DrW wrote:Before these guys undertake the task of correcting the writing of others, perhaps they should hire a good copy editor for themselves.
From the DN article: "If somebody writes something — whether a journalist or even a politician — that is egregiously bad, we will correct them,"
Definition of egregious ->conspicuously bad
Well, I know that 'egregious' (from Latin, 'out of the flock' = 'standing out from the crowd') nowadays refers to being conspicuous in a bad way (not its original sense), but I don't think it contains 'bad' in it to an extent that would make 'egregiously bad' a straightforward pleonasm. But I agree that a sensitive soul concerned to avoid the merest suspicion of illiteracy on the part of the more pedantic might prefer to avoid such an expression. Personally, I might tough it out.
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.