Just tax the rich.Is it possible yes, is it practically possible in a short time frame…not even close.
why wouldn't it work? Isn't the point of "tax the rich" that the rich aren't paying their fair share?Oh wait that might not work, as it turns out Democrat oligarchs like Michael Bloomberg pay less than half the rate of income tax as average Americans. Even so Bloomberg probably pays a higher rate than Al Sharpton, Charlie Rangel, Jesse Jackson Jr., Maxine Waters, and Patrice Cullors
Five people you detest, all black. What are the chances?ajax18 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 16, 2022 12:39 amJust tax the rich.Is it possible yes, is it practically possible in a short time frame…not even close.
Oh wait that might not work, as it turns out Democrat oligarchs like Michael Bloomberg pay less than half the rate of income tax as average Americans. Even so Bloomberg probably pays a higher rate than Al Sharpton, Charlie Rangel, Jesse Jackson Jr., Maxine Waters, and Patrice Cullors.
You don't know what you're talking about [deleted, FR 2, RI] Teslas go forever because there are fewer moving parts involved. Yes, the battery would likely need to be changed out at 280-300,000 miles, but how many people drive their ICE cars that far in the first place? They typically let the car die on them or trade it in on a newer car. I've never had an ICE above 110,000 miles and that was 30 years ago. Four years ago we had a Kia Sorento SUV that copped out on us at just 48,000 miles. It took them three months to get it fixed because the engine needed replacing. If it had happened just a few months later the warranty wouldn't have covered the cost and I would have had to spend money for a new engine. By the time our car needs a battery replacement the cost is likely going to be far less than what it is today as technology improves.ajax18 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 16, 2022 1:08 amKevin do you plan to drive these electric cars and trucks until they die? You're paying $15k more for this vehicle than an ICE, then when you go to trade it in, you'll be getting $5k less for it than an ICE because you're electric vehicle will need a new battery.
If the rich have found a way to get out of paying the taxes at the rate they should pay now, what makes you think they won't find a way to get out of paying the higher tax rate you legislate upon them? It's no different than gun control or illegal immigration. What good are more laws if you can't/won't enforce the laws that are already on the books? Guns are illegal in New York now. So how did the latest mass shooting suspect manage to get a gun on the subway and unload it on his victims? Well, the police aren't allowed to stop and frisk black men to check for an illegal firearm because that would be considered racial profiling. So exactly what good is more gun control legislation?I'm guessing you're thinking something like, rich Democrats should voluntarily pay double or triple taxes, otherwise they are hypocrites.
That's kind of why nonglobal environmental regulations don't work, isn't it?Let me just explain one thing. A lot of responsible adults out there are willing to take the hit on something, whether it's taxes or something else, but only if everyone else also must take the hit. And this makes sense. If Maxine Waters paid double taxes, it wouldn't make a difference. However, it everyone in that (alleged) income bracket has to pay, it does make a difference.
This true for most people. The company I work for runs a fleet of P/U truck, and foremen and managment drive all over Southern California at any given day. The technology is just not there yet for practical construction fillet use…not to mention trades like concrete, plumbing, electrical etc is critical , and utility beds are a must, and payload is critical.canpakes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 15, 2022 2:55 pmThis is one of the key hurdles for us - range.
Both of our vehicles have around 200K miles on them, but if one of them needs to be replaced any time soon, we’ll need to do so with something that can give significant range through tank size or fuel availability. And there simply isn’t the same sort of charging infrastructure where we drive as may exist in your own more-urban setting.
Next week, I’ll need to check on two projects that are both at least 4 hours driving time away (and with a same-day out and back schedule); both are through areas largely devoid of charging stations along the way, and my schedule won’t allow for any extended time between stops devoted to a slow charge. So, an ICE car is really the only option for this, at the moment.
The other issue is that we’ve always opted for reliable, used cars at reasonable cost. The used car market doesn’t see many choices like that from EV’s yet.
We’d have loved to have been part of the ‘early adopter’ gang, but practically and economically, it doesn’t work out, yet. And for many Americans, the ‘economic’ part of that is still a deal-killer. As example, we like the Rivian’s quirky and handsome look; it would be a very functional replacement for at least one of our decades-old vehicles … but there’s no way that we can even begin to make that price tag work for us.
if it's too easy to get around, then you're right, it won't work. What makes you think that taxes can't be increased in a way that isn't easy to get around?what makes you think they won't find a way to get out of paying the higher tax rate you legislate upon them?
So exactly what good is more gun control legislation?
Interesting that taxes don't work at all, environmental regulations don't work at all, gun control doesn't work at all, but bans on abortion are super effective. eh?That's kind of why nonglobal environmental regulations don't work, isn't it?
