RockSlider wrote:Well holly crap, looking like I'm not only naïve, but not the sharpest pencil in the holder. "Brick on the Middle tv show" [whispering to self] not the sharpest pencil in the holder.
I think many apologists would be happy to tell you that one ought not to be held accountable for every pseudonym adopted by the anonymous cowards who have criticized apologetics.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
stemelbow wrote:Stop going after Liz. It makes no sense at all. Redirect your hostility, turn it into something positive for a change. That's my advice.
I nominate stem for the position of Moral Voice of MDB. Simon aspired to the position, but his clear moral deficiencies undermined his claim, and stem is clearly both perspicacious and credible in that regard.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
stemelbow wrote:Stop going after Liz. It makes no sense at all. Redirect your hostility, turn it into something positive for a change. That's my advice.
I nominate stem for the position of Moral Voice of MDB. Simon aspired to the position, but his clear moral deficiencies undermined his claim, and stem is clearly both perspicacious and credible in that regard.
I am most definitely (having looked it up in the dictionary) perspicacious, but sadly, I am not Trevor, (if I were I would need not look up perspicacious) yet gladly, neither am I stemelbow.
I would be Trevor if only I could be Trevor. I cannot be Trevor.
Kishkumen wrote:I nominate stem for the position of Moral Voice of MDB. Simon aspired to the position, but his clear moral deficiencies undermined his claim, and stem is clearly both perspicacious and credible in that regard.
Some Schmo wrote:Have you ever thought about leading by example?
No, probably not.
Sure I have schmoe. Example comes off as too subtle around these parts being an LDS poster and all. But I'll take that advice into consideration. It sounds good. Now I just wish you would take some advice for once. ah well...you guys...
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
Nightlion wrote:I would be Trevor if only I could be Trevor. I cannot be Trevor.
A good bit of stuff going there lol.
In your case, I think it is fair to say that the Nightlion identity is so genuine as to preclude the very possibility of being Trevor, even in a metaphorical sense, and so we applaud you for your consistency here. Obviously the appearance of upright character is fully backed up by the substance within you, so you have in yourself disproven the apologetic position on pseudonyms and cowardice. Unsolicited kudos to you, sir.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Nightlion wrote:yet gladly, neither am I stemelbow.
The undeniable ring of truth in that statement may be the best evidence I've heard in years that supports the notion that a god exists (and you heard it through the prophet Nightlion).
Last edited by Guest on Thu Nov 10, 2011 5:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Some Schmo wrote:Have you ever thought about leading by example?
No, probably not.
Sure I have schmoe. Example comes off as too subtle around these parts being an LDS poster and all. But I'll take that advice into consideration. It sounds good. Now I just wish you would take some advice for once. ah well...you guys...
What a short memory you have. I did take your advice... on this very page, in fact.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.