Serious question: How to prevent temple ordinances on dead?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

The Mormon church allowed her to be abused by our father ............


If its not to personal or painful to ask, could you expound on this?
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_Boaz & Lidia
_Emeritus
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am

Post by _Boaz & Lidia »

Gazelam wrote:
The Mormon church allowed her to be abused by our father ............


If its not to personal or painful to ask, could you expound on this?
She reported it to our mother and our bishop and nothing happened. She was asked if there were things she did to provoke such actions..

Additionally they knew our father was an abusive son-of-a-b**ch. Many ward member witnessed physical abuse from him on us.

I guess it was part of that dont-butt-into-others-business era in Utah...
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

She reported it to our mother and our bishop and nothing happened. She was asked if there were things she did to provoke such actions...


Pretty sick and sad. Sorry to hear it.

Please don't associate what these three did with the church as a whole. Her temple work needs Old Testament be done. These three will be appropriately dealt with.

Im actually kind of suprised you didn't deal with the dad yourself.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_Boaz & Lidia
_Emeritus
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am

Post by _Boaz & Lidia »

Gazelam wrote:
She reported it to our mother and our bishop and nothing happened. She was asked if there were things she did to provoke such actions...


Pretty sick and sad. Sorry to hear it.

Please don't associate what these three did with the church as a whole. Her temple work needs Old Testament be done. These three will be appropriately dealt with.

I'm actually kind of suprised you didn't deal with the dad yourself.
Oh he got his justice, at least some...

Sudden heart attack shortly after retirement at age 65.

He knew we hated him. He took that to the grave, and I can only hope it was his last thoughts...
_antishock8
_Emeritus
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am

Post by _antishock8 »

Daniel Peterson wrote:I would guess that barring baptisms for the dead would have to be part of a broader strategy that would forbid masses for the dead, prayers for the dead, invoking the memory of the dead, and, perhaps, thinking of the dead altogether.


Ew. You're back. Now that the Catholics don't want Mormons to do vicarious work on behalf of the dead, are you going to call them extremists, too? Are you worried Catholics might lose Mormon goodwill? What are Mormons going to do when the inevitable fatwa comes barring Mormons from performing vicarous work on behalf of dead Muslims? Quite a pickle...

Wait. Wait. Please don't bother to answer any of the questions. I'd rather not have to wade through a grievance theater to find the two sentence that actually address the questions.
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.

Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
_antishock8
_Emeritus
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am

Post by _antishock8 »

The Nehor wrote:I'm sorry I show no sympathy for a hateful zealot's crusade to keep someone's name from being mentioned in what he perceives as a mindless sham ceremony. Think of it this way PP. As long as people are doing pointless ordinances in the Temple they're not out converting the world. Should be a win for you.


Listen, the only people being hateful and zealot-y are the Mormons. They're not respecting the wishes of other religions. The Catholics, as directed by the Vatican have asked their people to keep their records from the Mormons so they don't perform vicarious work. This is a directive for a billion plus people. Quite a change now that it ain't some "extremist" Jews asking for similiar respect. Can't you see it's highly offensive to other people at the thought the "crazy Mormons have baptized tio Carlos"?

Shame on you, and shame on the Mormon church for being so insensitive, brutish, and... Zealot-y.
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.

Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
_the road to hana
_Emeritus
Posts: 1485
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by _the road to hana »

antishock8 wrote: What are Mormons going to do when the inevitable fatwa comes barring Mormons from performing vicarous work on behalf of dead Muslims?


Such an incredibly good question.
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
_the road to hana
_Emeritus
Posts: 1485
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by _the road to hana »

Daniel Peterson wrote:I would guess that barring baptisms for the dead would have to be part of a broader strategy that would forbid masses for the dead, prayers for the dead, invoking the memory of the dead, and, perhaps, thinking of the dead altogether.


Sure, this would follow logically, if one also said that barring infant baptism would have to be part of a broader strategy that would forbid blessings on infants, prayers for infants, invoking the memory of infants, and perhaps, thinking of infants altogether.

Unfortunately, however, it's not that simple.

Some things are considered by one religion or another to be an abomination, and even giving the appearance of supporting it can be problematic. As a Latter-day Saint, you should understand that as well as anyone.
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Post by _Mercury »

Call a lawyer for an injunction. All we can do is formally ask them not to. Look at the Holocaust names used over and over again after repeated battles over this.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_neworder
_Emeritus
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 5:38 pm

Post by _neworder »

Why do they even use names?

Instead of a name they should just say "For a person who is dead"

This would be much more efficient. You would get a 1 to 1 Ratio of every temple session to person that is allowed to spirit paradise. Right now many of the same people get their work done for over and over and over again. People get the names messed up, dates wrong, etc and the work does not help anybody else out on the other side. Also think of the many people that have to hang out in spirit prison because nobody knows their name.

I would hate to be the records clerk on the other side. "Sorry Alphonse Diedrick, they didn't get your name quite right so you have to hang out here in spirit prison until they do".

Sorry to hear of your loss Boaz.
Post Reply