Res Ipsa's exchange with [personal attack deleted — RI] is one of the reasons I reject your claim that he's just trying to be funny or whatever. If you want me to "admit" you're right then you need to produce a valid example of some "leftist rhetoric" arguing along such lines. I believe he is genuinely stupid and by giving him props for a job well done you're only enabling him to continue with littering this forum and turning it into a cesspool of trolls. Maybe you should consider the possibility that it is simply despicable in my mind that anyone would be using an accident and a tragedy to push a political narrative. Trolling or not, it needs to be called out for what it is.Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Sat Oct 23, 2021 7:39 pmDo you ever feel the need not to win some small point? The fact that you can’t admit that the qultist is using Leftist rhetoric and then you further deflect by shifting attention to Res Ipsa is classic you. Not every post has to be won - you’re not the anti-mopologist who, like them, needs to die on every ant hill. Different side, same coin.
Anyway. He’s been using this parody angle since he showed up. I pointed it out months ago, so I’m left to surmise people like Res Ipsa, who does in fact have a developed sense of humor, is just using him as a foil.
eta: canpakes is definitely using the cultist as a set-up man.
- Doc
The majority of his posts and threads I don't even respond to, but keep pretending I have to respond to everything and win.