Kishkumen wrote:Blixa wrote:More funny than the construction "You're all's?"
If you can't laugh at the madness, then what is left?
I'm having a hard time with Fanny from the British point of view.
Kishkumen wrote:Blixa wrote:More funny than the construction "You're all's?"
If you can't laugh at the madness, then what is left?
Melchett wrote:
I'm having a hard time with Fanny from the British point of view.
Blixa wrote:Melchett wrote:
I'm having a hard time with Fanny from the British point of view.
Just don't try knocking me up before 6 in the morning...
Melchett wrote:I'm having a hard time with Fanny from the British point of view.
ldsfaqs wrote:
There is some historical evidence that Joseph Smith knew as early as 1831 that plural marriage would be restored, so it is perfectly legitimate to argue that Joseph's relationship with Fanny Alger was such a case.
ldsfaqs wrote:All that we do have is third hand accounts, most of them recorded many years after the events.[/b]
.................
Ann Eliza also reported that Fanny's family was very proud of Fanny's relationship with Joseph, which makes little sense if it was simply a tawdry affair. Those closest to them saw the marriage as exactly that—a marriage.