Page 1 of 4
Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 2:06 pm
by Fred
It is my belief that all democrats, without exception, are among the third part of spirits in the pre-existence that saw the advantage of following Lucifer with a body, as opposed to getting kicked out with him. They attempted to fool God into thinking they were following His plan.
Only the most perverse, depraved, twisted, and evil spirits actually believe that the democrat mantra is correct. A spirit of light would never believe such garbage. A democrat can repent, but in so doing, would no longer be a democrat.
Democrats have never been good. Even the JFK democrats were socialists and therefore of the devil. It is not possible for a democrat to be a Christian.
Some people, like the creator of a certain forum, believe that the democrat/republican is a false dichotomy. While it is true that many republicans are merely RINOS, and therefore evil, the possibility does exist that a republican can be a good person. It is not possible for a democrat to be a good person.
Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 2:27 pm
by Res Ipsa
Moved from Mormon side of board, post is primarily political. Put in Paradise, as post is not respectful conversation.
Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 2:45 pm
by Doctor CamNC4Me
Fred wrote: ↑Mon May 16, 2022 2:06 pm
It is my belief that all democrats, without exception, are among the third part of spirits in the pre-existence that saw the advantage of following Lucifer with a body, as opposed to getting kicked out with him. They attempted to fool God into thinking they were following His plan.
Only the most perverse, depraved, twisted, and evil spirits actually believe that the democrat mantra is correct. A spirit of light would never believe such garbage. A democrat can repent, but in so doing, would no longer be a democrat.
Democrats have never been good. Even the JFK democrats were socialists and therefore of the devil. It is not possible for a democrat to be a Christian.
Some people, like the creator of a certain forum, believe that the democrat/republican is a false dichotomy. While it is true that many republicans are merely RINOS, and therefore evil, the possibility does exist that a republican can be a good person. It is not possible for a democrat to be a good person.
Indeed, good man.
I, too, have given this a lot of thought. Yes. Good show. Carry on!
- Doc
Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 2:55 pm
by Doctor Steuss
I always knew there was something fencer-sitter-ish about ole James Faust.
Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 3:17 pm
by Chap
The OP was intended as satire, wasn't it?
Please tell me that it was ... please ...
Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 4:01 pm
by Schreech
Fred wrote: ↑Mon May 16, 2022 2:06 pm
This place is just getting better and better. Drunk spammers with endless time on their hands, nazi sympathizers, full-on holocaust deniers, confused transphobic evangelicals, impotent double-cult racists and now, needy uber right-wing Mormon furries...The future is looking bright! I love the diversity that this little Mormon themed message board has achieved.
Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 4:06 pm
by Atlanticmike
Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 4:08 pm
by Kishkumen
I always find the attempt to judge current political parties by LDS theology to be tiresome.
Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 4:09 pm
by Some Schmo
Chap wrote: ↑Mon May 16, 2022 3:17 pm
The OP was intended as satire, wasn't it?
The sad thing these days is that's it's hard to tell. There really are people that demented.
Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 4:13 pm
by Some Schmo
Kishkumen wrote: ↑Mon May 16, 2022 4:08 pm
I always find the attempt to judge current political parties by LDS theology to be tiresome.
I've never heard a definition of god that didn't sound like a reflection of the values of the person describing it. Every personal god agrees with the person who imagines their personal god.
It would be hilarious if it weren't so pitiful.
