Jason Bourne wrote:I asked if 10% would have made up the differential.
No you didn't. You said you didn't think it would. And I said that was a pretty dumb thing to assume.
I said:
Would the tithing differential have prevented them borrowing on their house
And I stand by it. I do no think it would have. Based on how much debt most people have, and most do not pay tithing, they most likely would have still borrowed on their house. Tithing in typically not the problem. Lack of budgeting and planning is. I think it is pretty dumb to assume that all of the sudden having 10% more solves someone's financial problems.
They may have had less if they said "Let us now take this 10% and use it to pay down debt, or save iun an emergency fund or so on. But my point, which you missed, is that tithing is typically not the root of peoples money problems.
Yes and that is my point. Any active LDS ought budget for the 10%. If they are going to pay it and live it they should plan on it going out the door just like any other monthly bill. Most, if they do this, will not have a problem with paying it and meeting other costs of living. And keep in mind that if they deduct this on their taxes it is more like about 6.5% to 8% depending on their tax bracket.
Of course. When you spend more than you earn, you get into trouble. Without the tithing, they would have been spending 10% less than they were spending - which would make a big impact. Guessing as to whether they would have squandered that additional 10% is just that - a guess. You assumed it would be the case for them, and I was simply pointing out that that was a dumb thing to assume.
And it is just as dumb for you to assume that they would not have squandered it. Further, I did not say they would have squandered it. Even if they took it and applied it all to debt it may well not have solved their problems.
But I'm guessing you and I would both agree - that if you're paying tithing, you need to work off the assumption that you have 10% less income than you actually have. And if you buy a house that you can't afford based on that assumption, that is bad money management.