asbestosman wrote:First you need to get me to criticize the brethren.
I'll only recommend it when they deserve it. Right now, I would say Elders Holland and Oaks are crying out for it.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
I'm confused, Merc. Where are you quoting this comment from Paul?
His decision to leave the Church is not a hoax
Liz,
It stems from a comment I made about the Book of Abraham being a hoax from the point of view that it's not a genuine translation from Egyptian papyrus but a production put on by Joseph Smith.
For example: The interpretations/translations contained in Facsimile No. 3 are a hoax from the standpoint of the Egyptian artist who made the original. If the original author of Facsimile No. 3 could step forward today he would tell us that Joseph Smith didn't know what he was talking about but has greatly misrepresented his work. The Egyptian would have every right to sue the prophet for Egyptian copyright infringement.
why me wrote:Oliver, David and other witnesses on their deathbed all reaffirmed their testimony of the Book of Mormon. And that means a great deal.
Yes, perhaps, but we cannot know what it means. We can speculate. One thing it cannot be taken to mean is that the Book of Mormon is true. From thousands of years of observing human behavior will millions upon millions upon millions of data points, one thing we've learned is that humans say and do any number of things for any number of reasons. It is simply foolish to take any one thing in isolation and draw definitive conclusions. It must be understood within the broader context. (Which is another reason why DCPs naïve faith in the meaning of the Witnesses and Hollands recent talks are so wrong headed, and so obviously wrong headed).
Deathbed affirmations of the Book of Mormon must be considered with all the other evidence, the mounds and mounds of it, pointing to the Book of Mormon as a 19th century man-made creation. Any suggestion that a deathbed affirmation Trump's all of this is, well, stupid.
Morrissey wrote: Deathbed affirmations of the Book of Mormon must be considered with all the other evidence, the mounds and mounds of it, pointing to the Book of Mormon as a 19th century man-made creation. Any suggestion that a deathbed affirmation Trump's all of this is, well, stupid.
If we were dealing with one deathbed affirmation, I would agree. But in this case we are not. We have quite a few deathbed affirmations. I don't think that these men would risk damnation by lying on their deathbed. Too much at stake. And there would be no reason to give an affirmation to begin with. Why bother at all?
Their affirmations are a huge plus and make the Mormon case very strong.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
Morrissey wrote: Deathbed affirmations of the Book of Mormon must be considered with all the other evidence, the mounds and mounds of it, pointing to the Book of Mormon as a 19th century man-made creation. Any suggestion that a deathbed affirmation Trump's all of this is, well, stupid.
If we were dealing with one deathbed affirmation, I would agree. But in this case we are not. We have quite a few deathbed affirmations. I don't think that these men would risk damnation by lying on their deathbed. Too much at stake. And there would be no reason to give an affirmation to begin with. Why bother at all?
Their affirmations are a huge plus and make the Mormon case very strong.
How many were tape recorded or verified by hostile witnesses?
Also, how many witnesses are we talking about with deathbed affirmations? Didn't think it was many. Whitmer wrote of witnessing Cowdery's - do you believe everything he was writing at the time?
Last edited by Guest on Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"One of the surest ways to avoid even getting near false doctrine is to choose to be simple in our teaching." - Elder Henry B. Eyring, Ensign, May 1999, 74