Mormon Heroes

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Tidejwe
_Emeritus
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:14 am

Mormon Heroes

Post by _Tidejwe »

I am curious who you would consider to be a "hero" in general terms from within the ranks of Mormonism and why?

For me, I'd have to Say the following are SOME of my Heroes (no particular order):

Hugh B Brown: Did the most in my opinion, fighting against all odds and Harold B Lee, etc to be a pioneer in removing the Priesthood Ban on blacks and denouncing it as a policy and declaring it was unfounded, not a revelation and not a doctrine. He convinced every apostle but Harold B Lee it was time to remove the ban since back in the 60's! If it weren't for HBL, it would've happened more than a decade earlier due to HBB leading the way.

D Michael Quinn: Even after being ex'd, the man still believes the church was divinely inspired, but still is fallible. He presented truth and history in the way he truly believed was correct regardless of the consequences. Had he compromised his historical integrity and followed Packer, et al by not telling all "Uninspiring Historical Truths" he likely could've become a great leader in the LDS church (as SWK promised him for example). He was at one time, one of the most respected LDS figures when he worked at BYU. He's provided more history and sources (and NEW sources) than any other LDS historian I know of. His belief and efforts found him in the cross-hairs of Packer, etc and paid the highest price possible in the church organization for one who believes it was divinely inspired.

Bishop Edward Bunker: The first person to actually stand up and declare the Adam God Doctrine was a bunch of BS. He went through several tribunals and was almost excommunicated because he refused to be silenced or state that he was wrong and the Adam God Doctrine was true. If it weren't for this man, we'd probably still be listening to that stupid "Lecture at the Veil" as Brigham wrote it saying that Adam lived on another Earth, got the priesthood, married many wives, died, was resurrected, became exalted, had spirit children, then came back to Earth as a mortal and then had mortal children to bring his spirit children down to Earth. Edward Bunker had a lot to lose fighting against the AGD, but his story is downright amazing.

Jeffrey Nielsen: Lost his job at BYU for voicing his disgust with the church trying to push political agendas on the Gay Marriage act...making statements be read in sacrament meeting and everything. Besides losing his job, imagine how this possibly affected him socially/culturally, etc. He stood up for what was right (in my opinion) and took the consequences for it.

Richard Lyman Bushman: Printed the first biography that is accepted and read and enjoyed by both believers and non-believers. He tries to be honest with history of the church, but presents it from a stance that makes it possible to believe.

Trent D Stephens; D Jeffrey Meldrum; Forrest B Peterson: they helped write one of the first widespread LDS books pushing for simultaneous belief in BOTH Evolution AND Mormonism. All too often LDS believe that Evolution is "EVIL" and invented by SATAN as JFS and BRM had pushed in the past. Such thoughts on evolution are still prevalent among members today, but these men made more a difference in my opinion than anyone else in regards to belief in Evolution in Mormonism.

J Golden Kimball: LOL Why not?

Joseph Smith: Sure, the man had his faults, but who hasn't? Undeniably, this man is probably the most important figure in Mormonism. I'll let others detail out reasons why, since I'm sure a lot of members will also list him anyway.
~Active NOM who doesn’t believe much of the dogma or TRADITIONS but maintains membership for cultural, social & SPIRITUAL REASONS, recognizes BOTH good & bad in the Church & [has] determined the Church doesn’t have to be perfect to remain useful. -Served mission in Haiti, holds temple recommend etc
_rcrocket

Post by _rcrocket »

Jean Baptiste
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

I am curious who you would consider to be a "hero" in general terms from within the ranks of Mormonism and why?

For me, I'd have to Say the following are SOME of my Heroes (no particular order):

Hugh B Brown: Did the most in my opinion, fighting against all odds and Harold B Lee, etc to be a pioneer in removing the Priesthood Ban on blacks and denouncing it as a policy and declaring it was unfounded, not a revelation and not a doctrine. He convinced every apostle but Harold B Lee it was time to remove the ban since back in the 60's! If it weren't for HBL, it would've happened more than a decade earlier due to HBB leading the way.


What is your sources for the claim that Brown "fought against" Harold B. Lee? Brown was a faithful Apostle and knew perfectly well that he had no authority to alter the Church's policy without revelation from the Lord and the unanimity of the Brethren.

D Michael Quinn: Even after being ex'd, the man still believes the church was divinely inspired, but still is fallible.


No, the Church isn't fallible, only the Brethren, and only when stating their own opinions or philosophies. Quinn is also highly fallible, and nobody-nobody-ever requested that he steady the Ark. We have a great deal of Ark steading going on around here, by the way.

He presented truth and history in the way he truly believed was correct regardless of the consequences. Had he compromised his historical integrity and followed Packer, et al by not telling all "Uninspiring Historical Truths" he likely could've become a great leader in the LDS church (as SWK promised him for example). He was at one time, one of the most respected LDS figures when he worked at BYU. He's provided more history and sources (and NEW sources) than any other LDS historian I know of. His belief and efforts found him in the cross-hairs of Packer, etc and paid the highest price possible in the church organization for one who believes it was divinely inspired.


So, Quinn sacrificed his possible Apostolic calling for his own ego.


Bishop Edward Bunker: The first person to actually stand up and declare the Adam God Doctrine was a bunch of BS. He went through several tribunals and was almost excommunicated because he refused to be silenced or state that he was wrong and the Adam God Doctrine was true. If it weren't for this man, we'd probably still be listening to that stupid "Lecture at the Veil" as Brigham wrote it saying that Adam lived on another Earth, got the priesthood, married many wives, died, was resurrected, became exalted, had spirit children, then came back to Earth as a mortal and then had mortal children to bring his spirit children down to Earth. Edward Bunker had a lot to lose fighting against the AGD, but his story is downright amazing.


Joseph Fielding Smith said the idea was B.S. several generations ago, as did McConkie et al. Another egocentric looking for attention and controversy, apparently. Color me unimpressed. The lecture at the Veil never had a particle of legitimacy as Church doctrine, and Young never taught these ideas publically.

Jeffrey Nielsen: Lost his job at BYU for voicing his disgust with the church trying to push political agendas on the Gay Marriage act...making statements be read in sacrament meeting and everything. Besides losing his job, imagine how this possibly affected him socially/culturally, etc. He stood up for what was right (in my opinion) and took the consequences for it.


In other words, Nielsen didn't like the Church's position of homosexual marriage and got pissy about it. I'm dubious about people who don't like the Church fulfilling one of its primary missions, to call the culture to repentance, point out cultural dangers, and hold the culture's fee to the fire.


Trent D Stephens; D Jeffrey Meldrum; Forrest B Peterson: they helped write one of the first widespread LDS books pushing for simultaneous belief in BOTH Evolution AND Mormonism. All too often LDS believe that Evolution is "EVIL" and invented by SATAN as JFS and BRM had pushed in the past. Such thoughts on evolution are still prevalent among members today, but these men made more a difference in my opinion than anyone else in regards to belief in Evolution in Mormonism.


I've never heard of either but I'd be willing to give their work a good going over. This is an evolving (no pun intended), discussion within the Church.
Last edited by Dr. Sunstoned on Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
_Abinadi's Fire
_Emeritus
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:49 pm

Post by _Abinadi's Fire »

B. H. Roberts.

edited to add why: I think it took a lot of guts for him to look at things from a different perspective.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

Names withheld to protect the innocent:

First Bishop in my current ward: Taught me what compassion really means, the difference between doctrine and practice, and helped me through the roughest patch of my life.

My Father: Excelled in that he juggled administrative callings in the Church, held lots of positions that start with C and end with O, and still had time for us (all 7 of us).

My Mother: For being a leader to everyone around her and a friend to everyone she met.

My Second Mission President: For showing me how we are supposed to teach.

God: For Saving me.

That'll work.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by _Scottie »

Of course, everyone on [url=http://famousmormons.net/[/url]www.famousmormons.net[/url].
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

Coggins7 wrote:I am curious who you would consider to be a "hero" in general terms from within the ranks of Mormonism and why?

For me, I'd have to Say the following are SOME of my Heroes (no particular order):

Hugh B Brown: Did the most in my opinion, fighting against all odds and Harold B Lee, etc to be a pioneer in removing the Priesthood Ban on blacks and denouncing it as a policy and declaring it was unfounded, not a revelation and not a doctrine. He convinced every apostle but Harold B Lee it was time to remove the ban since back in the 60's! If it weren't for HBL, it would've happened more than a decade earlier due to HBB leading the way.

What is your sources for the claim that Brown "fought against" Harold B. Lee? Brown was a faithful Apostle and knew perfectly well that he had no authority to alter the Church's policy without revelation from the Lord and the unanimity of the Brethren.


The policy was inevitably altered with a vote. The vote could have been a decade earlier if HBL had not demanded another vote. Wouldn't it have been so much better to do the right thing sooner?

Bishop Edward Bunker: The first person to actually stand up and declare the Adam God Doctrine was a bunch of BS. He went through several tribunals and was almost excommunicated because he refused to be silenced or state that he was wrong and the Adam God Doctrine was true. If it weren't for this man, we'd probably still be listening to that stupid "Lecture at the Veil" as Brigham wrote it saying that Adam lived on another Earth, got the priesthood, married many wives, died, was resurrected, became exalted, had spirit children, then came back to Earth as a mortal and then had mortal children to bring his spirit children down to Earth. Edward Bunker had a lot to lose fighting against the AGD, but his story is downright amazing.


Joseph Fielding Smith said the idea was B.S. several generations ago, as did McConkie et al. Another egocentric looking for attention and controversy, apparently. Color me unimpressed. The lecture at the Veil never had a particle of legitimacy as Church doctrine, and Young never taught these ideas publicly.


However, Bishop Bunker took this on several decades earlier, when it was in taught by the Church and at great personal expense. Did he not do the right thing? Are all acts of bravery to be regarded as egocentric?

Jeffrey Nielsen: Lost his job at BYU for voicing his disgust with the church trying to push political agendas on the Gay Marriage act...making statements be read in sacrament meeting and everything. Besides losing his job, imagine how this possibly affected him socially/culturally, etc. He stood up for what was right (in my opinion) and took the consequences for it.

In other words, Nielsen didn't like the Church's position of homosexual marriage and got pissy about it. I'm dubious about people who don't like the Church fulfilling one of its primary missions, to call the culture to repentance, point out cultural dangers, and hold the culture's fee to the fire.


Hold the culture's feet to the fire? So what if Infymus took this on as his mission statement?


...
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Swot_on_her_knees

Post by _Swot_on_her_knees »

Jesus Christ of course. Without him there would be NO Mormonism.
Joseph Smith. The founder.
Elder [.....]. For teaching me so much and being a good friend.
Brother [........]. for baptizing me.
God. God is the greatest and the upmost respectable hero.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

Uncle Jim, for being a Saint worthy of the name.
Shirla, for so many things, I cannot mention them all.
Bishop M, for standing up for my son, for putting the person ahead of the law.
Chieko Okazaki, for showing that women with careers aren't evil.
Zenobia, for walking the same line I do, only much better.
Peggy Rogers, for being the true spirit of the Fringe.
_sunstoned
_Emeritus
Posts: 1670
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:12 am

Post by _sunstoned »

William Law - While at Nauvoo, Joseph Smith chose him to be a member of the First Presidency. But being a man of principle, William could not go along with Smith's secret practice of polygamy. Because of this he was excommunicated, and lost his job and standing in the community. I think this took guts.
Post Reply