Page 1 of 5
Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:35 pm
by _Icarus
Let’s be clear, the Republican lead Senate Intel Committe report released yesterday PROVES the Trump campaign coordinated, colluded & yes, conspired with Russia to steal the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton. Now more than ever . . .
Trump Family Members May Have Lied During Russia Testimony, Bipartisan Senate Leaders Say
In a bipartisan letter to the Justice Department, the Senate Intelligence Committee raised worries concerning statement provided by some of Donald Trump's family members throughout the Russia investigation. According to the Los Angeles Times," [The letter] raised concerns about statements given by relatives and also confidants of President Trump that appeared to contradict information supplied by a former deputy campaign chairman to Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III."
Re: Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 10:02 pm
by _Some Schmo
Icarus wrote: ↑Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:35 pm
Let’s be clear, the Republican lead Senate Intel Committe report released yesterday PROVES the Trump campaign coordinated, colluded & yes, conspired with Russia to steal the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton.
They must be RINOs.
Re: Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 11:37 pm
by _moksha
Since the Russians have free reign with divisive misinformation in the 2020 campaign, I am wondering if anyone has noticed an uptick in such divisive misinformation by operatives on this forum?
Re: Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 12:10 am
by _subgenius
Cool story how this report echoes the Mueller report and yet (a.k.a. in reality) PROVES nothing except:
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election.
But keep your faith based drivel moving forward. Your reliance on the cited language of "suggested..may have been" is PROOF of how weak minded your post is.
Re: Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 8:28 pm
by _Doctor CamNC4Me
So, I’ve been reading through the first four volumes of the report. I haven’t touched the fifth volume, yet. It’s about a thousand pages.
Bottom line: The report describes hundreds of actions by Trump, his campaign, and his associates in the run-up to the 2016 election that involve various degrees of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity that did, in fact, meddle in the election and ultimately influence.
I don’t know what else to say on the matter except the report is ‘right there’ and easily accessible. When McConnell says the report exonerates Trump and team he’s either totally ignorant of what’s contained in the report or he’s banking on the fact Trumpers won’t read it, don’t care to know the truth contained in it, and just need to be told a lie so they can repeat it.
What’s sad is this information was widely available to the Senate during Trump’s trial and they basically failed in their duty to safeguard the Republic. That’s treason.
- Doc
Re: Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 10:37 pm
by _Elphaba
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 8:28 pm
What’s sad is this information was widely available to the Senate during Trump’s trial and they basically failed in their duty to safeguard the Republic. That’s treason.
I don't know whom I despise more: Trump or the obscenely treasonous Senate Republicans.
Honestly, at this point I would rather have the Republicans lose its grip on the Senate than Trump lose the presidency. He's crazy crazy, but they're not. They're just despicable human beings. The Democrats would take over the Senate, and thus, take away Trump's main weapon. He'd then become convictable, somewhat controllable, and best of all, mostly ignorable, all of which would make his head explode. Maybe then I'd be able to breathe, and perhaps even laugh, again.
Elphaba
Re: Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 11:57 pm
by _subgenius
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 8:28 pm
...various degrees of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity that did, in fact, meddle in the election and ultimately influence.
..
Can you offer up at least of the most severe examples here? Particular to Trump "meddling" if possible.
Re: Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 12:22 am
by _Doctor CamNC4Me
For sure. Understanding your attention span as I do what would be an effective way to communicate with you? In other words, what’s the best way to convey a lot of information as condensed as possible that’ll meet the bar you just set as “severe?”
For example, should I just type “Manafort?” I’m afraid once I get too wordy, like, maybe more than a sentence, you’ll be distracted by a squirrel, or a grindr notice will pop up on your phone and it’s off to the races.
Anyway. I’ve already lost you. If I haven’t, let me know how many sentences you can handle per ‘severe’ example.
As for others I’ll post this reminder:
“I don’t know what else to say on the matter except the report is ‘right there’ and easily accessible. When McConnell says the report exonerates Trump and team he’s either totally ignorant of what’s contained in the report or he’s banking on the fact Trumpers won’t read it, don’t care to know the truth contained in it, and just need to be told a lie so they can repeat it.”
- Doc
Re: Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 12:50 am
by _subgenius
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 12:22 am
For sure. Understanding your attention span as I do what would be an effective way to communicate with you? In other words, what’s the best way to convey a lot of information as condensed as possible that’ll meet the bar you just set as “severe?”
For example, should I just type “Manafort?” I’m afraid once I get too wordy, like, maybe more than a sentence, you’ll be distracted by a squirrel, or a grindr notice will pop up on your phone and it’s off to the races.
Anyway. I’ve already lost you. If I haven’t, let me know how many sentences you can handle per ‘severe’ example.
As for others I’ll post this reminder:
“I don’t know what else to say on the matter except the report is ‘right there’ and easily accessible. When McConnell says the report exonerates Trump and team he’s either totally ignorant of what’s contained in the report or he’s banking on the fact Trumpers won’t read it, don’t care to know the truth contained in it, and just need to be told a lie so they can repeat it.”
- Doc
Manafort? you are just now learning about him? Interesting. But I must apologize for assuming that you could easily provide an "example" from what you have described as being "hundreds" of examples.
Especially since the overwhelming take away from the newly released report has been:
"The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found no evidence .."
But apparently you have found "hundreds" of evidence...but you are just unable to provide any of it here, because of my attention span...oh, ok.
Re: Russian Collusion After All
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 2:16 am
by _MeDotOrg
In the 1950's, baseball's Cincinnati Reds changed their name to the Redlegs. The word RED had such negative connotation at the time that the franchise couldn't chance the association made with a name they had for 60 years.
Such was the power of the Red Menace in the 1950s, fueled by 'Tail-Gunner' Joe McCarthy. (McCarthy's lawyer, Roy Cohn, is the link to Donald Trump). I must admit, I don't anyone thought to monetize the Red Menace quite the way Steve Bannon monetized the Border Wall, but those were simpler times.
The GOP has come full circle with their own
Tinkers to Evers to Chance: McCarthy to Cohn to Trump. From the Red Menace to the Russian hoax.