DiscussMormonism.com

canpakes wrote: ↑

Fri Jan 01, 2021 5:14 am

subs, do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein is still alive?

subs is not capable of stating what he believes.

and yet i have done so on several points... perhaps the discussion on the topic of "capable" is more appropriate when considering your ability to discern simple statements.

Gadianton wrote: ↑

Fri Jan 01, 2021 5:10 am

subs, do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein is still alive?

I recall a report that he committed suicide in prison. Do you have a contradicting report?
and why do you ask?

I recall a report that he committed suicide in prison. Do you have a contradicting report?
and why do you ask?

Yeah, Lin Wood reported him alive as you saw earlier in this thread.

You dismissed Sasse because you said he didn't support Trump in 2016. Since Wood supports Trump significantly, I wondered if that made him a credible source for you to consider with regards to Epstein.

Gadianton wrote: ↑

Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:31 am

You dismissed Sasse because you said he didn't support Trump in 2016. Since Wood supports Trump significantly, I wondered if that made him a credible source for you to consider with regards to Epstein.

Until Subgenius receives a Republican talking point to the contrary, I suspect Subgenius will err on the side of sanity - as much as it can be comfortably tolerated from a conservative viewpoint.

subgenius wrote: ↑

Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:05 am

canpakes wrote: ↑

Fri Jan 01, 2021 5:14 am

subs is not capable of stating what he believes.

and yet i have done so on several points... perhaps the discussion on the topic of "capable" is more appropriate when considering your ability to discern simple statements.

Nope. You got nothin’. Or you could show it.

canpakes wrote: ↑

Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:08 am

subgenius wrote: ↑

Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:05 am

and yet i have done so on several points... perhaps the discussion on the topic of "capable" is more appropriate when considering your ability to discern simple statements.

Nope. You got nothin’. Or you could show it.

I fail to see where i need to prove your claim, but we all know you specialize in seeing that which has never been.

subgenius wrote: ↑

Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:38 pm

canpakes wrote: ↑

Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:08 am

Nope. You got nothin’. Or you could show it.

I fail to see where i need to prove your claim, but we all know you specialize in seeing that which has never been.

You’re just misunderstanding the process, as usual.

You need to assert your claim, maybe even dare to try and prove it. You’ve done neither, and nothing more than complain when someone asks you what you believe.

You are too cowardly to assert a belief in whatever you insinuate. You stand for nothing.

Gadianton wrote: ↑

Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:31 am

I recall a report that he committed suicide in prison. Do you have a contradicting report?
and why do you ask?

Yeah, Lin Wood reported him alive as you saw earlier in this thread.

You dismissed Sasse because you said he didn't support Trump in 2016. Since Wood supports Trump significantly, I wondered if that made him a credible source for you to consider with regards to Epstein.

My dismissal of Sasse was clearly framed as a portrait of the fallacy via anecdote in that post.
But feel free to retell it in a way that makes your thoughts comfortable.
But, again, why do you ask?

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... +Doc+1.pdf
California's 55 electoral votes for Biden suddenly targeted in brand-new action. Decertification demanded amid 700 affidavits of 'irregularities and fraud'. A lawsuit accuses California officials of rampant election-code violations and fraud that irreparably contaminated the results of the 2020 election.
"The lack of integrity in our elections strikes at the heart of our republic," said Joshua Kroot of Primary Law Group, one of the teams working on the case on behalf of the Election Integrity Project. While more than 60 lawsuits have been filed following the Nov. 3 general election on behalf of President Trump, the complaint goes further, challenging the entire election procedure in California. It also is significant because it requires the decertification of California's November election results, a move that by itself, could deprive Joe Biden of the presidency.