JohnStuartMill wrote:If a prophet isn't infallible, how can you determine which of his pronouncements come from God, and which don't? And if you can't make this determination, what reason would anyone have to follow the prophet's pronouncements over their own reasoning?
Latter-day Saints have never claimed their prophets to be infallible, and Latter-day Saint prophets have never claimed to be infallible.
Is there, nonetheless, value in what they say? I find enormous value in what they say.
I have to admit that I honestly can't understand the need that some people -- even, ironically, some atheist and agnostic critics of Mormonism -- seem to have for infallible leaders. I've never felt this need, and don't get it at all.
Does believing in prophets allow me to dispense with the need to think, or with all ambiguity? No. (It sometimes seems to me that critics want to condemn people like me both for being unthinking Morgbots and for not being unthinking Morgbots. The urge to condemn seems to be prior to the grounds for the condemnation.)
harmony wrote:I suspect Brigham thought he was speaking as a prophet.
I happily grant your suspicion every bit of the evidentiary weight it deserves.