Temple Shock

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Temple Shock

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Pok
Jersey Girl That is how I remember the Jewish traditions too. I won't have time to research any of it until this evening.

Even the miracle story of Jesus changing water to wine had nothing to do with the temple and it seemed like a party, a celebration.

This, to me, throws another wrench in the gears of the church's "Restoration of All Things" mantra.



Okay, it's been far too long that I've thought about the Jewish temple. If I am not mistaken, only priests were permitted IN the Temple (Holy of Holies?) and each time they were annointed (cleansed) and donned special temple clothing that was worn only in the temple.

This would make a great new topic thread. Rites, rituals, temple practice of ancient Judaism?

I'm afraid I don't know enough about that topic to even consider trying to drive a thread like that. I would love to see some knowledgeable posters make comparisions between ancient practices and LDS restored practices.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Temple Shock

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Re: Temple Shock

Post by _Gazelam »

Inconceivable,

Excellent post.

The best way to compare our experience is to that of a parent sendign their child off to college. No more safety and security of the home, just the childs memories of the way things should be and an inner desire to hold fast to the morals and mindset they were brought up with.

Some decide to apply themselves and make use of the time they have in a constructive manner, and some deside to appear in "Spring Break :Girls gone wild".

God gives us the Gift of the Holy Ghost to assist us while we are here, its up to us to follow his promptings. Satan only has as much power over us as we allow him to. We choose to listen to which prompting we will follow.

God only gives warnings of what will happen if we decide to not listen. that's not negative reinforcement, that's no different than someone telling us not to walk through a minefield. Is it negative if we get a leg blown off, and the guy says, "See, I told you but you wouldent listen".

Satan progressed up to a certain point, but is now damned. He has his priesthood authority, and his authority over us extends to no more than a whisper or a prompting. We are our own masters unless we enslave ourselves to his will. We can equally choose to follow the whisperings of the Holy Ghost, which teaches us to stand on our own and master the elements of the body.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_Inconceivable
_Emeritus
Posts: 3405
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:44 am

Re: Temple Shock

Post by _Inconceivable »

Good enough points, Gaz. I pretty much agree with you and you're speaking chapel doctrine. However, the temple speaks in absolutes - your obedience light is either switched on to 100% or it receives it's power from Satan. That is the wording. What an unhealthy reality. We both know it doesn't make sense. English is not that difficult of a language. Should we expect the Mormon God to has a decent command of it? Evidently not.

It's like the former wording of the covenant women made to obey their husbands. My mom lived through a living hell for over 20 years married to an abusive man because he was a Mormon she married in the temple.
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Re: Temple Shock

Post by _Pokatator »

Jersey Girl wrote:Here's a small beginning, Pok:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_in_Jerusalem#Temple_services


Hi Jersey Girl I haven't had a lot of time to research but I did check out this too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_marriage_customs
It seems to me that no marriages were performed in the temple.

The temple rites anciently were performed by the tribe of Levi. That isn't mentioned in the Mormon temple. It is my understanding that Jesus changed the process that was in place, the people had to go through a priest to talk to god. Jesus taught that we no longer needed a priest. He declared he was the last High Priest and the temple was no longer needed.

Jersey Girl I do think a new thread with some one a lot smarter than me would be interesting. I think the list would be long stating the differences between the old temple stuff and the new temple stuff.

This begs the question about the restoration: Restored from what?

It all goes against what Jesus taught. This issue shows me that all this stuff is borrowed and/or made up from man-made stuff not anything to do with god.

Interesting topic but got to go I have a busy day ahead.

Jersey Girl Thanx - Pok
I think it would be morally right to lie about your religion to edit the article favorably.
bcspace
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Jersey Girl wrote:What I see is an element of secrecy involving Temple ceremonies.


What on earth gave you that impression?

There isn't any secrecy involving vicarious baptism, but when it comes to "higher" rite/ceremony, it's alluded to in conversations and teaching however, the ceremony itself isn't clearly indicated.


You don't think so?

I see a progression in LDS teaching that leads one to strong anticipation of what further goes on in the Temple. People anticipate a serious and faith affirming spiritual experience.


You're probably the only one who sees it.

I see a significant level of "let down" and disappointment, even confusion in the accounts of some LDS regarding the Temple.


How do you see that?

It seems to me, that there is a never ending chain of confirmation and encouragement to conform.


I have no idea where you'd get that impression.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Yoda

Re: Temple Shock

Post by _Yoda »

LOL

You were obviously in a cynical mood this morning, Shades. ;)

I agree with your cynicism, by the way.
_Ray A

Re: Temple Shock

Post by _Ray A »

The last time I went to the temple was about two years ago. To pick up mail (when I worked for the Post). It's a beautiful place with very nice people, most wearing white shirts. My first temple experience was great, and the custard and cake desert in the New Zealand temple cafeteria was simply unbeatable. Nothing bad to report. (Except that the transport to and from Hamilton was atrocious.)
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re:

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:What I see is an element of secrecy involving Temple ceremonies.


What on earth gave you that impression?

There isn't any secrecy involving vicarious baptism, but when it comes to "higher" rite/ceremony, it's alluded to in conversations and teaching however, the ceremony itself isn't clearly indicated.


You don't think so?

I see a progression in LDS teaching that leads one to strong anticipation of what further goes on in the Temple. People anticipate a serious and faith affirming spiritual experience.


You're probably the only one who sees it.

I see a significant level of "let down" and disappointment, even confusion in the accounts of some LDS regarding the Temple.


How do you see that?

It seems to me, that there is a never ending chain of confirmation and encouragement to conform.


I have no idea where you'd get that impression.


I was being diplomatic you shape shifting snickerer! You need to pick a side and land on it, buddy. Either you appreciate me when I'm nice or appreciate me when I'm strident. You can't have me both ways.

Well maybe you can...

:-D
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Temple Shock

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Pok
Hi Jersey Girl I haven't had a lot of time to research but I did check out this too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_marriage_customs
It seems to me that no marriages were performed in the temple.


I don't think so either, Pok. What I've read discusses traditions/customs and a public cup ceremony. Thanks for the link!

The temple rites anciently were performed by the tribe of Levi.


Do you mean the Levitical Priesthood?

That isn't mentioned in the Mormon temple. It is my understanding that Jesus changed the process that was in place, the people had to go through a priest to talk to god. Jesus taught that we no longer needed a priest. He declared he was the last High Priest and the temple was no longer needed.


Yes I know. That's why some of the LDS Temple stuff doesn't make sense to me.

Jersey Girl I do think a new thread with some one a lot smarter than me would be interesting. I think the list would be long stating the differences between the old temple stuff and the new temple stuff.


I honestly think there isn't anyone on the board qualified to do that any more than you or I. If so, I'm not aware of them.

This begs the question about the restoration: Restored from what?


I've asked about the Restoration a zillion times on this and other LDS boards. I get no clear/matching answers.

It all goes against what Jesus taught. This issue shows me that all this stuff is borrowed and/or made up from man-made stuff not anything to do with god.


I know!

Interesting topic but got to go I have a busy day ahead.

Jersey Girl Thanx - Pok



You bet!
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply