Henry Jacobs wrote:Here are the things I'll be watching.
If FIRM continues to gain market share, diminishing the influence of the FARMS, and by association the brethren, how long can either of them sit silently by?
That's not such a cut-and-dry dilemma, I think. You see, the Brethren are associated with FARMS only by bureaucratic fiat, yet FIRM is teaching and preaching nothing other than what the prophets themselves have taught. How can the brethren put the stamp of disapproval on FIRM without shooting themselves in the foot?
If FARMS tries to destroy Meldrum, would the brethren continue to give their blessing to FARMS while it engages in Mormon on Mormon crime?
That's an excellent question, since FARMS is the brethren's baby, yet FIRM is the one actually taking their teachings seriously.
Will the whole issue of Book of Mormon historicity produce a schism within the membership that would require First Presidency action to repair?
I don't think it's "historicity" so much as it is "geography."
And as a result of this division, how many members will realize that if the Book of Mormon were true, or had a shred of evidence for it, this level of controversy would never exist in the first place?
I don't know about that one. I think they'll ascribe the controversy to the age-old question of science vs. prophets.
harmony wrote:So... this is for real? Not a joke?
Of course. Why wouldn't it be real? Why would it be a joke?
I predict an excommunication at some point in the future. Poor Bro Meldrum is yanking the chain of a very big dog.
Which big dog? FARMS or FAIR? Perhaps, but the brethren themselves? I think not, since FIRM is merely taking their teachings seriously. I don't think they dare excommunicate Brother Meldrum, since it'll set a very, very dangerous precedent: Believing the words of the prophets can get you excommunicated.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley