Can't We Do Something about All the Idiotic Sock Puppets?

[doubtingthomas]

Wrong. But your response is hysterical. Really really funny. Test that thought out here.

Tell me. Are you happy and healthy?

[Tinfoilhat]

Wrong. But your response is hysterical. Really really funny. Test that thought out here.

Tell me. Are you happy and healthy?

Sorry, but when you asked this question I thought of this video
https://youtu.be/gNi_6U5Pm_o

[Chap]

If Atlanticmike returned to Md&D, he could bring an entire squad with him.

Good idea! What screen name should I pick?

Try 'Legion'.

[Binger]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

No. Only trolls define themselves that way.

Wrong. But your response is hysterical. Really really funny. Test that thought out here.

You’re better when you engage in the topic. This thread was actually pretty excellent as you made your case. You're a compelling poster if you want to be. I hope you do more of that instead of trolling. I actually got a lot out of this thread thanks to your on-topic posting. Hell, you got shades to come out of his Japanophilia for a moment and participate, which was no small feat.

- Doc

[doubtingthomas]

Sorry, but when you asked this question I thought of this video
https://youtu.be/gNi_6U5Pm_o

You like her?

[Marcus]

You’re better when you engage in the topic. This thread was actually pretty excellent as you made your case. You're a compelling poster if you want to be. I hope you do more of that instead of trolling. I actually got a lot out of this thread thanks to your on-topic posting. Hell, you got shades to come out of his Japanophilia for a moment and participate, which was no small feat.

- Doc

You make a good point. I had bing in my list of mike socks, but you're right, his on topic posts were far more intelligent than anything the mike has posted. Mike is a special sort of non-intelligent poster.

[canpakes]

Wrong. But your response is hysterical. Really really funny. Test that thought out here.

You’re better when you engage in the topic. This thread was actually pretty excellent as you made your case. You're a compelling poster if you want to be. I hope you do more of that instead of trolling. I actually got a lot out of this thread thanks to your on-topic posting. Hell, you got shades to come out of his Japanophilia for a moment and participate, which was no small feat.

- Doc

Spot on.

[Some Schmo]

And thus, not even the slightest hint for or interest in change. It is in that sense the rules are sancrosant. It doesn't matter what makes the board better or who complains. Shades isnt interested in anything that would increase quality if it means reducing quantity of clicks. Which is why it is outlawed to disinvite someone directly or even indirectly.

It would be weird if he cared about clicks since there's no advertising done here.

I do wonder if he intends to weigh in on this topic, though.

[Some Schmo]

You’re better when you engage in the topic.

He's done that? Ever?

I'm guessing that "better" in this case is akin to saying "dried crap is better than wet crap since there's less potential for a mess."