Jewish Proxy Baptism combined thread

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Jewish Proxy Baptism combined thread

Post by _just me »

Hasa Diga Eebowai wrote:Everyone seems to be making a huge deal out of Baptisms for the dead, but what about Endowments and Sealings for the Dead??

For example:

a great many distinguished women in history, including several Catholic saints, were also sealed to Joseph Smith in Utah. I saw these astonishing lists in the Latter-day Saint Genealogical Archives in Salt Lake City in 1944.”

- No Man Knows My History, by Fawn Brodie, Preface to Second Edition


Isn't it just as offensive to the Catholic church or any other religious group for that matter to do these things in their name after they are dead? Isn't the practice just really offensive?

Thanks,

Hasa Diga Eebowai


I think I find sealing dead single people to dead dudes a lot more offensive than BFD, but that is just me. Jesus is hitched to Mary and Mary and Martha.

Image
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Jewish Proxy Baptism combined thread

Post by _Drifting »

Am I correct in thinking that the Church has officially apologised for this type of thing and made a commitment to preventing it happening several times now?

1995
2006
2010
2012


At what point is it safe to assume the Church can't or won't prevent it happening again?
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_Tator
_Emeritus
Posts: 3088
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:15 am

Re: Jewish Proxy Baptism combined thread

Post by _Tator »

Drifting wrote:Am I correct in thinking that the Church has officially apologised for this type of thing and made a commitment to preventing it happening several times now?

1995
2006
2010
2012


At what point is it safe to assume the Church can't or won't prevent it happening again?



Ahem, multiple choice question, I pick 1994.
a.k.a. Pokatator joined Oct 26, 2006 and permanently banned from MAD Nov 6, 2006
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: Jewish Proxy Baptism combined thread

Post by _zeezrom »

At least God is more respectful than He was back in Old Testament days. It appears He is trying to be more diplomatic about the conversion of people to His religion.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Jewish Proxy Baptism combined thread

Post by _moksha »

•Possible ancestors, meaning individuals who have a probable family relationship that cannot be verified because the records are inadequate, ...


Well, it is good to see an allowance made for early hominids.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply