Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
Are you saying Atlantic Mike really wants to “F” drag queens? Because it’d be sad that Atlantic Mike really wants to “F” drag queens, but Atlantic Mike can’t “F” drag queens because he’s not being true to his deepest desire to “F” drag queens.
The person in the top photo is clearly wearing a leotard, not just a thong. It doesn't show anything about how the person is dancing, as it is a still shot from the back. The bottom photo is completely decontextualized. It's not clear whether someone is performing or the nature of the performance. And the notion that drag queens dancing is somehow harmful to babies is beyond silly.Lowrance wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 5:02 pmXenophon wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 4:23 pmBefore anyone is going to watch another set of decontextualized videos from you, you'll have to go back and defend the one you already posted that was both intentionally misleading and entirely unsupportive of your assertions.
As it stands now you've been weighed and measured and found quite a bit lacking.
You asked for it, so here are some screenshots taken from one of the videos. The video plays, showing a drag queen in a thong dancibg in a seductive manner while approaching a baby who is crawling around on the floor. I realize that in wokie world, something of that nature is probably considered normal. The second photograph depicts a young child crawling around on a dance floor on which drag queens are performing. Again, everything is returning to its natural state in wokie world.
Do you want to place a wager? I give you my word that in the next five years, drag queens will perform in front of children and babies while wearing giant strap-on dildos, and wokies will try to justify these sick actions of pedophilia by claiming that what they are doing is part of the human experience. I guarantee you that. Without a shadow of a doubt, that occurrence will take place, and people will patiently wait in line outside of libraries to view it.
LOL! Puts the concept of "obscenity" in a whole new light.Some Schmo wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:42 pmI have to admit, the OP did make me uncomfortable. The thought of me going inside a church again sent shivers down my spine.
And that's way before I have to watch a Mormon who thinks he can dance. So yeah, it is not a pretty picture.
Mike, why are you hyper focused on dudes who dress like clown women when we’ve shown you, repeatedly, that the real threat lies with not-drag-queen-men? What’s going on with you?Minnesota Man Gets Less Than 180 Days In Jail For Raping Girls Aged 4 And 9
It's the social contract involved that contextualizes that interaction.Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 10:13 amTheir appeal is that straight men enjoy seeing naked women.
No, it's men seeing naked women that contextualizes the interaction.honorentheos wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:22 pmIt's the social contract involved that contextualizes that interaction.Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 10:13 amTheir appeal is that straight men enjoy seeing naked women.
