KimberlyAnn wrote:There is a new feature in the Celestial Kingdom which I feel is antithetical to the purpose of this board. Take notice of the new sticky announcing the creation of "Faith Based" threads. "Faith Based" threads may now be made in the Celestial forum which will not allow for contradictory views. Follows a direct quote culled from the sticky atop this forum page:
If you would like to instigate a Faith Based thread, please indicate that the thread is Faith Based in the thread title.
If you indicate this, then the thread is off limits as far as being challenged or derailed. [bold mine]
Never did I imagine opposing views wouldn't be allowed on this board! We can all agree that it is sometimes frustrating when threads become derailed. And, yes, the Celestial forum should be free of personal attack and vulgarity, but to make challenging views "off-limits"? That effectively quashes discussion! If one wants nothing more than a back-patting session, those can be found on other boards. Like MADB.
I would like to strongly voice my opposition to the new "Faith Based" board rule. It is in direct opposition to the stated purposes of this board.
Kimberly Ann
OK, KA, I'm sorry, but you're creating a straw man here.
I'm not talking about turning the whole Celestial Forum into a back patting section, and I'm not advocating challenging views being off limits.
The only place where the Faith Based rules apply is IF a thread originator places "Faith Based" in the title of a thread in Celestial!
This is NOT, I repeat NOT, a blanket policy for the entire Celestial Forum.
If you don't want a faith based thread, don't create one. If you don't like the idea of participation in a Faith Based thread, then don't participate in one. If someone creates a Faith Based thread and on one participates, guess what happens? It dies on the vine. It moves down the board as other threads are created and dies in its' own right, anyway.
So far, no one has even created a Faith Based thread. This experiment may be a failure before it starts. All we were trying to do was create an option for those who desired it. That's it. This is not some covert plan to change the direction of the board.
Shades, please speak up here if I am stating things out of line.