Re: Shame on you! I am not a right-winger. Here's proof
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:16 pm
Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
Fair enough.Res Ipsa wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 4:55 pm
The mods are addressing what has become an increasing problem with your posting behavior. When you decide that any given post isn't being given the attention you think it observes, you seek more attention by starting a new thread that is, in reality, a continuation of the existing thread. Sometimes you start a new thread in which the OP is literally a response to the last post in an existing thread. Sometimes you attempt to disguise this behavior by claiming you are talking about a new subject, only to make it clear as the "new" thread progresses, that you are talking about same subject as in prior threads. This clutters the board with threads that are all about the same topic and is disrespectful to those who are misled by your OP.
I man up all the time in real life.
No, I do understand that being a moderator is not an easy job.
DT, a person can try to manage their image, but they can't create their image. Whether or not you're red-pill, incel, or right-wing, is not primarily determined by your own claims about yourself. When I said I don't think you're a right-winger (and I've said nothing about the other two), pointing to threads where you've claimed to be this or that make no dent in my perception.unfortunately, Gadiaton didn't read the thread where I clarified that I am not an incel or a red piller
You do cite reputable sources. The problem is, you draw conclusions from these sources that the sources aren't advancing. Remember the CNN video I watched and my criticism of your inferences from it?However, almost everything I say comes from research, newspapers, or respectable sources.
You can't possibly be serious. You've just shot your foot with .400 weatherby, my friend. Thinking-Ape is a "critic of the red-pill" in the same way a neo-Nazi is a critic of Donald Trump and the Republican party. It's been a couple of years, but I've watched 20-30 of Ape's Youtube episodes; let's face it, the guy has a great voice and he articulates the plight of today's man succinctly and matter-of-factly.Here, Thinking-Ape (another critic of the Red Pill ) talks about some of the things I said.
Then why not tough it out here?
I am accepting a lot of things and that's why I won't start new threads here (Spirit forum) anymore.
20 to 30? I have only watched two. Anyways, these guys are aggressive critics of the Red Pill and are left-wing.Gadianton wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 1:08 amThinking-Ape is a "critic of the red-pill" in the same way a neo-Nazi is a critic of Donald Trump and the Republican party. It's been a couple of years, but I've watched 20-30 of Ape's Youtube episodes; let's face it, the guy has a great voice and he articulates the plight of today's man succinctly and matter-of-factly.
You're darn right, DT, Thinking ape backs up a whole lot of what you're saying,
Yes, I said that CNN admitted that women are too picky, but CNN only said that women getting more choosey. So what? It was a clickbait. However, I gave you more sources to show that women in general are getting too picky for the wrong reasons.
You only have to watch about 30 seconds of a single episode to realize he's a big mansphere apologist. Within the first four minutes of this episode, he's already promoting the red pill, and mgtow (men going their own way), he's not a critic of it at all. You must have picked the longest episode he's ever recorded, and I'm not going to sit through the whole thing. His criticism is going to be that not everyone can handle the truth -- you've seen the Matrix, right? That's not being a red pill critic. A couple years later, and he's talking more about the black pill than the red pill. That's also not being a red pill critic in the way you meant it.DT wrote:20 to 30? I have only watched two. Anyways, these guys are aggressive critics of the Red Pill and are left-wing.
Why do you post clickbait??doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 3:29 amYes, I said that CNN admitted that women are too picky, but CNN only said that women getting more choosey. So what? It was a clickbait.
No you didn't.However, I gave you more sources to show that women in general are getting too picky for the wrong reasons.
I hope I am not being presumptuous to expand what I think Marcus may be pointing to. It should be easy to see that it is the right of women to choose for themselves what reasons they want to be picky about. Doubting thomas has zero right to tell them what they should be picky about or to say they are wrong. Other readers like myself have no right to tell women what they should be picky about.Marcus wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:15 amWhy do you post clickbait??doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 3:29 amYes, I said that CNN admitted that women are too picky, but CNN only said that women getting more choosey. So what? It was a clickbait.No you didn't.However, I gave you more sources to show that women in general are getting too picky for the wrong reasons.
not presumptuous at all, your assessment is spot on, in my opinion.huckelberry wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 5:03 amI hope I am not being presumptuous to expand what I think Marcus may be pointing to. It should be easy to see that it is the right of women to choose for themselves what reasons they want to be picky about. Doubting thomas has zero right to tell them what they should be picky about or to say they are wrong. Other readers like myself have no right to tell women what they should be picky about.
excellent question.Doubting Thomas, how is it that you miss this fundamental principal?