Droopy, I am not an ex-Mormon or a secular liberal, but i do have an interest in psychology and I really get irritated when the term "addiction" is thrown around to label a moral issue with no regards for what addiction really is. You say you were once an alcoholic, right? Well, were you an alcoholic because you had a 1 beer once in a while? No. Is someone a porn addict if they view it once in a while? No.
1. I was an alcoholic because I developed a pathological relationship with alcohol that weakened, or crippled by ability to use my agency in an appropriate manner. It became difficult to choose not to drink.
2. I became an alcoholic after my first six pack, and the perceptual effects that it produced. The addictive relationship was forged very, very quickly, in my case.
3. It takes very little pornography to generate an addictive relationship with it. Some can actually use cocaine without becoming addicted, or at least dysfunctionally addicted, and pornography presents us with the same dynamic.
Addiction is a pathological, deeply reinforcing relationship with something, whether a substance, activity, or set of feelings and perceptions, generated in whatever manner. Addiction, therefore, resides in both the object of the addiction and within the person addicted.
Pornography is among the most addictive of perceptual stimuli, and cruelly so.