''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Ray A

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _Ray A »

Seminars have been scheduled around the world to share this information with all those interested. For the first time, church history and Book of Mormon evidences have been combined together into tours beginning in April 2009. DVD's and books are available to answer questions. You may also volunteer to help plan and promote seminars in your area. (Emphasis added)


FARMS is looking like Mother Theresa in comparison to this.
_Ray A

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _Ray A »

Mister Scratch should seriously get on to this:

Specials.
_Ray A

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _Ray A »

Don't forget to check out the "extended pricing":

Extended Pricing


Reserve online or call (888) 573-8687 for the most valued LDS Cruises and Tours.

Cash Discount Price per Person
Tour Tour Accommodations-Double 999.00
Tour Accommodations-Single 1299.00
Booking Fee 35.00

Airfare Roundtrip Lower 48 States Major Airports 350.00
Taxes/Fees 60.00
I will arrange my own airfare No Cost

Cash Discount Price per Person
Other CHECKS & CASH No Fee (Price & Space subject to change until funds arrive & clear) 0.00
CREDIT CARD Convienience fee (Immediate guaranteed confirmation of Space & Rate) 30.00
Optional Group Travel Insurance (premium due at time of deposit)
For more Travel Insurance information click on "Travel Insurance" under FAQ's below. 68.00

Deposit Deposit Required for Reservation $500
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

Seems to me that the "FIRM" acronym is clearly a dig at FARMS, FAIR, and SHIELDS. FARMS may have thrown the first punch, but Mr. Meldrum intends to throw the last.
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _Pokatator »

I have gotten 3 promo emails from Rod Meldrum/LDS Travel in the last two days. Now how did they get my email address? Has anyone else gotten these emails?

PS I have unsubscribed, if I want this stuff I know where to find it.
I think it would be morally right to lie about your religion to edit the article favorably.
bcspace
_Henry Jacobs
_Emeritus
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:38 am

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _Henry Jacobs »

Gadianton wrote:I mean, really, I hope FARMS can see that it will be rather pointless to declare war against FIRM. I honestly believe whether they want to admit it or not, FARMS has learned some hard lesons, and just might handle this without the hatchet.

Whether FARMS continues to play nice or not will be something to watch.

Here are the things I'll be watching.
If FIRM continues to gain market share, diminishing the influence of the FARMS, and by association the brethren, how long can either of them sit silently by?

If FARMS tries to destroy Meldrum, would the brethren continue to give their blessing to FARMS while it engages in Mormon on Mormon crime?

Will the whole issue of Book of Mormon historicity produce a schism within the membership that would require First Presidency action to repair?

And as a result of this division, how many members will realize that if the Book of Mormon were true, or had a shred of evidence for it, this level of controversy would never exist in the first place?
Oh yes, books disturb people. . . Guy Montag.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _harmony »

So... this is for real? Not a joke?

I predict an excommunication at some point in the future. Poor Bro Meldrum is yanking the chain of a very big dog.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Henry Jacobs wrote:Here are the things I'll be watching.
If FIRM continues to gain market share, diminishing the influence of the FARMS, and by association the brethren, how long can either of them sit silently by?

That's not such a cut-and-dry dilemma, I think. You see, the Brethren are associated with FARMS only by bureaucratic fiat, yet FIRM is teaching and preaching nothing other than what the prophets themselves have taught. How can the brethren put the stamp of disapproval on FIRM without shooting themselves in the foot?

If FARMS tries to destroy Meldrum, would the brethren continue to give their blessing to FARMS while it engages in Mormon on Mormon crime?

That's an excellent question, since FARMS is the brethren's baby, yet FIRM is the one actually taking their teachings seriously.

Will the whole issue of Book of Mormon historicity produce a schism within the membership that would require First Presidency action to repair?

I don't think it's "historicity" so much as it is "geography."

And as a result of this division, how many members will realize that if the Book of Mormon were true, or had a shred of evidence for it, this level of controversy would never exist in the first place?

I don't know about that one. I think they'll ascribe the controversy to the age-old question of science vs. prophets.

harmony wrote:So... this is for real? Not a joke?

Of course. Why wouldn't it be real? Why would it be a joke?

I predict an excommunication at some point in the future. Poor Bro Meldrum is yanking the chain of a very big dog.

Which big dog? FARMS or FAIR? Perhaps, but the brethren themselves? I think not, since FIRM is merely taking their teachings seriously. I don't think they dare excommunicate Brother Meldrum, since it'll set a very, very dangerous precedent: Believing the words of the prophets can get you excommunicated.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Tom
_Emeritus
Posts: 1023
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:45 pm

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _Tom »

Add the FIRM Foundation to the list:

Ancient America Foundation (AAF)
Book of Mormon Archaeological Foundation
Book of Mormon Archaeology Forum (BMAF)
Book of Mormon Foundation
Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS)
Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR)
Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism (FIRM Foundation)
Nephi Project
Research Applications in Mormon Archeology & History (RAMAH)
Scholarly & Historical Information Exchange for Latter-Day Saints (SHIELDS)
Zarahemla Research Foundation
“A scholar said he could not read the Book of Mormon, so we shouldn’t be shocked that scholars say the papyri don’t translate and/or relate to the Book of Abraham. Doesn’t change anything. It’s ancient and historical.” ~ Hanna Seariac
_Henry Jacobs
_Emeritus
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:38 am

Re: ''The Foundation for Indigenous Research and Mormonism''

Post by _Henry Jacobs »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Henry Jacobs wrote:Here are the things I'll be watching.
If FIRM continues to gain market share, diminishing the influence of the FARMS, and by association the brethren, how long can either of them sit silently by?

That's not such a cut-and-dry dilemma, I think. You see, the Brethren are associated with FARMS only by bureaucratic fiat, yet FIRM is teaching and preaching nothing other than what the prophets themselves have taught. How can the brethren put the stamp of disapproval on FIRM without shooting themselves in the foot?

Is following the prophet doctrinal? History sort of shows that following the CURRENT prophet is the only thing that's truly doctrinal. In the modern TBM mind, the '78 debanning makes all those past pronouncements about the place of the negro in the plan of salvation, mute now, only personal opinions based in the popular notions of the time. To officially relegate past prophet statements on Book of Mormon geography to the "opinion bin", Pres. Monson would ultimately have to pull a Kimball.

Sidenote: Why didn't Polygamy Porter come here and post about this himself(herself for all I know), rather than serve as informant?
Oh yes, books disturb people. . . Guy Montag.
Post Reply