Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 8:51 pm
Literally nothing you wrote invalidated my observations, to include, convictions being overturned, sentencing limited to time served, and a relatively small fine. Nor does it change the fact the “side” working in her favor would be Ajax’s “side.” The fact she was released due to an unforeseen pandemic was, and is, neither here nor there and only serves you in your efforts to be ‘not wrong’. Or are you suggesting had the ‘Coalition for Larping Jurists’ not gotten involved, Ms. Brown would’ve seen the same results, worked out in a deal between her team and the prosecutors?
Anyway. The opening post was posted in bad faith, and you’re just being puckish because you were wrong on the ‘Ajax’ and ‘18’ issue (iT wAs An iNnOcEnT mIsTaKe, gAiZ). But, hey, keep defending the totally-reformed-white-supremacist. You do you.
- Doc
You're killing me here, man. Why are you so obsessed with this? You claim to know Ajax's thought process 15 years ago when he picked a screen name. I didn't say you were wrong. I said I was unwilling to draw a conclusion on the evidence we have. And you just can't leave that alone. Why not?
It's not a winnable argument, unless one of us has Ajax's secret diary for that day and it has an entry about why he picked his screen name and we assume he was being honest. I mean, given that the evidence of what Ajax was actually thinking that day, there's no way to prove or disprove any WAG about what he was thinking when he chose the name. I mean, the luxury of your position is that you can say anything you want and no one will ever be able to prove that you're wrong.
And now you've done exactly the same exercise with me and you're just flat ass wrong. I don't think I "lost." I don't think I "won." I expressed my opinion, which happens to be different from yours. And you just can't leave that alone. You took a difference of opinion and turned it into a dick measuring contest, and then you crowned yourself winner without ever measure dicks because, in this case, it's impossible to actually measure the dicks. And now, you've once again done your mind reader cosplay telling me that I'm sore over losing a contest that I never entered.
You're the one obsessed with turning discussions into dick measuring contests. You asked the question about the sentence. I answered it. How in the friggin world is that trying to win?
Ajax posted about a black woman convicted of fraud. He didn't express any unhappiness that her conviction was reversed and she was granted a new trial. He didn't didn't even address the appellate ruling at all. Your response was what I would call a childish taunt that was not related in any way to what Ajax posted about. Ha! Ha! Neener! Neener! Your side got her out of hot water.!!!! Ha! Ha! You're a dope!!! Jesus Christ, dude.
When I pointed out that it actually didn't get her out of hot water, only a new trial (after she was convicted on the first one), you argued (oddly, without doing the 15 seconds of googling it takes to find out): not if she got a shorter sentence. So I looked up the answer to your question. Then you accused me of trying to win. WTF, man?
If I recall correctly, you once accused me of being controlling. Hilarious projection. You're trying to control who Ajax is. You're trying to control who I am. You can't tolerate the fact that I have a different opinion than you do. You drag a simple difference of opinion into a completely different thread like some kind of bunny boiler.
I am doing me. I will continue to do me. My opinions are my opinions and I don't think about expressions of opinion that are not capable of proof as dick measuring contests. That's all you, bro. I don't think "you do you" means "you do you, but only the way I demand that you do."
Dude, ask yourself. Wouldn't a person who was secure in his conclusions about Ajax have stopped trying to pick a fight long before this? I'm perfectly comfortable in my position.