Shout Out to Shulem!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

The sketch was a failure

Post by Shulem »

DIALOGUE: A Journal of Mormon Thought; Autumn 1968 wrote:If the sketch were later than the cut in PGP, one would expect it to resemble the "Facsimile"; if, on the other hand, Joseph Smith had drawn it himself (or had it drawn) in order to replace a part of the papyrus that had been damaged after it came into his possession, one would still expect the two versions to resemble each other. The likeliest interpretation of the difference is that the sketch on the backing fills an already existing gap in a manner that Joseph Smith himself rejected as unsatisfactory. In addition, as we have already seen, the Egyptian parallels to the missing portions of the vignette resemble neither the sketch nor "Facsimile No. 1."

THE BREATHING PERMIT OF HOR -- Klaus Baer

"Joseph Smith himself rejected as unsatisfactory"

Image

I have to agree that Joseph Smith rejected the doodling above as unsatisfactory. He must have also rejected Hedlock's original carving of the jackal head in the lead printing plate of Facsimile No. 3, and by his AUTHORITY (President of the Church and Chief Editor), the snout was scraped out leaving a mutated animal head behind with the jackal eye and a single canine ear. This is absolute proof that Fig. 6., is Anubis whose name is given in the characters above his head.

Image
Wikipedia wrote:Anubis from the original printing plate, where it appears that the nose was scraped off.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

They lied

Post by Shulem »

Shulem wrote:
Thu Jan 28, 2021 10:20 pm
Joseph Smith . . . . rejected Hedlock's original carving of the jackal head in the lead printing plate of Facsimile No. 3, and by his AUTHORITY (President of the Church and Chief Editor), the snout was scraped out leaving a mutated animal head behind with the jackal eye and a single canine ear. This is absolute proof that Fig. 6., is Anubis whose name is given in the characters above his head.

Image
Wikipedia wrote:Anubis from the original printing plate, where it appears that the nose was scraped off.

deception
: the act of causing someone to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid : the act of deceiving


lie
: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive


false
: not genuine
: intentionally untrue
: adjusted or made so as to deceive
: intended or tending to mislead
: not true



The evidence is conclusive. Joseph Smith and Reuben Hedlock lied. There can be no doubt they deceived the Church by altering the lead printing plate which was to act as mirror and copy the image from the original papyrus representing the very image of the person of Anubis in Fig. 6., of Facsimile No. 3.

Smith and Hedlock are guilty as charged!

I defy anyone in the Church to prove otherwise. Come on John Gee -- put up or shut up. You KNOW the truth but you continue to lie for the Church in order to collect your BYU salary and fees. There isn't a single Egyptologist outside the Church that will back you.

The Church must be sued for slander and lying. John Gee should be sued too for supporting those lies in order to collect a salary and fees!
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Shout Out to Shulem!

Post by Shulem »

Moksha wrote:
Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:50 am
The snout shall have its day in court thanks to Shulem and Consiglieri.

Professor Gee followed in the the footsteps of Hugh Nibley (defuncted Egyptological apologist) who entertained the idea that the two goddesses depicted in Facsimile No. 3, may have in all actuality been men dressing up as women in some kind of ritual wherein Joseph Smith's "King" (Fig. 2) and "Prince" (Fig. 4) were assuming the roles of Isis and Maat, respectively. Hence, two persons labeled by Smith as males in the Facsimile were dressed up in female ceremonious garb in order to satisfy Smith's explanation that they were men -- a King and Prince.
Dr. Gee wrote:Facsimile 3 has received the least attention. The principal complaint raised by critics has been regarding the female attire worn by figures 2 and 4, who are identified as male royalty. It has been documented, however, that on certain occasions, for certain ritual purposes, some Egyptian men dressed up as women.

If it will please the court, every Egyptologist (except perhaps the Mormon ones) will identity the two persons in question as the actual goddesses: Isis and Maat, and the persons in the Facsimile representation are not performing a certain ritual whereby earthly men impersonate goddesses who live in heaven. The hieroglyphic inscriptions above the persons in question clearly label the names and titles of the persons below as being Isis and Maat, respectively. Hence, the gender of the persons in the Facsimile are female in character -- with or without clothing, they are female.

In addition to Mormon deception in misidentifying the characters of the persons mentioned above, the Mormons (including Dr. Gee) defend Smith's erroneous interpretation that the scene portrays an earthly event depicting a pharaoh's court in Egypt. Nothing could be further from the truth and I assert that Dr. Gee knows this but continues to sponsor apologetic lies in defending Smith's false translations. Dr. Gee is well aware of the meaning of the hieroglyphic inscription at the bottom of the Facsimile:
Dr. Ritner wrote:O gods of the necropolis, gods of the caverns, gods of the south, north, west and east, grant salvation to the Osiris Hôr, the justified, born by Taikhibit.

According to Egyptologists, the scene of Facsimile No. 3, takes place in the netherworld, the afterlife, and is a ceremonious event for the character Hôr (Fig. 5). But Smith and the Mormons, erroneously claim that the scene takes place in Egypt in a mortal setting, which is the furthest from the truth because in reality the persons in the scene are in heaven and are immortal. Smith obviously recognized the frieze containing a row of stars in the upper section of the vignette and likely associated them with his erroneous introduction of the Asiatic biblical character of Abraham "reasoning upon the principles of Astronomy, in the king’s court." But the stars in the upper register or frieze have nothing to do with biblical Abraham reasoning with Egyptians about astronomy whether on earth or in heaven. I assert that Dr. Gee is well aware of this and knows that the stars in the vignette are designed for the very purpose of identifying the scene as heavenly in nature -- a part of the afterlife.

Dr. Gee is well aware that the persons in the Facsimile are "dwellers in the netherworld" (dwAt ii w), and that the characters are immortal gods and goddesses who welcome Hôr (a dead man) into the afterlife to live forever in the divine presence of the gods. The scene is NOT earthly! Joseph Smith's interpretation was false and the Mormon Church continues to deceive new converts in leading them to believe that Smith translated the papyrus correctly.

Dr. Gee knows full well that Egyptologists know the Facsimile scene as a funerary spell and ritual that takes place in the "starry sky" (xAbAs), in the very heavens whereby each "star" (sbA) in the frieze serves as a testament that the scene is not of this earth.

Now, considering what the Mormons and Dr. Gee have said about Fig. 6., is beyond the pale; nothing could be further from the truth! The slander committed by Mormons and professors at BYU deserve every attention of the court of public opinion whereby their guilt may be fully established. They bring converts into the church by claiming Joseph Smith could translate Egyptian. The criminal nature of the Mormons must be met with justice and truth. The Church continues to sponsor its false advertising by publishing mistranslations of Joseph Smith as contained in the Facsimiles of the Book of Abraham. This must stop.

Yes, let's talk about Anubis, Dr. Gee.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Shout Out to Shulem!

Post by Shulem »

consiglieri wrote:
Tue Jan 12, 2021 7:10 pm
Just wanted Shulem to know his discovery is now part and parcel of the lawsuit against the Church, and is part of the record.

Wouldn't this make for a great pay day!

:P


____________________________
SHULEM, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly
situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CORPORATION OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH
OF JESUS CHRIST OF
LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a Utah
corporation sole.

Defendant

____________________________


All living persons who were excommunicated for challenging false claims of the Church pertaining to the Book of Abraham and all living persons who voluntarily resigned from the Church because of those false claims made by the Church will receive the amount of $1,000,000 to be paid from funds held in Church accounts. Proof of eligibility will be ascertained and determined by records held in possession of the Plaintiff and the Defendant wherein questions pertaining to the legitimate claims of the Book of Abraham were raised and challenged.

Shulem wrote:Member Records Division, LDS Church
50 E North Temple Rm 1372
SLC UT 84150-5310

It upsets me that the LDS Church continues to mock the ancient Egyptian religion by publishing the Explanations of Facsimile No. 3 wherein Joseph Smith mistakenly called a god of Egypt a slave, presumably because Anubis is black. Modern Egyptology has proven that Joseph Smith’s translations are false. There is no king’s name written in the writing and the name Shulem is not contained in the Egyptian hieroglyphic text as Joseph Smith claimed. Joseph Smith also made up the Book of Mormon which is nothing but a book of fiction.

Restitution in full:

Image

:D

consiglieri, you need to resign now in order to qualify for your 1 million judgment.
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 5810
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Shout Out to Shulem!

Post by Moksha »

Dr. Gee wrote:Facsimile 3 has received the least attention. The principal complaint raised by critics has been regarding the female attire worn by figures 2 and 4, who are identified as male royalty. It has been documented, however, that on certain occasions, for certain ritual purposes, some Egyptian men dressed up as women.
Was this some sort of apologetic for the operatic performances of Madam Pattirini on the stages of Utah (or a cover-up in case the cross-dressing antics of the Council of Fifty was ever discovered)?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Shout Out to Shulem!

Post by Shulem »

Moksha wrote:
Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:22 am
Dr. Gee wrote:Facsimile 3 has received the least attention. The principal complaint raised by critics has been regarding the female attire worn by figures 2 and 4, who are identified as male royalty. It has been documented, however, that on certain occasions, for certain ritual purposes, some Egyptian men dressed up as women.
Was this some sort of apologetic for the operatic performances of Madam Pattirini on the stages of Utah (or a cover-up in case the cross-dressing antics of the Council of Fifty was ever discovered)?

Madam Pattirini wrote:
I'll get my tits and ass printed on the front cover of Facsimile No. 3, if it's the last thing I ever do.

Image

Who will be Fig. 4?
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Shout Out to Anubis!

Post by Shulem »

The Mysteries of Freemasonry wrote:
Anubis, Thot, Menes, Osiris, and others whom they lodged in the stars, passed for the term of the terrestrial life of these gods. Such is indeed the true origin of that antiquity of the Egyptian history, which they trace back so very high.

See also the following link to view quote in book:

EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES,
OR
RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS
OF THE ANCIENT
EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS,
ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF
FREEMASONRY.
BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M.
NEW-YORK:
1835.


I've made my case that educated Masons in Smith's time and place knew more about the mysteries of Anubis than perhaps any of us have realized. The link above will take you to a citation published in 1835 in a New York book. Apparently, the Masons were very familiar with what the Greeks had passed down through their history -- and ANUBIS was known as the Dog Star and they knew about the Sothic Star cycle.

Folks this is big! If you have been following this thread and have taken interest then you are no doubt getting informed.

A case has been made. Smith had to have known about Anubis at the time of printing the test run for Facsimile No. 3, whereby he came to realize he couldn't depict Anubis in jackal head form because he had already revealed earlier that the black person was a slave and that would reveal the contradiction and discredit his translation.

Folks. I do believe I have figured it out and solved the mystery for why the snout was hacked out. Will the apologists take notice? That is hard to say. The apologists are generally hard hearted and closed minded in doing anything and everything to protect their so-called testimonies. But, I have to say, the ANUBIS snout issue is much bigger than we realize. It cuts to the heart of the matter. It reveals how Smith was actually cheating and lying in knowing firsthand that he was making up his translations out of thin air and that he couldn't really read Egyptian. So he had Hedlock hack out the snout and kept it hush, hush. Maybe John Taylor knew, and figured Joseph was correcting matters to validate his translations. Impossible to say unless he mentioned something in a journal or letter that I've not been able to dig up.

Consiglieri, I hope you are taking notice and putting the pieces together as I am. I do believe this issue is going to magnify and snowball into a monster for Church apologists. The scraping off of Anubis's nose is a sure sign of a coverup and the Masonic connection exposes the underlying motivation for removing the snout. When you think about it, there simply is no other reasonable or logical explanation for removing the snout other than for the reasons I've proposed in this thread and on my website.
Last edited by Shulem on Tue Feb 02, 2021 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Important Masonry References, 1835 New-York:

Post by Shulem »

EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES,
OR
RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS
OF THE ANCIENT
EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS,
ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF
FREEMASONRY.
BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M.
NEW-YORK:
1835.


EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (EXPLANATION OF THE FRONTISPIECE) wrote:
The Blazing Star is Anubis, the Dog-star; whose rising forewarned the Egyptians of the approach of the overflowing of the Nile. Hence the great veneration in which it was held by them, and which has descended to the Freemasons.
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (EXPLANATION OF THE FRONTISPIECE) wrote:
Among the emblems of masonry, in Cross's Chart, is the figure of a Key, which is, also generally displayed in Masonic monitors. The Key was the attribute of Anubis, the Dog-star, in afternoons dominated Mercury, and indicated the closing of one year, and opening of another; because the Egyptians formerly commenced the year at the rising of this star.
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 6) wrote:
I warned them of the danger; whereupon they called it Thaaut or Tayaut, the dog; they called it also the barker, the monitor, in Egyptian, Anubis;
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 7) wrote:
I will hereby remark, that the Anubis or Dog-Star, so useful to the ancient Egyptians is the Blazing-Star of masonry; and although the craft are ignorant of its origin as a masonic symbol, they are actually taught the moral drawn from its original emblematical use.

"The names given to this public sign were Anubis the barker, the giver of advices, or Tahaut the dog." The meaning then that has been handed down to masons of the blazing-star, completely identifies it with Anubis the dog-star.
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 15) wrote:
Death and Resurrection of Osiris.

To the above is superadded a large Anubis, who with an empathic gesture, turning towards Isis who has an empty throne on her head . . . . The position of the Master mason, when in the act of raising Hiram, is a fac simile of that of Anubis over the body of Osiris.
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 37) wrote:
The names given to this public sign were Anubis the barker, the giver of advices or Tahaut the dog, or AEsculapius the man dog. * It was still the same meaning or same public sign; but they were three names for one and the same thing. A sufficient ground for them to derive from thence three personages of their history, the chronology whereof will be still lengthened by this means. They make their demi-god Anubis to reign before Menes, without telling us where.
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 38) wrote:
But it was very superfluous, here to have recourse to means of reconciliation; since AEsculapius or the man-dog, and the Tahaut, or the dog-star, as well as Anubis, were no more than the names of one figure that was exposed in the assembly of the people, to warn them of the appearance of that star, the rising of which would soon be succeeded by the inundation. *
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 48) wrote:
These calculations found in the registers of the most laborious among the learned, being always joined with names of men such as Anubis, Thot, Menes, Osiris, and others whom they lodged in the stars, passed for the term of the terrestrial life of these gods.

The dog-star has already afforded us two deities, one residing in the fine star near Cancer, under the name of Thot or of Anubis, and very well employed in the swelling and sinking the river Nile,
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 50) wrote:
But they still observed the custom of making the god Anubis who was the door-keeper of the feasts, to proceed the pomp of Isis, which was the first feast of the year;
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 51) wrote:
Anubis as considered as a symbol, was in reality the rule of the feasts, and the introducer of all the symbolic figures that were successfully shown to the people during the whole year. When a god, he was made inventor and regulator of these feasts.

This they made the noblest function of Anubis; and it was with regard to this frivolous opinion, that the pomp of Isis was always proceeded by a dog.
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 52) wrote:
The compasses and square, of which he is made the inventor, are no other than the compasses and square that were put into the hands of Anubis or Horus, to warn the husbandmen to be in readiness to measure their lands, to take angles in order to distinguish them from the lands of others. Thus he was made the inventor of the symbolical instruments they saw in their hands.
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 53) wrote:
The first answers to the Supreme Intelligence; the second to Osiris the sun; the third to Isis; and the fourth to Anubis.
EXPOSITION OF THE MYSTERIES, OR RELIGIOUS DOGMAS AND CUSTOMS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, PYTHAGOREANS, AND DRUIDS, ALSO: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ORIGIN, HISTORY, AND PURPORT OF FREEMASONRY. BY JOHN FELLOWS, A.M. NEW-YORK: 1835 (PAGE 79) wrote:
The fourth was called the messenger of the gods, or Mercury, which corresponds to the Egyptian Anubis, with his dog's head and measure of the Nile,
Etc.

Dear John Gee,

You are in serious, hot water. You do realize you are going to have to answer for all of this? You know that Anubis in Facsimile No. 3, is an Egyptian god known to Freemasonry and you must come to terms that his snout was viciously hacked out of the lead plate.

Shulem
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Two months prior to publishing Facsimile No. 3

Post by Shulem »

Joseph Smith Papers wrote:Joseph Smith’s Masonic Apron

Image

Circa 1842–1844. Abraham Jonas, Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Illinois, formally organized a Masonic lodge in Nauvoo, Illinois, on 15 March 1842. Although a number of Latter-day Saints had joined the fraternity previously, Joseph Smith had not. He was initiated into Freemasonry on 15 March and raised a Master Mason the following day. Masons wore aprons to symbolically protect their clothing. Smith's personal apron, shown here, was made of silk backed with muslin. (Courtesy Community of Christ Library-Archives, Independence, MO. Photograph by Val Brinkerhoff.)

What masonic mysteries did Joseph Smith discover regarding ancient Egypt and Anubis when he became a Master Mason just two months prior to publishing the Facsimile No. 3, in the Times and Seasons? Surely he had Freemasonry books on hand and was a voracious reader!

Stay tuned to this thread!
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7090
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Shout Out to Shulem!

Post by Shulem »

Lem,

I understand the Nauvoo Masonic Lodge was organized on December 29, 1841, but Joseph had not joined until March 15th, the SAME day the 2nd installment of the Book of Abraham (including Facsimile No. 2) was formerly published in the Times and Seasons. It seems it was a busy day for the prophet! At this point, I have no idea how much preparation or involvement he personally may have had with masonry prior to officially joining and becoming an apprentice.

The Facsimile No. 1, was published on March, 1, 1842, BEFORE Smith was formerly initiated into masonry, whereafter he learned finer points of Egyptian symbolism and mystery from books available at the time. This leads me to further question how much Smith may have known about Anubis's jackal-head prior to March 1st; when considering the idea he and/or an accomplice may have intentionally removed the head from the fragment.

More to think about....
Post Reply