TDS

[Moksha]

Hound and Ceeboo, no matter your requests to support Trump, people will still be dissatisfied about what he is doing and will continue to express that dissatisfaction.

Have you considered talking about Trump Coverup Syndrome?

[Some Schmo]

I don’t know how Ceeboo feels about this stuff, and I do not assume he wants the Constitution to be amended to follow Biblical law. But, Dean Robbers’ mention of his Christianity raised my curiosity. How does Ceeboo’s Christianity relate to his MAGAism?

I know you and I differ on our views of ceeboo. I have never really regarded him as an honest poster. Whether the dishonesty was with us or himself is irrelevant; he's a liar.

The only alternate explanation is that he's mentally challenged. I could be persuaded that's the case, and not judge him so harshly. But frankly, I just see ceeboo and think "liar."

[Hound of Heaven]

Ceeboo, if you take a moment to peruse the posts from the progressives on the board over the last 24 hours, it’s crystal clear that these white men are not only grappling with a severe case of Trump derangement syndrome, but they also seem to be card-carrying members of the DEI fan club.

The reason to keep this in mind while perusing their post is that it's as clear as day they harbor a disdain for you simply because you’re a white man in America who happens to cherish the Christian faith.

As I mentioned, Trump swept away all the good stuff from the progressive movement, leaving behind a delightful mix of hatred and a sprinkle of self-loathing. Progressives seem to have a knack for casting white folks as the villains in their grand narrative, while simultaneously handing out the victim cards to everyone else who doesn’t share their hue.

Now, for you and the folks who haven’t caught the Trump derangement bug, we still possess the keen eye to identify racism when it struts its stuff. However, for those afflicted by Trump derangement syndrome, it seems they’ve misplaced their glasses and can’t quite grasp what genuine racism resembles in the year 2025.

Allow me to elucidate the intricate thought processes of an individual grappling with Trump derangement syndrome, so that those perusing this can grasp why Canpakes, Molok, Bishop Schmo, Kishkumen, and Gadianton harbor such disdain for white people, particularly if they happen to be Christian. First and foremost, one must remember that when a progressive spots someone who's not white, they can't help but see a victim in the making.

We see them as a person, a unique individual with the same rights as anyone else strutting around in America. But to someone caught in the whirlwind of Marxist progressivism, it seems that every individual they meet who lacks white skin is instantly cast as a victimm it's as if their Marxist progressive playbook has a chapter dedicated to that very notion.

Progressivism paired with a case of Trump Derangement Syndrome is quite the explosive mix! It's almost comical how progressives, in their fervor, fail to see that slapping a "victim" label on someone the moment you spot them is one of the most irresponsible and misguided things you can do.To call someone a victim solely based on their skin color is to imply that you see them as somehow inferior, all thanks to the hue of their epidermis.

Progressives have spun a narrative where their every action is virtuous, while those who dare to disagree with their Marxist script are deemed villainous. Thus, they feel entirely entitled to wield skin color like a badge of honor or dishonor, or a convenient label, because, after all, they’re on a noble quest to save humanity, one categorization at a time.

So, Ceeboo, as you peruse the delightful critiques from our progressive friends over the last 24 hours, keep in mind that they see your whiteness and Christianity as the grand architects of all the world's woes, not just in America, but globally!

While the folks on this board throwing shade at you and your Christianity are likely all white men, remember that Marxist progressive ideology, paired with a healthy dose of Trump derangement syndrome, has led them to believe that anyone who doesn’t hop on the Marxist bandwagon is public enemy number one.

But here’s the silver lining, Ceeboo! In the last election, Trump managed to snag a hefty slice of the youth vote, outdoing any other Republican in recent memory. He snagged a bigger slice of the black vote, Hispanic voters, and the Asian vote. In other words, folks from every age group and cultural background are getting fed up with the hate and racism that progressives are working overtime to sell us on. As a Democrat, I'd prefer folks throwing their lot in with the Republicans in 2025 rather than aligning with the racially-challenged, Marxist, far-left progressives who seem to have commandeered my party.

[Moksha]

Kishkumen, have you seen the wackadoodle posts by the Regressives on this board? It is like they will have permanent brown stains on their face from Trump's butt. Can you imagine the distastefulness of the job the Secret Service has on Trump's Depends changing duty?

[Kishkumen]

I skimmed Hound's wall of confused nonsense and found nothing worth responding to. It is as though Hound is writing for Ceeboo and some other unknown audience about people and events that have nothing to do with this board. If Ceeboo thinks it connects with this discussion, that is unfortunate, since Hound's communications are pretty close to being thoroughly dishonest, deliberate distortions of reality. If there is a person you can count on being a pretty sober and fair straight shooter, it would be Dean Robbers. He has given Hound the benefit of the doubt more than anyone else, and even he recognizes that Hound's writings as of late have been close to worthless. So, don't listen to me, Ceeboo, listen to Dean Robbers.

If anything, this situation has taught me that I was perhaps a little harsh on Markk, who actually does worthwhile research and makes some worthwhile points. I apologize to Markk for losing my temper and being excessively harsh. I don't agree with Markk, but he is a good-faith interlocutor who does have interest in facts. This is not at all the case with Hound, who seems to be little more than a rhetorical provocateur, chaos agent, and MAGA cheerleader.

[canpakes]

Ah. Hound has gotten to the point of just flat out complaining about how white Christian males are persecuted by everyone who’s not.

Isn’t this just … whining? : D

[Hound of Heaven]

I skimmed Hound's wall of confused nonsense and found nothing worth responding to. It is as though Hound is writing for Ceeboo and some other unknown audience about people and events that have nothing to do with this board. If Ceeboo thinks it connects with this discussion, that is unfortunate, since Hound's communications are pretty close to being thoroughly dishonest, deliberate distortions of reality. If there is a person you can count on being a pretty sober and fair straight shooter, it would be Dean Robbers. He has given Hound the benefit of the doubt more than anyone else, and even he recognizes that Hound's writings as of late have been close to worthless. So, don't listen to me, Ceeboo, listen to Dean Robbers.

If anything, this situation has taught me that I was perhaps a little harsh on Markk, who actually does worthwhile research and makes some worthwhile points. I apologize to Markk for losing my temper and being excessively harsh. I don't agree with Markk, but he is a good-faith interlocutor who does have interest in facts. This is not at all the case with Hound, who seems to be little more than a rhetorical provocateur, chaos agent, and MAGA cheerleader.

I can't help but chuckle at your choice of targets for criticism! Oh, I'm totally cool with you throwing some shade my way! It's like a rite of passage, right? After all, I'm the lone board member brave enough to take a stand against the Marxist progressive ideology that you and your crew seem to have pledged your undying loyalty to. So bring it on!

I understand once you decide to take a stand against the grand circus of Marxism, good luck trying to build a civil and meaningful relationship! It’s like trying to make friends with a porcupine,

I took a peek at your members page and it looks like you've been hanging out here for about five years. Time flies when you're having fun, huh? In the five years you've been here, how often have you bravely stood up to your fellow Marxists when they tossed around terms like "damned retards" at Ceeboo or those other conservatives? You're here for the cathartic experience of bashing on people you love to hate!

You've been a bit tough on Markk, haven't you? Im glad i was able to teach you that! Just like I worked my magic on Bishop Schmo to teach him how to sprinkle some kindness into his life, it seems you're finally realizing that maybe, just maybe, being a little less grumpy with Markk isn't such a bad idea after all! As I mentioned, I'm on a mission to turn all you progressive Marxists into the friendliest folks around, and trust me, I have my own unique approach to make it happen! The board can thank me later.

On a totally different note, how about I hit the pause button on my own thread and dive into the treasure trove of threads you've been busy posting over the last two weeks? They're really having a tough time grabbing any eyeballs, and I have a hunch that if I jumped into your threads, a bunch of folks here would likely trail behind me, giving your threads a much-needed boost past the first page. It's all in your hands, I'm right here for you, Kishkumen!

Again, thanks for admitting my plan to make this board less Marxist is actually working. I hope Markk appreciates you being nicer to him because I was able to convince you to see you are treating him unfairly.

[Kishkumen]

Although nothing Hound has said is anything more or less than rotten tripe, the following whopper requires some rebuttal:

So, Ceeboo, as you peruse the delightful critiques from our progressive friends over the last 24 hours, keep in mind that they see your whiteness and Christianity as the grand architects of all the world's woes, not just in America, but globally!

Absolutely, unequivocally not. Perhaps I should speak for myself.

First, I am not a Progressive, so this comment may not apply to me, but Hound, despite being corrected many times, has continued to call me a Progressive. Ergo, I will say something about this collection of lies.

Race is not inherently the cause of woes. It is just not. Blackness, yellowness, brownness, whiteness. Skin pigmentation is not the cause of evils. For that reason, I reject the idea that skin pigmentation is at the root of the world's problems. To say so is to say something wildly inaccurate and even stupid. Ideologies of race are a problem. Ideologies that make differences of pigmentation the issue will always lose in the end. I have for some time rejected identity politics, not because there are not historical issues related to racial ideologies that have created problems but because new ideologies of the same kind will not, in my opinion, dig anyone out of the present problems caused by such ideologies.

Christianity is not inherently a problem. Christianity brought with it ideas and practices that have improved the lot of many people. I would not want to return to the social and religious world before the existence Christianity. I know I am biased, but that is how I feel about this issue. Christianity is not the cause of today's woes. People are the cause of today's woes. People who happened to be Christians did cause a lot of woes. So too did the followers of other religions and ideologies. The common denominator is humanity. Human beings cause each other many woes. What I like about Christianity is its emphasis on helping the poor, on healing, and on endeavoring to live a virtuous life. I think that Jesus is, on the whole, a superior model for humanity over the Western deities who preceded him.

Hound is a slapdash, sloppy, dishonest asshole. He does not care what he says. All he cares about is driving a wedge between people in support of his political and social agenda.

As I have said many times, I do not hate Ceeboo. I admit that I have said things to Ceeboo in anger. I admit that I have allowed our political differences to come between us at times. But, I really have always genuinely loved Ceeboo, even when he is angry with me. The idea that I hate Ceeboo for being white and Christian is flatly false in every way imaginable. I am sad that Ceeboo supports Trump, that is true, but that is quite different from hating Ceeboo for being white and Christian, which is simply not the case and never has been.

[Kishkumen]

Ah. Hound has gotten to the point of just flat out complaining about how white Christian males are persecuted by everyone who’s not.

Isn’t this just … whining? : D

It is also extremely revealing. This is nothing but the reflexive regurgitations of alt-right, rhetorical-bomb-throwing idiots.

[Gadianton]

I skimmed Hound's wall of confused nonsense and found nothing worth responding to. It is as though Hound is writing for Ceeboo and some other unknown audience about people and events that have nothing to do with this board.

I think there was creativity independent of how the text was generated, as there was some effort behind the elderly persona if nothing else. I would say that the person behind the A.I. has some writing talent worth exploring. I never bothered to check back then, it's no surprise that this latest post is stamped at 100% likely A.I. generated from GPTZero. But then again, Ceeboo had an OP a few months ago linking to a pro-MAGA video on YouTube intended to give us a "different view" of what MAGA is about, which was generated by A.I.. That was far less creative and it wasn't his own work, and so if I had to pick, I'd pick Hound to respond to any day of the week. I suppose if right-wingers want to trade A.I.-generated compliments to each other and that makes them feel good, then have at it, although it is strange to have such a need since they are now living in the golden age as identified by president Trump, and so what could there be left to want for?

But, to be fair to your point, concerning Hound, the cracks in the foundation existed early on. A big miss from the original posts was his confusion between DEI and affirmative action that Sock Puppet identified. It's the kind of thing that I could be confused about, but not an old-school democrat with a self-proclaimed masterful knowledge of his party's history, living his heyday in the 20th century. So that early miss essentially ended the believability but if you ignored that, then it was okay for a while. The downside is that it was an opportunity lost. It's one thing to throw tomatoes at the opposition, but to infiltrate the opposition lends the opportunity to learn something about what the opposition believes, which didn't happen. And so I'd say if there is ever a round two with another character, a basic introduction to concepts such as DEI, progressivism, Marxism, and tariffs would be something to consider learning about. I'm not personally interested in DEI or progressivism, but I am interested in Marxism and tariffs, conceptually at least; I'm not actually interested in having tariffs placed on things I buy! what weirdo would? Who the f would be that stupid?!! lol