The income gap between the ears
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:31 pm
In 1820, 94% of the world’s population was living in extreme poverty.
By 1910, this figure had fallen to 82%
By 1950 the rate had dropped yet further, to 72%.
However, the largest and fastest decline occurred between 1981 (44.3%) and 2015 (9.6%).
The weekly hours worked by the average American are now 25 hours less than they were in 1860. At the same time, people enter the world of work later in life, retire earlier and live longer after retirement.
A study of 180 countries over four decades shows that the increase in income for the poorest in a society is primarily due to growth rather than redistribution: 77% of income growth for the poorest 40% of a population are directly linked to the average growth of a country.
So yes, the "wealthy" have gotten wealthier, and often it has been at a greater pace than the millions of people who are not "at the top".
But not starving and not being unemployed is a significant accomplishment for capitalism over the almost 200 years.
So, why is income so easily politicized among people who proclaim themselves as being led by facts and science?
By 1910, this figure had fallen to 82%
By 1950 the rate had dropped yet further, to 72%.
However, the largest and fastest decline occurred between 1981 (44.3%) and 2015 (9.6%).
The weekly hours worked by the average American are now 25 hours less than they were in 1860. At the same time, people enter the world of work later in life, retire earlier and live longer after retirement.
A study of 180 countries over four decades shows that the increase in income for the poorest in a society is primarily due to growth rather than redistribution: 77% of income growth for the poorest 40% of a population are directly linked to the average growth of a country.
So yes, the "wealthy" have gotten wealthier, and often it has been at a greater pace than the millions of people who are not "at the top".
But not starving and not being unemployed is a significant accomplishment for capitalism over the almost 200 years.
So, why is income so easily politicized among people who proclaim themselves as being led by facts and science?