Will Schryver's Benefactor

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply

Who is Schryver's Likely Benefactor?

 
Total votes: 0

_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _Will Schryver »

Kishkumen wrote:
Will Schryver wrote:I therefore acknowledge what is one of Graham’s rare moments of inadvertent incisiveness—although, in the process, he (ironically enough) merely serves to mimic the role of the blind scholars who had access to a considerable body of data, but could not seem to interpret it correctly, often leaving it for men “uncorrupted by higher education” to come along and open everyone’s eyes to the simple truths of the matter.


Image

A typical reaction of the "blind scholars" to a particularly piercing observation that tends to set their prejudice on its head: affect condescending disinterest.

Classic stuff, that.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _Kishkumen »

Will Schryver wrote:A typical reaction of the "blind scholars" to a particularly piercing observation that tends to set their prejudice on its head: affect condescending disinterest.

Classic stuff, that.


A little sensitive, Will? I had no idea that I had to be so careful with your tender feelings in expressing my impatience that you get on with producing this scholarship you constantly refer to.

Just relax. Any expression of disinterest regarded your continual empty commentary, not your eventual publications.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _Will Schryver »

Kishkumen wrote:
Will Schryver wrote:A typical reaction of the "blind scholars" to a particularly piercing observation that tends to set their prejudice on its head: affect condescending disinterest.

Classic stuff, that.


A little sensitive, Will? I had no idea that I had to be so careful with your tender feelings in expressing my impatience that you get on with producing this scholarship you constantly refer to.

Just relax. Any expression of disinterest regarded your continual empty commentary, not your eventual publications.

Non sequitur.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _harmony »

Will Schryver wrote:Non sequitur.


When can we expect publication of your book, Will?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _Kishkumen »

Will Schryver wrote:Non sequitur.


Pretty stupid response, Will. It is obvious that I know better what I meant by the twiddling thumbs than you. I said it was about my impatience to see you publish. Argument over.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _Will Schryver »

harmony wrote:
Will Schryver wrote:Non sequitur.


When can we expect publication of your book, Will?

I believe I adequately responded to that question quite recently:

People have waited a quarter century for Metcalfe, who has long promised but never delivered even a single line of KEP analysis. People waited 6 years while Brian Hauglid prepared his mildly annotated transcription of the Abraham manuscripts. I have been in possession of the high-res scans of the documents for a little over one year now. I’m inclined to think it reasonable for me to take at least a year or two to more formally articulate what already constitutes the single largest body of substantive analysis of the Kirtland Egyptian Papers put forth in the almost half century since they and the Joseph Smith Papyri burst into the public consciousness (an admittedly dubious distinction, perhaps, considering the virtual vacuum of analysis that preceded my FAIR conference presentation).

But then, my standards are not your standards; my ways not your ways.

(Link here.)
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _Kishkumen »

Will Schryver wrote:I believe I adequately responded to that question quite recently:


I don't see a publication date there, Will.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _Will Schryver »

Kishkumen wrote:
Will Schryver wrote:I believe I adequately responded to that question quite recently:


I don't see a publication date there, Will.

Of course, as with all academic publishing (as Kishkumen well knows), until the printing presses really start to run, there is truly no such thing as a “set in stone” publication date. Even then, things are sometimes subject to change (case in point, the infamous once-aborted issue of the FARMS Review that contained Bill Hamblin’s “Metcalfe is Butthead” acrostic).

In any case, to the best of my knowledge, the following represents the schedule for my soon-forthcoming articles.

  • The Interminable Roll – Determining the Original Length of the Scroll of Hor, Journal of the Book of Mormon and Other Restoration Scripture, Volume 20, Issue 1, approximately June 2011.
    `
  • The Meaning and Purpose of the Kirtland Egyptian Papers – Part 1, Journal of the Book of Mormon and Other Restoration Scripture, Volume 20, Issue 2, approximately December 2011.

    (The KEP paper will be Part 1 of 4 such articles that will be serialized in successive issues of the JBMORS, and then eventually compiled into a single published volume.)

In addition, I have now commenced and will shortly submit (most likely to The Journal of Mormon History) a paper tentatively entitled Robert Taylor Burton and the Morrisite War, a detailed study of the largely ignored contemporary eyewitness testimony that overwhelmingly exonerates Colonel Burton of the false allegations of murder leveled against him in consequence of his actions during the June 1862 Morrisite “war” at Kingston Fort in South Weber, Davis County, Utah.

In the meantime, I have decided it would be valuable for me to make available, in downloadable text format, the script to my 2010 FAIR Conference presentation. It is available at the following link: The Meaning and Purpose of the Kirtland Egyptian Papers



Edited to update link.
Last edited by Guest on Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _harmony »

With all the hoopla, I was expecting a book at the very least.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Will Schryver's Benefactor

Post by _Kishkumen »

Will Schryver wrote:Of course, as with all academic publishing (as Kishkumen well knows), until the printing presses really start to run, there is truly no such thing as a “set in stone” publication date. Even then, things are sometimes subject to change (case in point, the infamous once-aborted issue of the FARMS Review that contained Bill Hamblin’s “Metcalfe is Butthead” acrostic).

In any case, to the best of my knowledge, the following represents the schedule for my soon-forthcoming articles.


Yeah, that is pretty much what we were looking for. Thanks.

By the way, I don't think anyone was expecting a "set in stone" date. We were just tired of reading your vague announcements of hazily described, forthcoming work without any clue about the timeline, etc. I do love how you have a need to create the appearance that a simple request like that was somehow unreasonable--this time by making it out to be something it actually wasn't.

Oh, and, generally my experience is that I have a pretty solid sense of when my work is coming out long before it does.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Post Reply