Will Schryver's Benefactor

[_Doctor Scratch]

What? when did Scratch consider an apologist a friend? I wouldn't have thunk it myself. Is this just a figure of speech or something?

It's pretty much the same as you saying, "Love ya tons."

[_Kevin Graham]

Funny to whom wade? Your own scholars have contacted me out of the blue to help them research for their publications. I've done more research for FAIR than you two numb nuts put together.

So to say I know how to do proper research is "funny" to whom? To you? If so, then I'll take that as a compliment any day of the week.

Your problem with me has always been the fact that I actually do know how to research a subject and make compelling arguments. How many times do I have to show that Will misuses his sources before you actually get it? There is a reason why Will refuses to debate me. It is because he can't.

[_stemelbow]

It's pretty much the same as you saying, "Love ya tons."

It very well could be. Joseph Smith had once said the grand fundamental principle of Mormonism is friendship, which he seemed to define as brotherly love. I can only hope you are genuine here. It would be quite a step forward in mankind's progression toward unity and love, I'd say.

[_wenglund]

Hey, if you want to laugh at your own ineptitude, have at it, my friend.

Hey...no need. You alone, buddy, provide me with more than enough material, more than I can handle. Like Will said, you are second only to Kevin Graham when it comes to self-delusion--one of the more serious forms of ineptitude.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_stemelbow]

Funny to whom wade? Your own scholars have contacted me out of the blue to help them research for their publications. I've done more research for FAIR than you two numb nuts put together.

So to say I know how to do proper research is "funny" to whom? To you? If so, then I'll take that as a compliment any day of the week.

Your problem with me has always been the fact that I actually do know how to research a subject and make compelling arguments. How many times do I have to show that Will misuses his sources before you actually get it? There is a reason why Will refuses to debate me. It is because he can't.

Considering the extreme dislike for anything FAIR common among these posters, I don't think you're doing yourself any favors boasting about this. Its weird to me that so much from FAIR is discounted by posters here before even considering what is said. I think your boast, if true, is impressive, though. So you're safe with me.

[_Will Schryver]

There is a reason why Will refuses to debate me. It is because he can't.

No, it's simply because I have pity on any disabled person who brings a knife to a gunfight:

[_Kishkumen]

Sorry I brought it up. Pouring salt in someone else's festering sore is poor form. Chalk it up to the environment here.

Hey, no problem. Since I haven't the foggiest clue what your fevered imagination has cooked up w/r/t my personal life, I wasn't offended. I am curious about your creative thoughts on my problems at home, so do PM them to me. At the very least they should prove entertaining!

[_Kishkumen]

[If by "transcribe" you mean cut-n-paste from a Word document on my own computer, I have done both. I appreciate the interest.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

I was just curious because you have such a detailed list. That is quite an effort you've made. Good for you.

[_Kishkumen]

No, it's simply because I have pity on any disabled person who brings a knife to a gunfight:

And here I thought I was being treated to a photographic example of the Schryver gene pool.

[_Will Schryver]

I think your boast, if true, is impressive, though.

It's not.

Just like his boast that he gets calls out of the blue to do research for BYU professors ... or whatever.

In fact, if one were to go to the trouble of carefully parsing one of Cracker Graham's mind-numbingly endless rants ... er, posts, it could be demonstrated that somewhere in the neighborhood of 90% of the material is patently untrue, 7% is an exaggeration or misrepresentation of something with a basis in truth, and the remainder is a mixture of twisted grammar, misspellings, and incoherence that defies comprehension.

Other than that, he's one of the most proper researchers in the GSTP.