Family dies holding hands, praying

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Hoops wrote:
It is written hearsay and provides zero evidence to support the assertion that Jesus was resurrected.

It is evidence. It may not be evidence you accept, but it is evidence.



If it is of any consolation to you at all, Hoops. I wasn't in Dealey Plaza the day President Kennedy was shot. The only evidence I had that he was shot and killed were the news reports on television, radio and in newspapers.

I suppose it's possible that lacking television, radio and newspapers, that the disciples could have used the best form of transmission they had on hand, word of mouth, to spread the news that Christ was crucified, died and resurrected.

And then someone wrote it down for us to read.

:-)
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_honorentheos
_Emeritus
Posts: 11104
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:17 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _honorentheos »

Hi Hoops,

Thank you for your reply to my question. I'm still not clear on how Paul could be called an apostle if he failed to walk with Christ prior to the resurrection, but maybe it's not something easily explained?

As to the second point, I guess the problem many atheists have is exactly the one you spell out - that being, "Why would God intervene here, but not the next time?" and you suggest a date for when it stopped along with a cause. But we still haven't clearly explained why God would intervene on the behalf of, say, Daniel in the lions' den without recasting the entirely of the Old Testament into Christian term. I'd suggest that is a move much closer to Mormonism than you might normally tread.

Along those lines, I'm curious on what grounds you could contend that the same phenomena did not apply to the Mormon church? It was a thought that came to me in reading your early church father quotes - how similar they sound to a modern day Thomas Monson wondering aloud why miracles may have been manifest in the days of Joseph Smith that are not today. Could it be that these miracles were manifest to establish the authority of LDS scripture? If not, on what grounds do you dismiss this possibility? How do your quotes not establish LDS claims that the authority and power were lost to the Christian church and your explanations are just rationalizations for this loss of power? There are, for example, modern LDS claims of miracles at a scale comparable to the moving of a tornado such as the mission president's wife who dreamed of an earth quake in I think Peru or perhaps Chile and saw this as a warning from God. It was touted on the boards as evidence for divine revelation when an earthquake actually happened and the LDS missionaries were both protected and prepared both for themselves and to help others. Why is this not a valid example of modern forms of miracles that suggest they have not ceased?
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth?
~ Eiji Yoshikawa
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Hoops »

Fair questions.

[ I'm still not clear on how Paul could be called an apostle if he failed to walk with Christ prior to the resurrection, but maybe it's not something easily explained?

According to Paul, he fulfills the 3 essential elements of an apostle. 1) He was appointed by the original 12 (minus Judas, of course), he was taught directly by Jesus - you'll remember the 3 years he spent in isolation before beginning his ministry, 3) he witnessed the resurrected Christ. Now, whether or not one should believe his claims is another matter. But these are the reasons why he is an apostle. Note, also, that he was not a prophet, but an apostle.

As to the second point, I guess the problem many atheists have is exactly the one you spell out - that being, "Why would God intervene here, but not the next time?"
I would phrase it as, "Why SHOULD God intervene..."

and you suggest a date for when it stopped along with a cause.
A decidedly maleable date. I'm open to much earlier, but not terribly open to any time later.

But we still haven't clearly explained why God would intervene on the behalf of, say, Daniel in the lions' den without recasting the entirely of the Old Testament into Christian term.
The kinds of miracles we're talking about are exclusively miracles that are supernatural. Stopping time. Rising from the dead, things like that. And all of these manifestations of God's power occur at a time when there needed to be a dramatic shift in events to accomplish some goal. In the Old Testament, it would be to preserve Israel from some form of destruction - often internally, I'll grant.

I'd suggest that is a move much closer to Mormonism than you might normally tread.
Mormonism could have easily been a quirky subset of MCism. It chose otherwise. Another argument. But the problem with Mormonism is it's insistence on additional scripture, scripture not produced by the apostles (again, there is a reason why they are apostels and we are not), and its insistence that there have been additional prophets. The last prophet is still alive, therefor, no need of another.

Along those lines, I'm curious on what grounds you could contend that the same phenomena did not apply to the Mormon church?
Because the foundation of the church had already been laid - the efficacy of that foundation being the purpose of the miracles.

It was a thought that came to me in reading your early church father quotes - how similar they sound to a modern day Thomas Monson wondering aloud why miracles may have been manifest in the days of Joseph Smith that are not today.
That's a fair point, if one considers that Joseph Smith miracles have a purpose other than to lay an entirely new foundation. Which is, of course, its claim. I just don't see that a new foundations is necessary.

Could it be that these miracles were manifest to establish the authority of LDS scripture?
It could be. For one to accept that, there's a lot of Mormonism that we would have to accept as its companion. Which, it would seem, is another argument.

If not, on what grounds do you dismiss this possibility?
The foundation of the church had been established for some time now.

How do your quotes not establish LDS claims that the authority and power were lost to the Christian church and your explanations are just rationalizations for this loss of power?
you're asking, here, about the nature and purpose of miracles. If one were to accept that Mormonism miracles had the same function as early Christian miracles then what reason would we have to jettison the first ones? And if we don't, then what reason is there to accept Mormonism miracles? We'll disregard, for a moment, the nature of the competing miracles.

There are, for example, modern LDS claims of miracles at a scale comparable to the moving of a tornado such as the mission president's wife who dreamed of an earth quake in I think Peru or perhaps Chile and saw this as a warning from God. It was touted on the boards as evidence for divine revelation when an earthquake actually happened and the LDS missionaries were both protected and prepared both for themselves and to help others. Why is this not a valid example of modern forms of miracles that suggest they have not ceased?
It could be. But why would they continue? That's seems like a better question. But, to answer yours, I have doubts of that miracle as well as any other miracles claimed by anyone. I'm NOT saying they don't occur, God can choose when and where to intervene. I'm just suspicious.

Given that, let's remember, when one reads the Bible as literal (which is what I would suggest) that it might seem like miracles occurred everyday. I don't think that's a fair reading. The passage that Mormons like to point to - something about "...there's so much more I could write that would fill volumes" -- Luke? -- is an indication of the miracles that Jesus and the apostles performed. Even with that, I don't think it's fair to read that the apostles performed miracles routinely. They were reserved as a demonstration of there authority. So, given that, if the apostle had the authority the claimed, then why would Joseph Smith have more authority? And, one last thing, Joseph Smith was not a jew.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Hi Hoops

I have two questions about miracles. It seems to me that the Bible does not indicate that a time of miracles would cease. I could be wrong. But there are many passages, some that were mentioned here on this thread, that the followers of Jesus would do the miracles he did and even greater ones. What is the biblical justification for miracles only occurring to show Jesus was who and what he claimed?

Next, it does seem that all through Christian history there are claims of miracles. Of course there are others, as you pointed out, that claim the Church era had no miracles, direct revelation, etc. If I am incorrect in this let me know. Even now there are many Christian groups that seem to claim miracles and healings and such. In your view are these groups fake or lying about this?
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Chap »

Chap wrote:
Hoops wrote: - the question is why would miracles happen during the establishment of the church and not now. I have offered a reasonable explanation for that. What is the criticism of THAT position?


Let us recall that your date for the cessation of miracles after the establishment of the church was complete was c. AD 350.

The criticism of that position is that it is possible to document a continuous assumption by Christians long after that date that it was not only reasonable to continue to expect miracles, but that they had actually happened and were continuing to happen.

I gave a solidly evidenced argument that people of great intellectual power and sophistication such as Bede of Jarrow and Pope Gregory were taking miracles for granted two or three hundred years after the time when, according to Hoops, they ought to have realized that the miracle tap had been turned off for good. But they just didn't see things that way.

How is it that Hoops can be sure that she is right today and all those earlier Christians were wrong?

Also, would one not expect that if miracles really did happen earlier, but were turned off around AD 350, quite a lot of people would have noticed? I mean, that would have been quite a change. Some Christians (such as Chrysostom and Augustine of Hippo) certainly did remark that there seemed to be no more speaking with tongues - but can Hoops evidence a general agreement that 'the age of miracles is past?' That might be difficult, when one dissenter from that position (Gregory) was the acknowledged leader of Western Christendom at the time he made his belief in miracles explicit in writing to Augustine of Canterbury in AD 601 (see my post).





Hoops wrote:It would appear somebody did notice:



From: http://www.sfpulpit.com/about/



John Chrysostom (c. 344–407):

This whole place [speaking about 1 Corinthians 12] is very obscure: but the obscurity is produced by our ignorance of the facts referred to and by their cessation, being such as then used to occur but now no longer take place. [1]

*****

Augustine (354–430):

In the earliest times, “the Holy Ghost fell upon them that believed: and they spake with tongues,” which they had not learned, “as the Spirit gave them utterance.” These were signs adapted to the time. For there behooved to be that betokening of the Holy Spirit in all tongues, to shew that the Gospel of God was to run through all tongues over the whole earth. That thing was done for a betokening, and it passed away. [2]

*****

Theodoret of Cyrus (c. 393–c. 466):

In former times those who accepted the divine preaching and who were baptized for their salvation were given visible signs of the grace of the Holy Spirit at work in them. Some spoke in tongues which they did not know and which nobody had taught them, while others performed miracles or prophesied. The Corinthians also did these things, but they did not use the gifts as they should have done. They were more interested in showing off than in using them for the edification of the church. . . . Even in our time grace is given to those who are deemed worthy of holy baptism, but it may not take the same form as it did in those days. [3]

*****

<SNIP A series of quotations from the Martin Luther onwards giving their opinion on the question under discussion - not relevant to the question of what evidence supports your point. SNIP>



Now look here, Hoops. I said specifically in my post:

Some Christians (such as Chrysostom and Augustine of Hippo) certainly did remark that there seemed to be no more speaking with tongues - but can Hoops evidence a general agreement that 'the age of miracles is past?'

But the sources you cite are dealing precisely with the issue of the cessation of speaking in tongues. Chrysostom and Theodoret are both commenting on the references of Paul to the gift of tongues in 1 Corinthians. Here for instance is the opening of Chrysostom's Homily XXIX::

1 Corinthians chapter 12, verse 1 and 1 Corinthians chapter 12, verse 2 Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant. Ye know that when ye were Gentiles, ye were led away unto those dumb idols, howsoever ye might be led.

This whole place is very obscure: but the obscurity is produced by our ignorance of the facts referred to and by their cessation, being such as then used to occur but now no longer take place. And why do they not happen now? Why look now, the cause too of the obscurity hath produced us again another question: namely, why did they then happen, and now do so no more?

This however let us defer to another time, but for the present let us state what things were occurring then. Well: what did happen then? Whoever was baptized he straightway spake with tongues and not with tongues only, but many also prophesied, and some also performed many other wonderful works. For since on their coming over from idols, without any clear knowledge or training in the ancient Scriptures, they at once on their baptism received the Spirit, yet the Spirit they saw not, for It is invisible; therefore God's grace bestowed some sensible proof of that energy.

And one straightway spake in the Persian, another in the Roman, another in the Indian, another in some other such tongue:
and this made manifest to them that were without that it is the Spirit in the very person speaking.
Wherefore also he so calls it, saying, "But to each one the manifestation of the Spirit is given to profit withal;" (v. 7.) calling the gifts "a manifestation of the Spirit."

For as the Apostles themselves had received this sign first, so also the faithful went on receiving it, I mean, the gift of tongues; yet not this only but also many others: inasmuch as many used even to raise the dead and to cast out devils and to perform many other such wonders:and they had gifts too, some less, and some more.

But more abundant than all was the gift of tongues among them: and this became to them a cause of division; not from its own nature but from the perverseness of them that had received it:


So this does not go to the point you are trying to prove - which is a general consciousness amongst Christians post AD 350 that miracles in general (not just speaking in tongues) had ceased.

To show how useless your sources are, let me just quote from another bit of the writing of Augustine (Have you, I wonder, ever sat down and read any books by Augustine? It so happens that I have. Try it sometime - they are very interesting, especially his Confessions.) Here is Augustine in chapter 8 of his City of God (scroll down to the chapter), specifically telling us that miracles are continuing in his own day - this is only an extract of a very long chapter listing miracle after miracle:

Chapter 8.— Of Miracles Which Were Wrought that the World Might Believe in Christ, and Which Have Not Ceased Since the World Believed.

Why, they say, are those miracles, which you affirm were wrought formerly, wrought no longer? I might, indeed, reply that miracles were necessary before the world believed, in order that it might believe. And whoever now-a-days demands to see prodigies that he may believe, is himself a great prodigy, because he does not believe, though the whole world does. But they make these objections for the sole purpose of insinuating that even those former miracles were never wrought. How, then, is it that everywhere Christ is celebrated with such firm belief in His resurrection and ascension? How is it that in enlightened times, in which every impossibility is rejected, the world has, without any miracles, believed things marvellously incredible? Or will they say that these things were credible, and therefore were credited? Why then do they themselves not believe? Our argument, therefore, is a summary one— either incredible things which were not witnessed have caused the world to believe other incredible things which both occurred and were witnessed, or this matter was so credible that it needed no miracles in proof of it, and therefore convicts these unbelievers of unpardonable scepticism. This I might say for the sake of refuting these most frivolous objectors. But we cannot deny that many miracles were wrought to confirm that one grand and health-giving miracle of Christ's ascension to heaven with the flesh in which He rose. For these most trustworthy books of ours contain in one narrative both the miracles that were wrought and the creed which they were wrought to confirm. The miracles were published that they might produce faith, and the faith which they produced brought them into greater prominence. For they are read in congregations that they may be believed, and yet they would not be so read unless they were believed. For even now miracles are wrought in the name of Christ, whether by His sacraments or by the prayers or relics of His saints; but they are not so brilliant and conspicuous as to cause them to be published with such glory as accompanied the former miracles. For the canon of the sacred writings, which behooved to be closed, causes those to be everywhere recited, and to sink into the memory of all the congregations; but these modern miracles are scarcely known even to the whole population in the midst of which they are wrought, and at the best are confined to one spot. For frequently they are known only to a very few persons, while all the rest are ignorant of them, especially if the state is a large one; and when they are reported to other persons in other localities, there is no sufficient authority to give them prompt and unwavering credence, although they are reported to the faithful by the faithful.

The miracle which was wrought at Milan when I was there, and by which a blind man was restored to sight, could come to the knowledge of many; for not only is the city a large one, but also the emperor was there at the time, and the occurrence was witnessed by an immense concourse of people that had gathered to the bodies of the martyrs Protasius and Gervasius, which had long lain concealed and unknown, but were now made known to the bishop Ambrose in a dream, and discovered by him. By virtue of these remains the darkness of that blind man was scattered, and he saw the light of day.

But who but a very small number are aware of the cure which was wrought upon Innocentius, ex-advocate of the deputy prefecture, a cure wrought at Carthage, in my presence, and under my own eyes? For when I and my brother Alypius, who were not yet clergymen, though already servants of God, came from abroad, this man received us, and made us live with him, for he and all his household were devotedly pious. He was being treated by medical men for fistulæ, of which he had a large number intricately seated in the rectum. He had already undergone an operation, and the surgeons were using every means at their command for his relief. In that operation he had suffered long-continued and acute pain; yet, among the many folds of the gut, one had escaped the operators so entirely, that, though they ought to have laid it open with the knife, they never touched it. And thus, though all those that had been opened were cured, this one remained as it was, and frustrated all their labor. The patient, having his suspicions awakened by the delay thus occasioned, and fearing greatly a second operation, which another medical man— one of his own domestics— had told him he must undergo, though this man had not even been allowed to witness the first operation, and had been banished from the house, and with difficulty allowed to come back to his enraged master's presence—the patient, I say, broke out to the surgeons, saying, "Are you going to cut me again? Are you, after all, to fulfill the prediction of that man whom you would not allow even to be present?" The surgeons laughed at the unskillful doctor, and soothed their patient's fears with fair words and promises. So several days passed, and yet nothing they tried did him good. Still they persisted in promising that they would cure that fistula by drugs, without the knife. They called in also another old practitioner of great repute in that department, Ammonius (for he was still alive at that time); and he, after examining the part, promised the same result as themselves from their care and skill. On this great authority, the patient became confident, and, as if already well, vented his good spirits in facetious remarks at the expense of his domestic physician, who had predicted a second operation. To make a long story short, after a number of days had thus uselessly elapsed, the surgeons, wearied and confused, had at last to confess that he could only be cured by the knife. Agitated with excessive fear, he was terrified, and grew pale with dread; and when he collected himself and was able to speak, he ordered them to go away and never to return. Worn out with weeping, and driven by necessity, it occurred to him to call in an Alexandrian, who was at that time esteemed a wonderfully skillful operator, that he might perform the operation his rage would not suffer them to do. But when he had come, and examined with a professional eye the traces of their careful work, he acted the part of a good man, and persuaded his patient to allow those same hands the satisfaction of finishing his cure which had begun it with a skill that excited his admiration, adding that there was no doubt his only hope of a cure was by an operation, but that it was thoroughly inconsistent with his nature to win the credit of the cure by doing the little that remained to be done, and rob of their reward men whose consummate skill, care, and diligence he could not but admire when be saw the traces of their work. They were therefore again received to favor; and it was agreed that, in the presence of the Alexandrian, they should operate on the fistula, which, by the consent of all, could now only be cured by the knife. The operation was deferred till the following day. But when they had left, there arose in the house such a wailing, in sympathy with the excessive despondency of the master, that it seemed to us like the mourning at a funeral, and we could scarcely repress it. Holy men were in the habit of visiting him daily; Saturninus of blessed memory, at that time bishop of Uzali, and the presbyter Gelosus, and the deacons of the church of Carthage; and among these was the bishop Aurelius, who alone of them all survives—a man to be named by us with due reverence—and with him I have often spoken of this affair, as we conversed together about the wonderful works of God, and I have found that he distinctly remembers what I am now relating. When these persons visited him that evening according to their custom, he besought them, with pitiable tears, that they would do him the honor of being present next day at what he judged his funeral rather than his suffering. For such was the terror his former pains had produced, that he made no doubt he would die in the hands of the surgeons. They comforted him, and exhorted him to put his trust in God, and nerve his will like a man. Then we went to prayer; but while we, in the usual way, were kneeling and bending to the ground, he cast himself down, as if some one were hurling him violently to the earth, and began to pray; but in what a manner, with what earnestness and emotion, with what a flood of tears, with what groans and sobs, that shook his whole body, and almost prevented him speaking, who can describe! Whether the others prayed, and had not their attention wholly diverted by this conduct, I do not know. For myself, I could not pray at all. This only I briefly said in my heart: "O Lord, what prayers of Your people do You hear if You hear not these?" For it seemed to me that nothing could be added to this prayer, unless he expired in praying. We rose from our knees, and, receiving the blessing of the bishop, departed, the patient beseeching his visitors to be present next morning, they exhorting him to keep up his heart. The dreaded day dawned. The servants of God were present, as they had promised to be; the surgeons arrived; all that the circumstances required was ready; the frightful instruments are produced; all look on in wonder and suspense. While those who have most influence with the patient are cheering his fainting spirit, his limbs are arranged on the couch so as to suit the hand of the operator; the knots of the bandages are untied; the part is bared; the surgeon examines it, and, with knife in hand, eagerly looks for the sinus that is to be cut. He searches for it with his eyes; he feels for it with his finger; he applies every kind of scrutiny: he finds a perfectly firm cicatrix! No words of mine can describe the joy, and praise, and thanksgiving to the merciful and almighty God which was poured from the lips of all, with tears of gladness. Let the scene be imagined rather than described!

In the same city of Carthage lived Innocentia, a very devout woman of the highest rank in the state. She had cancer in one of her breasts, a disease which, as physicians say, is incurable. Ordinarily, therefore, they either amputate, and so separate from the body the member on which the disease has seized, or, that the patient's life may be prolonged a little, though death is inevitable even if somewhat delayed, they abandon all remedies, following, as they say, the advice of Hippocrates. This the lady we speak of had been advised to by a skillful physician, who was intimate with her family; and she betook herself to God alone by prayer. On the approach of Easter, she was instructed in a dream to wait for the first woman that came out from the baptistery after being baptized, and to ask her to make the sign of Christ upon her sore. She did so, and was immediately cured. The physician who had advised her to apply no remedy if she wished to live a little longer, when he had examined her after this, and found that she who, on his former examination, was afflicted with that disease was now perfectly cured, eagerly asked her what remedy she had used, anxious, as we may well believe, to discover the drug which should defeat the decision of Hippocrates. But when she told him what had happened, he is said to have replied, with religious politeness, though with a contemptuous tone, and an expression which made her fear he would utter some blasphemy against Christ, "I thought you would make some great discovery to me." She, shuddering at his indifference, quickly replied, "What great thing was it for Christ to heal a cancer, who raised one who had been four days dead?" When, therefore, I had heard this, I was extremely indignant that so great a miracle wrought in that well-known city, and on a person who was certainly not obscure, should not be divulged, and I considered that she should be spoken to, if not reprimanded on this score. And when she replied to me that she had not kept silence on the subject, I asked the women with whom she was best acquainted whether they had ever heard of this before. They told me they knew nothing of it. "See," I said, "what your not keeping silence amounts to, since not even those who are so familiar with you know of it." And as I had only briefly heard the story, I made her tell how the whole thing happened, from beginning to end, while the other women listened in great astonishment, and glorified God.

A gouty doctor of the same city, when he had given in his name for baptism, and had been prohibited the day before his baptism from being baptized that year, by black woolly-haired boys who appeared to him in his dreams, and whom he understood to be devils, and when, though they trod on his feet, and inflicted the acutest pain he had ever yet experienced, he refused to obey them, but overcame them, and would not defer being washed in the laver of regeneration, was relieved in the very act of baptism, not only of the extraordinary pain he was tortured with, but also of the disease itself, so that, though he lived a long time afterwards, he never suffered from gout; and yet who knows of this miracle? We, however, do know it, and so, too, do the small number of brethren who were in the neighborhood, and to whose ears it might come.

An old comedian of Curubis was cured at baptism not only of paralysis, but also of hernia, and, being delivered from both afflictions, came up out of the font of regeneration as if he had had nothing wrong with his body. Who outside of Curubis knows of this, or who but a very few who might hear it elsewhere? But we, when we heard of it, made the man come to Carthage, by order of the holy bishop Aurelius, although we had already ascertained the fact on the information of persons whose word we could not doubt.

Hesperius, of a tribunitian family, and a neighbor of our own, has a farm called Zubedi in the Fussalian district; and, finding that his family, his cattle, and his servants were suffering from the malice of evil spirits, he asked our presbyters, during my absence, that one of them would go with him and banish the spirits by his prayers. One went, offered there the sacrifice of the body of Christ, praying with all his might that that vexation might cease. It did cease immediately, through God's mercy. Now he had received from a friend of his own some holy earth brought from Jerusalem, where Christ, having been buried, rose again the third day. This earth he had hung up in his bedroom to preserve himself from harm. But when his house was purged of that demoniacal invasion, he began to consider what should be done with the earth; for his reverence for it made him unwilling to have it any longer in his bedroom. It so happened that I and Maximinus bishop of Synita, and then my colleague, were in the neighborhood. Hesperius asked us to visit him, and we did so. When he had related all the circumstances, he begged that the earth might be buried somewhere, and that the spot should be made a place of prayer where Christians might assemble for the worship of God. We made no objection: it was done as he desired. There was in that neighborhood a young countryman who was paralytic, who, when he heard of this, begged his parents to take him without delay to that holy place. When he had been brought there, he prayed, and immediately went away on his own feet perfectly cured.

There is a country-seat called Victoriana, less than thirty miles from Hippo-regius. At it there is a monument to the Milanese martyrs, Protasius and Gervasius. Thither a young man was carried, who, when he was watering his horse one summer day at noon in a pool of a river, had been taken possession of by a devil. As he lay at the monument, near death, or even quite like a dead person, the lady of the manor, with her maids and religious attendants, entered the place for evening prayer and praise, as her custom was, and they began to sing hymns. At this sound the young man, as if electrified, was thoroughly aroused, and with frightful screaming seized the altar, and held it as if he did not dare or were not able to let it go, and as if he were fixed or tied to it; and the devil in him, with loud lamentation, besought that he might be spared, and confessed where and when and how he took possession of the youth. At last, declaring that he would go out of him, he named one by one the parts of his body which he threatened to mutilate as he went out and with these words he departed from the man. But his eye, falling out on his cheek, hung by a slender vein as by a root, and the whole of the pupil which had been black became white. When this was witnessed by those present (others too had now gathered to his cries, and had all joined in prayer for him), although they were delighted that he had recovered his sanity of mind, yet, on the other hand, they were grieved about his eye, and said he should seek medical advice. But his sister's husband, who had brought him there, said, "God, who has banished the devil, is able to restore his eye at the prayers of His saints." Therewith he replaced the eye that was fallen out and hanging, and bound it in its place with his handkerchief as well as he could, and advised him not to loose the bandage for seven days. When he did so, he found it quite healthy. Others also were cured there, but of them it were tedious to speak.

I know that a young woman of Hippo was immediately dispossessed of a devil, on anointing herself with oil, mixed with the tears of the prebsyter who had been praying for her. I know also that a bishop once prayed for a demoniac young man whom he never saw, and that he was cured on the spot.

There was a fellow-townsman of ours at Hippo, Florentius, an old man, religious and poor, who supported himself as a tailor. Having lost his coat, and not having means to buy another, he prayed to the Twenty Martyrs, who have a very celebrated memorial shrine in our town, begging in a distinct voice that he might be clothed. Some scoffing young men, who happened to be present, heard him, and followed him with their sarcasm as he went away, as if he had asked the martyrs for fifty pence to buy a coat. But he, walking on in silence, saw on the shore a great fish, gasping as if just cast up, and having secured it with the good-natured assistance of the youths, he sold it for curing to a cook of the name of Catosus, a good Christian man, telling him how he had come by it, and receiving for it three hundred pence, which he laid out in wool, that his wife might exercise her skill upon, and make into a coat for him. But, on cutting up the fish, the cook found a gold ring in its belly; and immediately, moved with compassion, and influenced, too, by religious fear, gave it up to the man, saying, "See how the Twenty Martyrs have clothed you."

When the bishop Projectus was bringing the relics of the most glorious martyr Stephen to the waters of Tibilis, a great concourse of people came to meet him at the shrine. There a blind woman entreated that she might be led to the bishop who was carrying the relics. He gave her the flowers he was carrying. She took them, applied them to her eyes, and immediately saw. Those who were present were astounded, while she, with every expression of joy, preceded them, pursuing her way without further need of a guide.

Lucillus bishop of Sinita, in the neighborhood of the colonial town of Hippo, was carrying in procession some relics of the same martyr, which had been deposited in the castle of Sinita. A fistula under which he had long labored, and which his private physician was watching an opportunity to cut, was suddenly cured by the mere carrying of that sacred fardel, — at least, afterwards there was no trace of it in his body.

Eucharius, a Spanish priest, residing at Calama, was for a long time a sufferer from stone. By the relics of the same martyr, which the bishop Possidius brought him, he was cured. Afterwards the same priest, sinking under another disease, was lying dead, and already they were binding his hands. By the succor of the same martyr he was raised to life, the priest's cloak having been brought from the oratory and laid upon the corpse.

There was there an old nobleman named Martial, who had a great aversion to the Christian religion, but whose daughter was a Christian, while her husband had been baptized that same year. When he was ill, they besought him with tears and prayers to become a Christian, but he positively refused, and dismissed them from his presence in a storm of indignation. It occurred to the son-in-law to go to the oratory of St. Stephen, and there pray for him with all earnestness that God might give him a right mind, so that he should not delay believing in Christ. This he did with great groaning and tears, and the burning fervor of sincere piety; then, as he left the place, he took some of the flowers that were lying there, and, as it was already night, laid them by his father's head, who so slept. And lo! Before dawn, he cries out for some one to run for the bishop; but he happened at that time to be with me at Hippo. So when he had heard that he was from home, he asked the presbyters to come. They came. To the joy and amazement of all, he declared that he believed, and he was baptized. As long as he remained in life, these words were ever on his lips: "Christ, receive my spirit," though he was not aware that these were the last words of the most blessed Stephen when he was stoned by the Jews. They were his last words also, for not long after he himself also gave up the ghost.

There, too, by the same martyr, two men, one a citizen, the other a stranger, were cured of gout; but while the citizen was absolutely cured, the stranger was only informed what he should apply when the pain returned; and when he followed this advice, the pain was at once relieved.

Audurus is the name of an estate, where there is a church that contains a memorial shrine of the martyr Stephen. It happened that, as a little boy was playing in the court, the oxen drawing a wagon went out of the track and crushed him with the wheel, so that immediately he seemed at his last gasp. His mother snatched him up, and laid him at the shrine, and not only did he revive, but also appeared uninjured.

A religious female, who lived at Caspalium, a neighboring estate, when she was so ill as to be despaired of, had her dress brought to this shrine, but before it was brought back she had gone. However, her parents wrapped her corpse in the dress, and, her breath returning, she became quite well.

At Hippo a Syrian called Bassus was praying at the relics of the same martyr for his daughter, who was dangerously ill. He too had brought her dress with him to the shrine. But as he prayed, behold, his servants ran from the house to tell him she was dead. His friends, however, intercepted them, and forbade them to tell him, lest he should bewail her in public. And when he had returned to his house, which was already ringing with the lamentations of his family, and had thrown on his daughter's body the dress he was carrying, she was restored to life.

There, too, the son of a man, Irenæus, one of our tax-gatherers, took ill and died. And while his body was lying lifeless, and the last rites were being prepared, amidst the weeping and mourning of all, one of the friends who were consoling the father suggested that the body should be anointed with the oil of the same martyr. It was done, and he revived.

Likewise Eleusinus, a man of tribunitian rank among us, laid his infant son, who had died, on the shrine of the martyr, which is in the suburb where he lived, and, after prayer, which he poured out there with many tears, he took up his child alive.

What am I to do? I am so pressed by the promise of finishing this work, that I cannot record all the miracles I know; and doubtless several of our adherents, when they read what I have narrated, will regret that I have omitted so many which they, as well as I, certainly know. Even now I beg these persons to excuse me, and to consider how long it would take me to relate all those miracles, which the necessity of finishing the work I have undertaken forces me to omit. For were I to be silent of all others, and to record exclusively the miracles of healing which were wrought in the district of Calama and of Hippo by means of this martyr— I mean the most glorious Stephen— they would fill many volumes; and yet all even of these could not be collected, but only those of which narratives have been written for public recital. For when I saw, in our own times, frequent signs of the presence of divine powers similar to those which had been given of old, I desired that narratives might be written, judging that the multitude should not remain ignorant of these things. It is not yet two years since these relics were first brought to Hippo-regius, and though many of the miracles which have been wrought by it have not, as I have the most certain means of knowing, been recorded, those which have been published amount to almost seventy at the hour at which I write. But at Calama, where these relics have been for a longer time, and where more of the miracles were narrated for public information, there are incomparably more.


I think my point is made. I would not be at all surprised if you could find the odd early Christian somewhere who thought that miracles of the old style (not just speaking in tongues) had ceased with the Apostles, but the great majority of influential early Christian writers seemed to have believed that miracles were continuing in their own days just as in the first days of the Church, even if (as Augustine argues) such modern miracles did not always get the publicity of those in the Gospels and Acts.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Buffalo »

Chap wrote:Yet again, I have this feeling that I read the Bible more than Hoops does. There is a really good precedent for saying that about deities who don't respond in times of need:

I Kings 18
22 Then Elijah said to them, “I am the only one of the LORD’s prophets left, but Baal has four hundred and fifty prophets. 23 Get two bulls for us. Let Baal’s prophets choose one for themselves, and let them cut it into pieces and put it on the wood but not set fire to it. I will prepare the other bull and put it on the wood but not set fire to it. 24 Then you call on the name of your god, and I will call on the name of the LORD. The god who answers by fire—he is God.”

Then all the people said, “What you say is good.”

25 Elijah said to the prophets of Baal, “Choose one of the bulls and prepare it first, since there are so many of you. Call on the name of your god, but do not light the fire.” 26 So they took the bull given them and prepared it.

Then they called on the name of Baal from morning till noon. “Baal, answer us!” they shouted. But there was no response; no one answered. And they danced around the altar they had made.

27 At noon Elijah began to taunt them. “Shout louder!” he said. “Surely he is a god! Perhaps he is deep in thought, or busy, or traveling. Maybe he is sleeping and must be awakened.” 28 So they shouted louder and slashed themselves with swords and spears, as was their custom, until their blood flowed. 29 Midday passed, and they continued their frantic prophesying until the time for the evening sacrifice. But there was no response, no one answered, no one paid attention.


What's sauce for the Baal is sauce for the Yahweh, no?


Zing!
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Chap »

By the way, it occurs to me that my post with the long quote from Augustine, and some of its predecessors, may be causing puzzlement along the lines of

"WTF? Chap, a self-admitted atheist, is posting reams of stuff from early Christian writers giving accounts of miracles, and pointing to the fact that the people who gave those accounts do not appear to be have been illiterate and credulous peasants, but were amongst the better-educated and cutting-edge Christian leaders of their time. Does he believe in that stuff, then?"

In fact what I am doing is trying to counter an argument by Hoops along the following lines:

1. Miracles in the early Church were designed by 'God' for a very limited purpose - pointing to the special role of Jesus, and enabling the church to be established and the Biblical canon fixed. 'God' then more or less turned off the miracle tap. (This is the so-called 'Cessationist' position).

2. Therefore it is unreasonable to complain that 'God' does not respond to the prayers of people in danger today by performing a miraculous rescue.

On the contrary, I have pointed out that the Cessationist position is greatly weakened by the fact that the generality of Christians continued to take the occurrence of miracles in their day as normal, long after the date (AD 350) for their cessation given by Hoops. There is little or no sign of any consciousness that miracles had, in general, ceased.

(My interpretation of this evidence is that even the most educated and literate people will, with surprising ease, believe in stuff that didn't happen. But that is not the point in this thread.)
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _subgenius »

Panopticon wrote:“The parents and their three children -- all 2 or under, including one buckled in a car seat -- held hands on the hallway floor of their neighbor's mobile home, praying.....

I wonder how anyone knew this was what occurred?
I have suspicions about the surviving Jason Miller, the only survivor and the man who allegedly invited them into his double-wide trailer under the guise that it was "safer" in there. Is he the one who accounted this tale? Sounds like he is simply covering up a more nefarious story.....
On the other hand...maybe they all were just praying for his survival...at which case success!

All in all, if you can't see the wisdom in this, this it is because you don't know what wisdom is.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Chap »

subgenius wrote:
Panopticon wrote:“The parents and their three children -- all 2 or under, including one buckled in a car seat -- held hands on the hallway floor of their neighbor's mobile home, praying.....

I wonder how anyone knew this was what occurred?
I have suspicions about the surviving Jason Miller, the only survivor and the man who allegedly invited them into his double-wide trailer under the guise that it was "safer" in there. Is he the one who accounted this tale? Sounds like he is simply covering up a more nefarious story.....
On the other hand...maybe they all were just praying for his survival...at which case success!

All in all, if you can't see the wisdom in this, this it is because you don't know what wisdom is.


This post has to be satirical in intent.

I mean, it has to be.

Pretty please?

Or maybe not ... subgenius has figured out (or maybe Someone Up There has told him) that this family were really about to sacrifice their children to Satan, when The Big Guy in the Sky stepped in with an instant tornado and put a stop to it. So the parents were punished, and the innocent children were saved from Satan's clutches (but only just!!!!!) and are now in the CK.

No wonder this evil devil-spawn Jason made up the stuff about 'praying' - 'cept he didn't say who they were praying to ...

That's wisdom for you, if only you can see it.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_consiglieri
_Emeritus
Posts: 6186
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _consiglieri »

Hoops wrote:There's no such thing as apostolic succession. The Bible speaks of no mmechanism by which the authority of the apostles to establish the church can be passed on to another.


The first chapter of Acts would beg to differ.
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
Post Reply