COVID Deaths are an Undercount

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_Icarus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1541
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:01 pm

COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _Icarus »

The more we learn the more it seems to be the case that far more people were infected far earlier.

The implications for this? The death toll is very likely under reported. Deaths in early February being described as the "tip of an iceberg" coupled with an early surge in what we thought was a influenza spike, could mean we're off on the numbers by thousands.''

California Finds New Coronavirus Deaths Weeks Earlier Than First Reported In U.S.
A county in California said Tuesday it had identified two people who died from COVID-19 in early- and mid-February, weeks before what was initially reported as the nation’s first coronavirus was found in Washington State. The news may shift the timeline for the virus’ spread in the country earlier that initially believed.

Santa Clara County said Tuesday a medical examiner had performed autopsies on two people who died on Feb. 6 and Feb. 17, both of whom tested positive for the coronavirus.

“These . . . individuals died at home during a time when very limited testing was available only through the CDC,” the county said in a statement.
“Testing criteria set by the CDC at the time restricted testing to only individuals with a known travel history and who sought medical care for specific symptoms.“

It noted that: “As the Medical Examiner-Coroner continues to carefully investigate deaths throughout the county, we anticipate additional deaths from COVID-19 will be identified.”

Up until now, the first deaths in the United States linked to the coronavirus had been on Feb. 26 in the Seattle area. Washington quickly became a hot spot for cases of COVID-19, tearing through nursing homes and prompting the governor to declare a state of emergency on Feb. 29. More than 12,300 people have since been infected with the virus in Washington and 683 have died.

The new fatalities are significant in that they could dramatically extend the amount of time cases of the coronavirus were spreading undetected in parts of the country before social distancing measures and stay-at-home orders were put in place. Cases grew exponentially in the early weeks of the pandemic and more than 825,000 people in the U.S. have now been infected.

Dr. Jeff Smith, a physician and the Santa Clara County Executive, told The Mercury News the results, which were delivered to officials Tuesday, “means the virus has been around for a while.” He told the outlet he believed the cases originated somewhere within the community, building on his comments earlier this month that the virus had most likely been around in the area “a lot longer than we first believed.”

“This wasn’t recognized because we were having a severe flu season,” he told The Los Angeles Times on April 11.

Smith said at the time he thought the virus may have been spreading in the Santa Clara region since December of last year.

The county was one of the first in the nation to announce stay-at-home orders in mid-March, and California has instituted dramatic efforts to stop the spread of the virus statewide. But Dr. Sara Cody, Santa Clara County’s chief medical officer, told The New York Times the two reported deaths were “probably the tip of an iceberg of unknown size.”

“We had so few pixels you could hardly pick out the image,” she told the outlet on Tuesday. “Suddenly we have many pixels that all of sudden that we didn’t even realize that we were looking for.”
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _EAllusion »

Oh, the official numbers are almost certainly highly conservative if only because we are only counting confirmed tested deaths for the most part as probable cause comes online, we know people are dying before they get a test, and there's a huge spike in all-cause mortality beyond official COVID deaths. Researchers will eventually catch up to this, but the national discourse unfortunately has become hyper-focused on that official number because it is so daunting by itself. People are citing that number all the time as *the* number. I'm not sure what's going to happen when people are told that the real number is 70% higher (or whatever) than what they've been used to. If we really were closing in on 80k deaths right now, that wouldn't be a surprising finding, but I do think the public would be blown away by that and it likely would produce ridiculous anti-science commentary.

The "it's just the flu, bro" crowd loves to point out thousands of people die from flu every year, so one way of trying to explain it to them is that people who die having tested positive for influenza is only a fraction of that estimated death toll.
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _I have a question »

The death toll is definitely an undercount. The deaths reported from Covid-19 are only those that occur in a setting where the victim has been tested and found positive for Covid-19. Those people with symptoms who stay at home without being tested, those people who die at home or in care homes without being tested, are not included in the figures.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Here in the Heart of the Heart of Zion when a nursing home resident dies they aren’t automatically tested for the virus. It has to be requested by the facility, family, or health department. I wonder when 2020 wraps up how we’ll make a rough estimate of COVID-19 shark bite deaths? Does one just cap out swimming pool drownings at 50,000 and put the rest into shark bite deaths?

- Doc
_Icarus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1541
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:01 pm

Re: COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _Icarus »

I think it becomes significant politically given we're in an election year and Trump has already used anything under 100,000 deaths as a victory for himself. If we're just now peaking then the down-slope will see another 45,000 deaths over the next month and we'll likely be well over 100,000 deaths by the time November comes around, especially if Dr. Fauci's prediction about a second wave spike in the Fall comes true.

My experience on social media has been arguing with Trump supporters who firmly believe the numbers are an exaggeration and they're making dumb claims similar to the one subgenius made about deaths counting towards COVID when they were completely unrelated deaths. It seems that the more we learn, the exact opposite is true. Two weeks ago I heard about the story of a woman having her son's body autopsied and they determined it was COVID that killed him. At that point I had no idea people were actually dying from these symptoms and weren't getting tested.

Now I understand why Trump has been so adamant against testing. He cut funding two weeks ago, and it is likely because he understands that more tests = more case counts = more deaths. I'm beginning to think the low deaths/case counts in states like Texas is due to lack of testing.
_Icarus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1541
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:01 pm

Re: COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _Icarus »

I have a question wrote:
Wed Apr 22, 2020 1:53 pm
The death toll is definitely an undercount. The deaths reported from Covid-19 are only those that occur in a setting where the victim has been tested and found positive for Covid-19. Those people with symptoms who stay at home without being tested, those people who die at home or in care homes without being tested, are not included in the figures.
Actually the CDC sent out guidelines in the first week of April to instruct doctors to include deaths that were "highly likely" to be due to COVID. This is why we saw a 4000 day spike in the death count a couple weeks back, after New York added all the deaths that they believed were COVID. This mandate led to the Right Wing media spreading stupid conspiracy theories that the media is intentionally inflating numbers by including people who died "with" COVID instead of "from" COVID. Hence, subgenius's baseless claim which he borrowed from Laura Ingraham.
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _subgenius »

Apart from the tragic absurdity of you guys hoping for a higher death count, it must be noted that whomever you are sourcing your total from there is more probability that your are wrong. Yes, it could be more and yes, it could be less. But the hyperbole stemming from your hysteria is becoming more laughable and is perhaps the most damaging consequence of this whole hysteria. Like how many of you were blatantly wrong about the 30 day death rate claim on another thread.

When you review CDC reports (based on death certificate reporting) you can see the following clarifications:
1Deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19, coded to ICD–10 code U07.1.
2Pneumonia death counts exclude pneumonia deaths involving influenza.
3Influenza death counts include deaths with pneumonia or COVID-19 also listed as a cause of death.

The report stands that from Feb 01 to April 18 we have 21,050 deaths [b}confirmed AND presumed from COVID19[/b].
To speculate and then demand that this number is 500 or 50,000 more or less is speculation that only serves as masturbation for hysteria.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/COVID19/
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _EAllusion »

"Only 90k people died because I artificially set the bar at 100k, so when you think about it, I did great. Just shut up about preventable deaths," is just insane, but I can see cable news pundits going along with it and therefore a sizeable chunk of the public going along with it, because our country has gone insane.

This has been brewing for longer than the moment, but America is so very, very broken. The pandemic just makes certain things really clear.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _EAllusion »

The report you are citing subs specifically says in the data table:

[quote]NOTE: Number of deaths reported in this table are the total number of deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and do not represent all deaths that occurred in that period.
*Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction, age, and cause of death.[/quote]

Which might help explain why this number is fewer than half the tally reported by *checks notes* the CDC:

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... in-us.html
_Icarus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1541
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:01 pm

Re: COVID Deaths are an Undercount

Post by _Icarus »

It is almost as if subgenius is trying to hoodwink us. But he'd never do that, right?

From the article he cited:

"Note: Provisional death counts are based on death certificate data received and coded by the National Center for Health Statistics as of April 22, 2020. Death counts are delayed and may differ from other published sources (see Technical Notes). Counts will be updated periodically. Additional information will be added to this site as available."

And again:

"NOTE: Number of deaths reported in this table are the total number of deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and do not represent all deaths that occurred in that period."

And we're still waiting for subgenius to support his previous claim that people who died from completely unrelated causes are counted towards COVID.
Post Reply