Page 1 of 1
Proposition 65 The Left's War on Science
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2018 3:30 am
by _DoubtingThomas
California judge said Starbucks coffee must have a cancer warning. As potholer54 says "unfortunately the law doesn't necessarily conform to scientific norms or common sense". In his new video potholer54 does a great job in debunking this ridiculous ruling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9CxN6wSLa0Proposition 65 is a bad law because it is a distraction from warning labels that actually matter.
Re: Proposition 65 The Left's War on Science
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:42 am
by _moksha
There is more acrylamide in the BYU date night favorite of a plate of cookies served with two glasses of wholesome milk.
Re: Proposition 65 The Left's War on Science
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:54 am
by _Some Schmo
DoubtingThomas wrote:California judge said Starbucks coffee must have a cancer warning. As potholer54 says "unfortunately the law doesn't necessarily conform to scientific norms or common sense". In his new video potholer54 does a great job in debunking this ridiculous ruling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9CxN6wSLa0Proposition 65 is a bad law because it is a detraction from warning labels that actually matter.
AC/DC learn a new chord!! Awesome.
But yeah, that sounds crazy. The label should just tell customers not to eat the cup.
Re: Proposition 65 The Left's War on Science
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:23 pm
by _cinepro
The problem with Prop 65 warnings (and other similar endeavors) is that once you have enough warning signs, they become meaningless. Those signs are absolutely everywhere.
Re: Proposition 65 The Left's War on Science
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 2:24 am
by _DoubtingThomas
cinepro wrote:The problem with Prop 65 warnings (and other similar endeavors) is that once you have enough warning signs, they become meaningless. Those signs are absolutely everywhere.
Exactly! Prop 65 is doing more harm than good.