contained information about whether the individual was paying through foodstamps, and did not want the volunteers to know that. It was humiliating to them. This has changed, and the receipt looks like it was paid by credit card. I am happy with this, because my foodstamp account has a high balance, and I don't want them to steal government money.

The increased participation rate has a lot to do with the change from physical foodstamps to a transaction that resembles a credit-card transaction. People are often ashamed to admit to such desperation.

[_Kevin Graham]

Just goes to prove Trump has nothing to do with it. Costs dropped from $80 billion to 70 billion in just the previous three years. 2017 payouts were almost $3 billion less than 2016. Just a trend already started.

[_EAllusion]

Yep, this has been in decline for a while now.

Wiw, that's a pretty steep jump after 2008, what happened there?

The worst recession since the Great Depression. Small news story, so you may not have heard about it.