The Offensive Attack Package adds a bit to the bottom line.
Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables
Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables
You're making this up. I don't believe you.(which he was going to equip with a mounted machine gun to kill liberals with).
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables
Says the guy who just lied about gun legality in NY.
"I am not an American ... In my view premarital sex should be illegal" - Ajax18
Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables
How would you practice proper socialist distancing guidelines if you were reliant on public transportation and had no automobile?My next replacement will be an electric, as the increases in range combined with the build out of charging stations makes an electric vehicle work. (Not to mention the extension of light rail service).
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables
Since when do you not believe something just because someone made it up? Isn't that why there's not going to be debates anymore, because then your guys can't lie through their teeth as easily?You're making this up. I don't believe you.
His narrative was defending the constitution and he wasn't totally clear about the scene, but since liberals are weak and anti-gun in his world, how could they possibly be a threat? Well, I'm not sure he'd really thought it through. But somehow the situation was there where he imagined himself racing across an apocalyptic landscape killing liberals in his truck, in service of president Trump. He said he would take a bullet right then and there for Trump. He said he would kill his best friend who is a liberal and who blocked him on Facebook. Wait, he wasn't saying this stuff, he was screaming it. I tried to bait him into saying he'd kill me also, but it didn't work. Well, at a certain point, he must of realized what he was sounding like given he'd provided so little context to all of this, and so near the end of the conversation, if you want to call it that, he explained in regards to his friend he didn't mean he was going to go out and hunt down and kill his friend, but because of the coming war they would find themselves on opposite sides of the battle and in that scenario he would not hesitate to kill his friend out of duty. (not because his feelings were hurt over Facebook or something)
So, I imagine that he had some context of the coming battle for Trump's presidency in mind, but I'm being generous here because the way the conversation started was with his truck, which led directly to the gun in the back killing the enemy, with the enemy being liberals, and at that point there was none of this context.