Anyone interpret Kavanough's Yearbook yet?

[_aussieguy55]

"have you boofed yet"?

https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalMemes ... fed_yet_4/

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

You don't really follow the threads, do you?

- Doc

[_Kevin Graham]

I searched google to find a single example of "Devil's Triangle" being mentioned on FOX News and all I got were references to the Bermuda Triangle.

The Right Wing propaganda machine is intentionally hopping over the biggest piece of evidence against Kavanaugh's claims. They have him on to throw him softball questions, and don't even bring this up?

[_subgenius]

1. Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month.

2. Ford told no one what happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother - a.k.a. -no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story.

3. Ford identifies 4 people she as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”

4. Ford's own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother, father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family.

5. Ford contends that notes her therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention Kavanaugh.

6. Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.

[_Kevin Graham]

1. Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month.

Which is expected to those who actually understand traumatic events and how they affect people.

2. Ford told no one what happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother - a.k.a. -no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story.

Again, this is expected of genuine victims of trauma 35 years later.

3. Ford identifies 4 people she as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”

Expected again, and Keyser said she didn't even know Kavanaugh back then. So why would she be expected to remember someone she doesn't know, at a party 35 years ago? She also said she believes Ford's allegations about Kavanaugh. Ooops? Forgot to mention that part huh.

4. Ford's own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother, father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family.

More despicable Republican smearing based on speculation and innuendo. Silence doesn't translate to disagreement. But you're wrong because Ford’s father, Ralph Blasey Jr., a Republican, offered a brief endorsement of his daughter. “I think all of the Blasey family would support her. I think her record stands for itself. Her schooling, her jobs and so on." But please keep repeating half-truths provided by your idiot talk radio shows.

5. Ford contends that notes her therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention Kavanaugh.

Of course not, they don't mention any names. Why would they? The therapist wasn't filling out a police report. God you're damned dumb.

6. Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.

No, this is what the Post reported:

"She contacted The Post through a tip line in early July (2018), when it had become clear that Kavanaugh was on the shortlist of possible nominees to replace retiring justice Anthony M. Kennedy but before Trump announced his name publicly."

Kavanaugh didn't appear on the initial list back in November 2016, but he was certainly talked about as a potential candidate in the media, including the NYT back in November 2016 and CNN just two months later. The same month Trump got elected the National Review did a piece arguing for Kavanaugh.

But yeah, tell me more.

You're a despicable piece of crap.

[_subgenius]

You're a despicable piece of crap.

And finally, the last resort of the defeated, thanks!