Should MCB become a moderator?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

Do you trust MCB with your posts should she be made a moderator?

 
Total votes: 0

_madeleine
_Emeritus
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 am

Re: Should MCB become a moderator?

Post by _madeleine »

marg wrote:
There are lot of things that go over with Catholics not appropriate so don't be so smug.


I am well aware. lol. I was not comparing in a manner that meant to say Catholics are better. Only comparing.

Edit to add: I was raised LDS, spent most of my life as an atheist, and have now been Catholic for a little over 3 years. Perhaps the comparison I made put LDS culture in a negative light, which was not my intent. While people here lament the odd things that can and do happen in a bishop's interview, there are endearing things about this sort of openness that do not exist in Catholicism, and that I actually miss. Catholics can come across as stand-offish and unfriendly, which, isn't really the case, they're just not crossing boundaries. Also, Catholics tend to stand back and let the Holy Spirit work in people's lives, quietly noting to themselves what they see, and they might tell you if you ask, but they aren't going to comment unless you bring it up.

So in a sense, I see the personal boundaries in Catholicism as a bit on the thick side.

*shrug* But, it is what it is. :) All kinds of people and cultures in this world. God loves variety!

Peace.
Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction -Pope Benedict XVI
_marg
_Emeritus
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:58 am

Re: Should MCB become a moderator?

Post by _marg »

MCB wrote:
Well I’m not catholic, nor Mormon and I think it’s rude to post a jab ..and use a term as a slur against a group of people and not explain oneself.


Perhaps "mormonish" is not appropriate. One can see a parallel with the word "Jewish" and the negative stereotypes. Which is not my intent. And it certainly encompasses a broad range of concepts.

Perhaps we already have it. How about TBM-ish? There. I went through and changed the word wherever I could. Is that a good enough apology?

See-- I respond well to criticism. I can change.


So let me see...""Marg,
I don't know how to say this in an appropriate way for the celestial. However, your behavior is somewhat (Mormonish)/ TBMish. You have a pattern of disagreeing and arguing with everyone."

Nah it doesn't work for me ..why are you dragging in Mormons in trying to be critical of me? In what way am I TBMish?

The argument in that thread started when you accused Dan V. of being a closet Mormon. I rephrased it. He has some TBM-ish characterististics, as a result of his cultural heritage. This is in terms of his adherence to the Joseph-only theory, and refusal to look at contrary evidence.


That was something I said to Dan..and it was based upon his arguments closely paralleling that of a Mormon apologist when it came to how he critically evaluates all the witnesses involved..that is his siding favorably with evidence supportive of Smith's claims (though he rejects the supernatural) and against and much more critical with a different standard applied to evidence not. It was not meant as hostile remark or slur against Mormons. I gave my reasoning. It was identifying where he stands, with my speculation that he may be a Mormon as opposed to an atheist and skeptic. I speculated on that and I believe at the time I gave my reasoning based mainly upon his comment that he believed Cowdery tried to use and read from a seer stone..which I found hard to believe a skeptic would actually think. That along with his treatment of witnesses especially being non skeptical of the Book of Mormon witness claims, led me to that speculation.

But I don't know what you mean by "The argument in that thread started when you accused Dan V. of being a closet Mormon." No argument started in that thread for that reason. That was one comment within pages and pages of discussion that had been going on long before that comment.

And that has nothing to do with you saying "However, your behavior is somewhat (Mormonish)/ TBMish." and not explaining when I asked.


I wass a closet Native for years. That is because I was rejecting the Native stereotypes of laziness, welfare dependency, substance abuse, promiscuity, non-verbal, tending towards violence, minimally literate, etc. People would force those expectations on me, and I fought them. The only way I could reject them was by denying my racial and cultural heritage.

I think part of this was the dynamics behind the breakup of my marriage. Early on, he expressed confusion at my desire to live close to the earth, and my moderately liberal political tendencies. There seemed to be some cog-dis in his confusion.

It was only when I came to know some tribal people who did not fulfill those stereotypes that I began coming out of the closet. And only by moving to Wisconsin did I really begin to feel comfortable in my own tannable skin and strong cheekbones.

So I understand where you are coming from.


To me this seems to be a complete tangent, I don't know where you going with this or why. I don't know what it is you say you are understanding with respect to where I'm coming from. It comes across to me as you having emotional issues unresolved and then you apply those issues to your discussion with people on message boards and make assumptions unwarranted. That's why I ask, why use Mormons as a collective group negatively when you are trying to be critical of me? That raised a red flag for me. If you can use "mormonish" as a slur against me, you can use it as a slur against anyone for just about any reason. At which point your use of the word reflects on you and your attitude..as you are not communicating a legitimate cultural trait what you are communicating is an attitude that you are extremely negative against Mormons collectively.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Should MCB become a moderator?

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Hello,

I voted "No." because I should be a Moderator. Thank you.

V/R
Dr. C
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_MCB
_Emeritus
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Should MCB become a moderator?

Post by _MCB »

Marg-- You have the right to believe what you believe. Just don't try to impose your beliefs on me.

Dr Cam-- I am liking you more and more.
Huckelberry said:
I see the order and harmony to be the very image of God which smiles upon us each morning as we awake.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... cc_toc.htm
_marg
_Emeritus
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:58 am

Re: Should MCB become a moderator?

Post by _marg »

MCB wrote:Marg-- You have the right to believe what you believe. Just don't try to impose your beliefs on me.




Back to your passive aggressiveness again huh? Sorry but I've got to say something then. Look MCB, you are the one trying to impose your beliefs onto me. You were the one who didn't like my discussion with Dan. You think his reasoning is a function of subconscious cultural influence which is not my belief. However MCB, you are welcome to your belief,but I don't share it. I'm not posting jabs at you when you are in discussion with others, nor pulling in irrelevant excuses or using Mormons or your Catholicism as a slur against you. Even in this thread you are the one suggesting I need to change..as you write: “This tells me something about your own personality characteristics, which you can change”
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Should MCB become a moderator?

Post by _Dr. Shades »

MCB:

I thank you for your offer to help moderate--it's a thankless job, so I know your offer was altruistic--but in my heart of hearts I'm afraid that a full third of the votes being cast "No" means that not enough of the community has confidence in your moderatorial abilities, such that they would be.

This poll will now be de-stickied.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply