MAGA: Why a Trump Vote is the Ultimate Dating Dealbreaker For Women!

[Whiskey]

Start another thread. This thread is not about that.

The report feature can be used in all threads.

You can’t use it to report being rejected for being a Trump voter when asking someone for a date, though.

Well, the good news is that there have been no reports for this thread. Right?

[canpakes]

There's obviously something about voting for a convicted rapist that turns women off. What a shock.

There are actually a host of personality quirks that could be involved, by some accounts.

Vera Papisova has an interesting write-up on how several of her own dates with MAGA fellows turned out -

Part of my whole premise was that no one should reduce anyone else to a one-dimensional symbol just because we know who they voted for. People might think they know all about the people on the other side just because they wear a red hat or because they think women are humans, but really no one knows anything about anyone. My job was to start learning about men who are on the other side of me—way on the other side, in most cases—one guy at a time.
…
<snip various dating experiences>
…
The point is not that we need to save these men or even that they deserve saving. It’s that understanding their loneliness, loss of identity, and fear of irrelevance offers us a way to understand the larger picture of how hate and extremism thrive. Their ideologies are built on rejection—of themselves, the unknown, and the inevitability of change. We breed the isolation that breeds hatred when we reject them without understanding their roots, which are shaped by culture, economy, and society that make them feel entitled to power and terrified of losing it. Too many of us are too comfortable ignoring the systems they cling to because we fail to address the conditions that create them. And we’re clinging to them too. Every time we exile what we fear without trying to understand it. That’s how they’ll win. Again.

The point is: this isn’t about heroes or villains. It’s about humans. And as much as I’d love to inspire you with a big call to action, the truth is action is only as effective as the introspection that precedes it. What part of ourselves is feeding the systems we claim to oppose? What echo chambers are we building that let hate fester elsewhere? What systems thrive on our fear and rejection? It’s about you and me and the stories we need to tell ourselves to find the courage we need to break the cycle. It’s not the tidy resolution anyone wants. It’s the uncomfortable truth we need.

There’s much more in the article, at:

https://verapapisova.substack.com/p/dat ... d-villains

[Whiskey]

Part of my whole premise was that no one should reduce anyone else to a one-dimensional symbol just because we know who they voted for. People might think they know all about the people on the other side just because they wear a red hat or because they think women are humans, but really no one knows anything about anyone. My job was to start learning about men who are on the other side of me—way on the other side, in most cases—one guy at a time.
…
<snip various dating experiences>
…
The point is not that we need to save these men or even that they deserve saving. It’s that understanding their loneliness, loss of identity, and fear of irrelevance offers us a way to understand the larger picture of how hate and extremism thrive. Their ideologies are built on rejection—of themselves, the unknown, and the inevitability of change. We breed the isolation that breeds hatred when we reject them without understanding their roots, which are shaped by culture, economy, and society that make them feel entitled to power and terrified of losing it. Too many of us are too comfortable ignoring the systems they cling to because we fail to address the conditions that create them. And we’re clinging to them too. Every time we exile what we fear without trying to understand it. That’s how they’ll win. Again.

The point is: this isn’t about heroes or villains. It’s about humans. And as much as I’d love to inspire you with a big call to action, the truth is action is only as effective as the introspection that precedes it. What part of ourselves is feeding the systems we claim to oppose? What echo chambers are we building that let hate fester elsewhere? What systems thrive on our fear and rejection? It’s about you and me and the stories we need to tell ourselves to find the courage we need to break the cycle. It’s not the tidy resolution anyone wants. It’s the uncomfortable truth we need.

There’s much more in the article, at:

https://verapapisova.substack.com/p/dat ... d-villains

LMFAO. Holy damned crap. This chick goes "undercover" dating and arrives at these conclusions? Nothing qualifies her more to opine on lost identity than, a fake identity.

damned hell. You really can't make this crap up.

Like I said. The same women that don't want a date with a dude with a truck and a job are also way too good to accept job offers as quarterbacks in the NFL. Same same.

[canpakes]

damned hell. You really can't make this crap up.

That’s the problem. : D

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

The same women that don't want a date with a dude with a truck and a job are also way too good to accept job offers as quarterbacks in the NFL. Same same.

This explains so much.

Whiskey dick didn’t get the woman and he’s been in a state if psychosis ever since.

[Gadianton]

I will point out that Laura Ingram is not married. Nancy Mace, Lauren Boebert, and MTG are all unmarried. Seems like they'd all be capable of finding a good family-values, Christian man who wears a red hat, big beard, and drives a truck.

As for "a job and a truck" -- that's interesting. If somebody says "young doctor with a used Chrysler" the reaction will be, okay, seems all right, whereas "young doctor with Ferrari" gives pause because now you've got a guy for whom image is priority. Why not just say "a career and a vehicle?" Whiskey could just as easily be describing an illegal with a work truck, who should be pulled from his truck, beaten, and thrown in detention, according to the values of Hound. Why not "a job and a house?" Well, it seems to go together, except job could be temporary. It's like ripped from a Country song.

"I've got a job and a truck and I voted for Trump,
yes my dates are going just fine."

[Whiskey]

The same women that don't want a date with a dude with a truck and a job are also way too good to accept job offers as quarterbacks in the NFL. Same same.

This explains so much.

Whiskey dick didn’t get the woman and he’s been in a state if psychosis ever since.

Hey fuckhead. You don't need to advertise just how damned stupid you are. You really don't. Stick to posting pics from your racist and nazi photo collection, you dumbass.

[Whiskey]

I will point out that Laura Ingram is not married. Nancy Mace, Lauren Boebert, and MTG are all unmarried. Seems like they'd all be capable of finding a good family-values, Christian man who wears a red hat, big beard, and drives a truck.

As for "a job and a truck" -- that's interesting. If somebody says "young doctor with a used Chrysler" the reaction will be, okay, seems all right, whereas "young doctor with Ferrari" gives pause because now you've got a guy for whom image is priority. Why not just say "a career and a vehicle?" Whiskey could just as easily be describing an illegal with a work truck, who should be pulled from his truck, beaten, and thrown in detention, according to the values of Hound. Why not "a job and a house?" Well, it seems to go together, except job could be temporary. It's like ripped from a Country song.

"I've got a job and a truck and I voted for Trump,
yes my dates are going just fine."

Keith Olbermann is not married.

[Everybody Wang Chung]

The same women that don't want a date with a dude with a truck and a job are also way too good to accept job offers as quarterbacks in the NFL. Same same.

This explains so much.

Whiskey dick didn’t get the woman and he’s been in a state if psychosis ever since.

Hooch's sock puppet (The Last Danite) has stated a few different times, over at Sic et Non, that he is married to a Chinese national, not that there is anything wrong with that.

[canpakes]

As for "a job and a truck" -- that's interesting.

Does the truck serve as a prop for identity, or a substitute for personality, in this MAGA male dating scenario?

And are truck nuts recommended, too? Does that seal the deal for the potential future Miss MAGA Girlfriend?