If someone is a wife-beating rapist, then they should not be elected to the US Senate, or to an equivalent position in any other country.
Just to get this clear, can you post links to the evidence that the person in question can plausibly be suspected of being:
(a) A perpetrator of domestic violence
(b) A rapist
I ask simply so that this thread can be self-contained. (And I am not, of course, asking for proof beyond a reasonable doubt.)
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
The current evidence is that his opponent in a Senate race says multiple women have anonymously reported to the Enquirer who then told him that Brown abused them and now a former attorney for his opponent says she represents a client anonymously making that accusation.
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
EAllusion wrote:The current evidence is that his opponent in a Senate race says multiple women have anonymously reported to him that Brown abused him and now a former attorney for his opponent says she represents a client anonymously making that accusation.
And the 'wife-beating'? That can hardly be an anonymous allegation, surely? Or has WD just put that in the mix for fun?
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
EAllusion wrote:The current evidence is that his opponent in a Senate race says multiple women have anonymously reported to him that Brown abused him and now a former attorney for his opponent says she represents a client anonymously making that accusation.
And the 'wife-beating'? That can hardly be an anonymous allegation, surely? Or has Water Dog just put that in the mix for fun?
Dog threw that in. The gist of it is that his election opponent is claiming he has secret evidence that Brown is a serial offender against women and a political ally has now just chimed in and added to that charge.
The link Water Dog offered goes straight to his campaign website.
Chap wrote:And the 'wife-beating'? That can hardly be an anonymous allegation, surely? Or has Water Dog just put that in the mix for fun?
Dog threw that in. The gist of it is that his election opponent is claiming he has secret evidence that Brown is a serial offender against women and a political ally has now just chimed in and added to that charge.
The link Water Dog offered goes straight to his campaign website.
Ah. I'd still like Dog to respond to my request, though ...
Chap wrote:Just to get this clear, can you post links to the evidence that the person in question can plausibly be suspected of being:
(a) A perpetrator of domestic violence
(b) A rapist
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Chap wrote:Just to get this clear, can you post links to the evidence that the person in question can plausibly be suspected of being:
wow, a big departure from your previous critical mass for credibility vis-a-vis the Dr. Ford allegation, where the allegation was proof enough for you....and party affiliation of course.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent