No, no deep investigation has been done of Joes participation, if any. The media has not yet, for lack of a better term, gone after him like they did the folks you mentioned. And I believe Trump was investigated exhaustively by th e media and half of congress and Senate. And if you think he needs to be investigated more, start a thread and I’ll listen.canpakes wrote: ↑Sat Mar 26, 2022 3:56 pm
Markk, it might appear instead to be that there’s a certain ‘tribe’ of folks who, as you say. “can’t really deal with, accept, absorb, or what ever word one chooses to use” the idea that merely waving accusations around in the air about Person B or C doesn’t really demonstrate any claims of behavior or alleged corruption for Person A.
If it did, you’d have to advocate for the entire previous First Family to be investigated and charged with ‘something’, because they knew of and worked with unsavory individuals, like Derkach, or Manafort, or Deripaska, or the Bayrock Group, or Timur Kulibayev, or Simon Kukes, or the Anbang Group.
Has anyone even decided just what Joe supposedly did, and for what reward?
The lap top this opened up a chapter in his mess, by and because of the media (NY TImes)…and if others jump on, and really want to find out things like who the ”big guy”is…this will get interesting. Is there a chance in your mind that there is a possibility that JB is that big guy?
What I am doing, by direction Kevins request, is showing patterns. There is a reason that Heinz did not want Hunter Biden and Archer to become associated with Burisma…it stinks, and if one sleeps in a pig pen one will get dirty.