Homophobes boycott McDonald's

[_Droopy]

No homosexual can pinpoint the origin or genesis of his or her feelings, nor can the brain sciences or genetics. The origins are obtuse; they are indistinct, obscure, unclear. That was the intent of my usage of the term.

Next time you go off a diving board, make sure its into your own pool; mine is empty at the moment (and learn how to use a thesaurus).

Hmmm... Questionable and certainly not anywhere near being a standard usage. I forget that you, like many other autodidacts, are on a never ending quest to sound sophisticated. Archaizing language and obscure usages are dead giveaways.

The Oxford English Dictionary lists this usage as "obsolete." Next time you go dirt diving in the land of English diction, think again. You only end up looking like the tool you really are.

Nice save Trevor, for a lib who most likely doesn't have a very large or creative vocabulary, which is usually a function of the average leftist's limited intellectual depth. I learned a lot of Latin terms and phrases from reading NR for many years. I like to use those too, but every time I do, I get called either an elitist or a pseudo intellectual trying to sound sophisticated.

When dealing with the average secular leftist/humanist, I'm beginning to think that the best linguistic course to pursue would be to rely almost solely on profanity. I could also use pomobable, which would make me sound very sophisticated. But of course, that meta-language is not intended to convey useful information, but to cement class membership in an abstruse ideological academic niche.

So, now that we know that I've got a larger and more varied vocabulary than you, I'll be sure not to confuse you with any further uses of big words or obtuse usage. Your hebetudinous posts have become rather tiresome.

[_Trevor]

So, now that we know that I've got a larger and more varied vocabulary than you, I'll be sure not to confuse you with any further uses of big words or obtuse usage. Your hebetudinous posts have become rather tiresome.

All you've proven so far is that you're a tool who can thumb through a worn copy of a thesaurus without searching out the word fully to see if the usage is suitable. Anyway, a big vocabulary is only a virtue if you know how to use it. You are working on step one, but you clearly falter on step two. Keep digging, Cogs. Keep digging.

By the way, I learned Latin and Greek by reading them.

Clearly you are too obtuse to realize that it is time for you to hang this one up. I believe that usage is current.

[_Droopy]

All you've proven so far is that you're a tool who can thumb through a worn copy of a thesaurus without searching out the word fully to see if the usage is suitable. Anyway, a big vocabulary is only a virtue if you know how to use it. You are working on step one, but you clearly falter on step two. Keep digging, Cogs. Keep digging.

By the way, I learned Latin and Greek by reading them.

Clearly you are too obtuse to realize that it is time for you to hang this one up. I believe that usage is current.

Keep up the pose Trevor. You're just another brick in the anti-Mormon wall, flat, featureless, and obtuse (dense).

[_Chap]

I learned a lot of Latin terms and phrases from reading NR for many years. I like to use those too, but every time I do, I get called either an elitist or a pseudo intellectual trying to sound sophisticated.

I love it, I love it.

Rem acu tetigisti ... but I don't think you will get the point. Too obtuse.

[_Trevor]

I love it, I love it.

Rem acu tetigisti ... but I don't think you will get the point. Too obtuse.

LOL! Now that is well done.

[_Trevor]

Keep up the pose Trevor. You're just another brick in the anti-Mormon wall, flat, featureless, and obtuse (dense).

Back to the pithy posts, Cogs? A clear sign you lack an adequate retort. Tool.

[_Droopy]

I'm also not impressed by your pose of smarmy intellectual superiority. Its nothing more than what I'd expect from a pious, supercilious liberal too enamored of his own navel to actually do any really deep thinking.

[_Trevor]

I'm also not impressed by your pose of smarmy intellectual superiority. Its nothing more than what I'd expect from a pious, supercilious liberal too enamored of his own navel to actually do any really deep thinking.

Yawn. Come on, Cogs. If you reach for the "liberal" crap, we all know it means you've come up short. Try harder, buddy. We at least want this to seem sporting.

[Guest]

That's it Cogs. Give 'em their merits. Forsooth, eutrapely is impossible with these anti-intellectual, percunctorily, ignorants.

I hope you aren't communicating with us via AT & T based services. They've given in to the gay agenda. If so, hurry up and change that so you can come back and post some more.

[_Trevor]

That's it Cogs. Give 'em their merits. Forsooth, eutrapaly is impossible with these anti-intellectual, percunctorily, ignorants.

ROFLMAO!!!

Please! I haven't had my heart checked recently. I don't know whether I can survive this.