Re: Spamming
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2024 4:46 pm
Just so I understand, are you saying it is our job as mods to avoid doing anything that would anger you? Are you saying that we are responsible for what you do when you are angry?
Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
No and no. That's not what I said. I simply don't appreciate the fact that some people are treated differently. However, you are free to do whatever you want. I understand that being a mod isn't easy.
or talk to a brick wall.
The difference is that I don't make stuff up. Just because you don't care about boys falling behind doesn't mean it's spam.Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2024 2:43 pmI’d suggest it’d serve everyone’s interests in that we avoid all the annual Rosebud spam and Rosebud has one thread in which her documentation is collated, so to speak.
Thank you for clarifying. Can you link me to an example of accusations made by you and Doc against each other being treated differently so that I can understand why you think your posts were treated differently?doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:11 pmNo and no. That's not what I said. I simply don't appreciate the fact that some people are treated differently. However, you are free to do whatever you want. I understand that being a mod isn't easy.
People are condemning large age differences when the younger partner is under 25. Look at what Doc just said: he claimed that 19-year-olds aren't adults. How much more evidence do you need?Gadianton wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 4:01 amHold the phone: Doc cam called you a name, Some Schmo said you are a creep for no reason, per you, and IWMP said young people are naïve -- and you think this is overwhelming evidence that society strongly condemns relationships with 10-15 year age differences
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=158575&start=10If anyone truly believes a 19-year-old is an adult I have a bridge over the river Kwai to sell you.
That's relative, or it's nearly impossible come up with precise definitions that would apply to all cases, you smart pants.Some Schmo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2024 4:02 pmYou don't seem to understand what free speech or censorship are.
So you admit that men over 60 marrying young women isn't a good idea?doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 7:26 pm"Ohio man, 81, fatally shoots Uber driver, 61, after scammers target both of them"
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/oh ... rcna147827
It's clear that a lot of people over 60 don't think clearly and their reasoning skills decline, as evidenced by this board.
There are two problems with your response. The first is your own bias toward your own needs at the moment. It just so happens you are in your thirties now -- when you're in your fifties, then what's your response going to be? Are you going to bow out for the greater good, or find a justification for yourself?I agree, but men over 29 marrying young women is probably a good idea.