Ten questions for WaterDog

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

Water Dog wrote: I really want to know if drool is constantly flowing from various orifices in your body. Perhaps a patch of missing hair and a big scar, a lasting reminder of some incident that resulted in irreparable brain damage. You are a hoot, man.


How is aerosol pollution affecting Earth's atmosphere?
How does the carbon cycle work?
How is the additional CO2 affecting the carbon cycle?
How do you explain the Faint young Sun paradox?
How did the Earth escape from its ice-bound conditions during the pre-Cambrian (4,600 million years ago - 541 (+/- 1) million years ago)?
What caused past temperature swings lasting millions of years?
Why does carbon dioxide correlate so well with these temperature swings over the last 500 million years?
What caused the ice sheets to melt during the most recent deglaciation?
What has caused temperatures to rise so steeply in the last 40 years?
Why have global temperatures been hitting record highs over the last 20 years?
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

I love that DT posts a bunch of questions he doesn't have the first damned clue about, or how to explain, yet he expects WD to waste his time doing so.

:rolleyes:

- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:I love that DT posts a bunch of questions he doesn't have the first ____ clue about, or how to explain, yet he expects Water Dog to waste his time doing so.

:rolleyes:

- Doc


Of course I understand all of my questions! It is no rocket science dog, you don't need a background in science to answer them.

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
_DoubtingThomas
_Emeritus
Posts: 4551
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:04 am

Re: Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _DoubtingThomas »

Doc thinks the questions are hard LOL
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _DarkHelmet »

DoubtingThomas wrote:Of course I understand all of my questions! It is no rocket science dog, you don't need a background in science to answer them.

I love how these questions are so mysterious to some people. This stuff is well understood. Dog and Doc might not know the answers off the top of their heads, but they're easy to find. Most of these questions are explained in a high school geography textbook and can be googled.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:I love that DT posts a bunch of questions he doesn't have the first ____ clue about, or how to explain, yet he expects Water Dog to waste his time doing so.

:rolleyes:

- Doc


You mean like how the Dog cuts and pastes graphs that he doesn’t understand and expects others to waste their time explaining them? :lol:
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _moksha »

How did the Earth escape from its ice-bound conditions during the pre-Cambrian (4,600 million years ago - 541 (+/- 1) million years ago)?

So what is the answer to this question?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _subgenius »

DoubtingThomas wrote:
Water Dog wrote: I really want to know if drool is constantly flowing from various orifices in your body. Perhaps a patch of missing hair and a big scar, a lasting reminder of some incident that resulted in irreparable brain damage. You are a hoot, man.


How is aerosol pollution affecting Earth's atmosphere?

...

Most of your questions are absurd and superficial. Like this "aerosol" question...anthro aerosol like smoke or haze? or natural aerosol like dust, pollen, volcanic eruptions?

You don't really have a "gotcha" in that tool belt of alleged questions, just a whole bunch of arbitrary and unsettled scientific theories.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _Chap »

subgenius wrote:
DoubtingThomas wrote:How is aerosol pollution affecting Earth's atmosphere?
...


Most of your questions are absurd and superficial. Like this "aerosol" question...anthro aerosol like smoke or haze? or natural aerosol like dust, pollen, volcanic eruptions?


Oh, you're not familiar with that concept? Help is at hand:

Does air pollution—specifically tiny atmospheric particles (aerosols)—affect global warming?


Air pollution occurs when the air contains gases, dust, smoke from fires, or fumes in harmful amounts. Tiny atmospheric particles - aerosols - are a subset of air pollution that are suspended in our atmosphere.

Aerosol can be both solid and liquid. Most are produced by natural processes such as erupting volcanoes, and some are from human industrial and agricultural activities.

Aerosols have a measurable effect on climate change. Light-colored aerosol particles can reflect incoming energy from the sun in cloud-free air and dark particles can absorb it. Over the historic period, the net effect globally was for aerosols to partially offset the rise in global mean surface temperature. Aerosols can modify how much energy clouds reflect and they can change atmospheric circulation patterns.

Image

Black carbon aerosols, similar to the soot in a chimney, absorb sunlight rather than reflecting it. This warms the layer of the atmosphere carrying the black carbon, but also shades and cools the surface below.

This portrait of global aerosols was produced by a GEOS-5 simulation at a 10-kilometer resolution. Dust (red) is lifted from the surface, sea salt (blue) swirls inside cyclones, smoke (green) rises from fires, and sulfate particles (white) stream from volcanoes and fossil fuel emissions

Aerosol sources, composition, and removal processes

Worldwide, most atmospheric aerosol particles are produced by natural processes such as grinding and erosion of land surfaces resulting in dust, salt-spray formation in oceanic breaking waves, biological decay, forest fires, chemical reactions of atmospheric gases, and volcanic injection.

Some particles, on the other hand, have human origins—industry, agriculture, transport (including aviation), and construction. The composition of atmospheric aerosol particles varies widely depending on their source—they may contain salts (predominantly sulfates), minerals (such as silicon), organic materials, and, in most cases, water.

The particles grow by absorbing water vapor and other gases. In moist air, clouds form when water vapor condenses onto these ‘cloud condensation nuclei’. These then grow into cloud drops, which eventually fall to the surface as rain or snow, depositing the particles on land or in the ocean.



A number of atmospheric probes are installed along the fuselage of NASA's DC-8 in preparation for the SEAC4RS study to learn more about how air pollution and natural emissions affect climate change.
Although dust plumes from the Sahara and Gobi deserts can be seen circling most of the globe in satellite pictures, aerosol particles in the lower troposphere (the lowest layer of the atmosphere, where weather occurs) are usually removed from the atmosphere by settling and precipitation within several days to weeks after they were produced. In the stratosphere (the atmosphere layer above the troposphere), chemical reactions of gases from volcanoes produce sulfate particles that can remain for one or more years, spreading over much of the globe.

Aerosol particles and climate

Although we are familiar with local particulate ‘air pollution’ due to human activities, the fact that atmospheric particles of both natural and human origin have substantial influence on our climate is less widely understood. The particles can play important climatic roles both outside and inside clouds.

In clear air, tiny aerosol particles interact with the solar beam. Particles containing little or no carbon are effectively ‘white.’ They reflect solar radiation, making the air and Earth surface below them a bit cooler than they would otherwise be. Sulfate particles in the stratosphere from the Pinatubo volcanic eruption in 1991, for example, produced measurable cooling for two years over much of the globe. In contrast, particles containing substantial amounts of black carbon (e. g., soot, which is typically produced from combustion of fossil fuels, biofuels, and biomass burning) warm their surroundings by absorbing solar radiation before it reaches the ground. Since black carbon reflects the incoming sunlight, it also acts a shade and the ground surface below becomes cooler.


Black carbon aerosols, similar to the soot in a chimney, absorb sunlight rather than reflecting it. This warms the layer of the atmosphere carrying the black carbon, but also shades and cools the surface below.
These tiny particles also create cloud droplets in the lower troposphere. Water droplets and ice particles are basically white, so they reflect solar radiation; on the other hand, the condensed water also traps and emits long wave radiation, producing heat. Thus clouds can have either cooling or warming effects on a local area, depending on the altitude of the cloud and whether the reflecting or trapping effect is strongest.

Because of many unknowns relating to aerosol particles, the magnitude of aerosol impacts is one of the major advancements in understanding that occurred between the fourth and fifth IPCC climate assessments. Particularly noteworthy is the higher confidence regarding aerosol radiation interactions and volcanic aerosols. NASA currently has several aerosol monitoring sites across the world, whose data are used for better understanding of climate and air quality, and for better pollution management.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Oct 25, 2018 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Ten questions for WaterDog

Post by _Res Ipsa »

subgenius wrote:
Most of your questions are absurd and superficial. Like this "aerosol" question...anthro aerosol like smoke or haze? or natural aerosol like dust, pollen, volcanic eruptions?

You don't really have a "gotcha" in that tool belt of alleged questions, just a whole bunch of arbitrary and unsettled scientific theories.


That's because science isn't about "gotcha" questions. That's what denialism is about.
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
Post Reply