"Greatest Presidential Felony" in History

[_subgenius]

This methodology being clearly different than the method used to determine how many died at war.

No it isn't.

So, you're saying that war dead were calcated via calculating the surplus for the number who would've died during peace? ergo, the cause id death is "occurred during wartime"....not by actually counting dog tags...mk.

Ok. CFR, bruh.
Ok. CFR.

[_Gunnar]

Another story from the Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/18/us/p ... f943162115

HHS spokesman and a new science advisor attempted to intimidate and silence CDC scientists.

Thus potentially destroying at one stroke the credibility and respect of the most highly respected and effective communicable disease control organization on the entire planet, that was rightfully acquired and earned by many decades of excellent service by some of the best qualified and most highly respected medical professionals on earth. Yet another reason why Trump is the most highly deranged and dangerous leader this country has ever produced!

[_Morley]

No it isn't.

So, you're saying that war dead were calcated via calculating the surplus for the number who would've died during peace? ergo, the cause id death is "occurred during wartime"....not by actually counting dog tags...mk.

Ok. CFR, bruh.
Ok. CFR.

I've no idea what "ergo, the cause id death is "occurred during wartime"....not by actually counting dog tags...mk" means.

However, knowing you'd need it, I had already added a link to provide for your predicted CFR.

Go back and read the article. Bruh yourself.

[_Gunnar]

No it isn't.

So, you're saying that war dead were calcated via calculating the surplus for the number who would've died during peace? ergo, the cause id death is "occurred during wartime"....not by actually counting dog tags...mk.

Ok. CFR, bruh.
Ok. CFR.

It still looks like you're desperately grasping at straws to me.

[_subgenius]

Please elaborate.

Looks to me like yet another feeble attempt by subby to grasp at or fish for straws.

And it is still both ignorant and dishonest of him to cavalierly dismiss the undisputed fact that the the U.S., with only 4.5% of the world's population has 1/4 of all the covid-19 cases and deaths.

ignorant is asserting that 4.5% and 1/4 is a meaningful correlation in this context and globally.

[_subgenius]

So, you're saying that war dead were calcated via calculating the surplus for the number who would've died during peace? ergo, the cause id death is "occurred during wartime"....not by actually counting dog tags...mk.

Ok. CFR, bruh.
Ok. CFR.

It still looks like you're desperately grasping at straws to me.

Im sure it does look that way to you, especially considering that you really really want death rate and population in america to be (1) significant when compared singularly to the world and (2) I don't have to grasp at anything, you guys are desperate.
http://mormondiscussions.com/viewtopic. ... 3#p1238543

[_subgenius]

Another story from the Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/18/us/p ... f943162115

HHS spokesman and a new science advisor attempted to intimidate and silence CDC scientists.

But crickets on the whole Nashville Mayor suppression of numbers...mk.

[_MissTish]

Do you mean the very misleading story from a Sinclair station website alleging a coronavirus coverup that served as the basis for several Fox News segments.

The story that ended up being retracted?

https://t.co/Yxf2gPryvr?amp=1

[_subgenius]

Do you mean the very misleading story from a Sinclair station website alleging a coronavirus coverup that served as the basis for several Fox News segments.

The story that ended up being retracted?

https://t.co/Yxf2gPryvr?amp=1

Indeed that is the one, thank you for the follow up.

[_subgenius]

I've no idea what "ergo, the cause id death is "occurred during wartime"....not by actually counting dog tags...mk" means.

However, knowing you'd need it, I had already added a link to provide for your predicted CFR.

Go back and read the article. Bruh yourself.

my bad, id=of (typo) - should read "ergo, the cause OF death is "occurred during wartime"....not by actually counting dog tags...mk

And I did not realize you were seriously providing a wikipedia link as an actual reference.
But, the 70+ million deaths kinda makes Met's graph even more absurd and poorly argued, so thanks for that (since that was the topic at hand).