Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 7079
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables

Post by canpakes »

Gadianton wrote:
Sat Apr 16, 2022 4:21 pm
But in that same conversation, he was the one talking up how he was paining over the decision to buy a 75,000$ truck (which he was going to equip with a mounted machine gun to kill liberals with).

The Offensive Attack Package adds a bit to the bottom line.

Image
User avatar
ajax18
God
Posts: 2726
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:12 pm

Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables

Post by ajax18 »

(which he was going to equip with a mounted machine gun to kill liberals with).
You're making this up. I don't believe you.
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
K Graham
God
Posts: 1676
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2021 6:25 am

Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables

Post by K Graham »

ajax18 wrote:
Sat Apr 16, 2022 6:28 pm
(which he was going to equip with a mounted machine gun to kill liberals with).
You're making this up. I don't believe you.
Says the guy who just lied about gun legality in NY.
"I am not an American ... In my view premarital sex should be illegal" - Ajax18
User avatar
ajax18
God
Posts: 2726
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:12 pm

Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables

Post by ajax18 »

My next replacement will be an electric, as the increases in range combined with the build out of charging stations makes an electric vehicle work. (Not to mention the extension of light rail service).
How would you practice proper socialist distancing guidelines if you were reliant on public transportation and had no automobile?
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 7079
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables

Post by canpakes »

ajax18 wrote:
Sat Apr 16, 2022 7:03 pm
How would you practice proper socialist distancing guidelines if you were reliant on public transportation and had no automobile?
Sit farther apart. ; )
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 3916
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Shifting U.S. to 100% Renewables

Post by Gadianton »

You're making this up. I don't believe you.
Since when do you not believe something just because someone made it up? :lol: Isn't that why there's not going to be debates anymore, because then your guys can't lie through their teeth as easily?

His narrative was defending the constitution and he wasn't totally clear about the scene, but since liberals are weak and anti-gun in his world, how could they possibly be a threat? Well, I'm not sure he'd really thought it through. But somehow the situation was there where he imagined himself racing across an apocalyptic landscape killing liberals in his truck, in service of president Trump. He said he would take a bullet right then and there for Trump. He said he would kill his best friend who is a liberal and who blocked him on Facebook. Wait, he wasn't saying this stuff, he was screaming it. I tried to bait him into saying he'd kill me also, but it didn't work. Well, at a certain point, he must of realized what he was sounding like given he'd provided so little context to all of this, and so near the end of the conversation, if you want to call it that, he explained in regards to his friend he didn't mean he was going to go out and hunt down and kill his friend, but because of the coming war they would find themselves on opposite sides of the battle and in that scenario he would not hesitate to kill his friend out of duty. (not because his feelings were hurt over Facebook or something)

So, I imagine that he had some context of the coming battle for Trump's presidency in mind, but I'm being generous here because the way the conversation started was with his truck, which led directly to the gun in the back killing the enemy, with the enemy being liberals, and at that point there was none of this context.
Post Reply