I think we agree more than we disagree.Morley wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 10:57 pmAnd yet here you are, telling us what you think. And asking us what we think.
As is yours. As are you.
And many women aren’t. And they are not wrong, either.Binger wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 2:22 amAnd, many women are rejecting your conditions and the conditions of this new construct. They don't give two pieces of damnit whether you, or honor, or anyone else has collected them into a set of objects for your soothing and logic. They just dismiss the notion outright, as is their wont. And they are not wrong.
You seem to be saying that some people and some women are upset about the evolving definition of what it means to be a woman——that some women feel offended when classed as people rather than the narrower definition of ‘women’.
I don’t see anyone saying that that isn’t so, or that those feelings are invalid.
It might also be true that there folks who are happy to nudge the definition a little. And that their feelings might also have value.
What do you think?
The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.