Let's be crazy and assume this isn't just another manufactured scandal created by FOX. There are only two possible outcomes.
1. They say Clinton did nothing criminal, in which case FOX will ignore the findings and press on with the conspiracy theorizing in more desperate attempts to take focus off of the fact that they gave us a President who is a mix between Bozo the Clown, Rumplestiltskin and Adolf Hitler.
2. Clinton engaged in a "pay for play" system exactly like FOX and their readers have been
alleging without evidence for years. In which case, they'll have to explain how this is a problem since they have since already shifted their ground on the swampiness and legality of this during the Trump era.
Frankly I'd prefer to see the second option be true just to see how they justify attacking a former politician who was never President for doing something they excuse the current President of doing on a daily basis.
Of course we all know that FOX refuted itself on the bogus Uranium One scandal they created, but that seems to be a huge part of the current hair-fire rationale behind calling her "crooked Hillary."
The difference between Hillary and Trump is that Trump is using his attorney to form shell corporations to launder his bribes and pay off his porn stars. But bach and FOX is cool with that because technically this is just normal in Washington.
Hillary's so called "bribes" are going to a Public Charity and the idiots on the Right think she pockets all the money because the charity is named after her. That's the whole basis for assuming she is being bribed but the fact is
she doesn't even take a salary. She's going to do political favors for Iran and Saudi Arabia because they"gave money to her"? No, because they donated money to a charity named after her family. If the money is going to charity, who gives a flying âFâ where it comes from?
Charity Watch president Daniel Borochoff said "The Clinton Foundation is an excellent charity. They are able to get 88 percent of their spending to bona fide program services and their fundraising efficiency is really low. It only costs them $2 to raise $100."
The American Institute of Philanthropy, a charity watchdog,
gives the Clinton Foundation an A rating and concluded that about 89 percent of its funding went to charity.