All bets are...
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 2:15 pm
ON !?!
The NFL’s Colin Kaepernick problem? It’s over, at least in terms of the business of football.
Kaepernick, and player protests, remains a hot-button issue for the league to sort out. Whatever slump the NFL suffered from backlash over Kaepernick in 2016 sitting and then later taking a knee during the national anthem to protest inequality will likely be a blip compared to the coming wave of legalized sports wagering revenue and interest. And, really, when is the NFL ever about anything but revenue?
The gold rush is on for the NFL after Monday’s 6-3 ruling by the United States Supreme Court to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), which for 25 years has essentially limited sports betting to Nevada.
Industry experts are unanimous in their predictions. Higher revenue. Higher television ratings. Higher engagement with fans. Higher advertising and sponsorship deals.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/angst-coli ... 16911.html
The NFL will fight for a cut of all wagering done on its games. The NBA has already proposed a 1 percent share. That is to be negotiated but represents a potential tidal wave of money.
Is this a good thing for the obvious government revenue to be had?
(footnote: what else has Supreme Court and other courts been up to while the hair-fires ablaze over Cohen and ex-porn stars?)
The NFL’s Colin Kaepernick problem? It’s over, at least in terms of the business of football.
Kaepernick, and player protests, remains a hot-button issue for the league to sort out. Whatever slump the NFL suffered from backlash over Kaepernick in 2016 sitting and then later taking a knee during the national anthem to protest inequality will likely be a blip compared to the coming wave of legalized sports wagering revenue and interest. And, really, when is the NFL ever about anything but revenue?
The gold rush is on for the NFL after Monday’s 6-3 ruling by the United States Supreme Court to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), which for 25 years has essentially limited sports betting to Nevada.
Industry experts are unanimous in their predictions. Higher revenue. Higher television ratings. Higher engagement with fans. Higher advertising and sponsorship deals.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/angst-coli ... 16911.html
The NFL will fight for a cut of all wagering done on its games. The NBA has already proposed a 1 percent share. That is to be negotiated but represents a potential tidal wave of money.
Is this a good thing for the obvious government revenue to be had?
(footnote: what else has Supreme Court and other courts been up to while the hair-fires ablaze over Cohen and ex-porn stars?)