Tobin wrote:Yep, it's called faith. It is kind of a requirement. You need some to believe in this whole God thing.Chap wrote:...
But how do you know which of the very wide choice of deities you are supposed to have faith in?
Tobin wrote:Yep, it's called faith. It is kind of a requirement. You need some to believe in this whole God thing.Chap wrote:...
Not really. I just don't put up with ridiculous demands from people that don't really know much about anything. The idea that we can identify ancient cities with no independent documents or landmarks is patently absurd. People that make such demands are even more so.Chap wrote:Errm, I think Tobin has forgotten that the topic is MesoAmerican archeology?
Tobin wrote:Yep, it's called faith. It is kind of a requirement. You need some to believe in this whole God thing.Chap wrote:...
You have to have faith that God has certain characteristics such a omnipotence for example. Actually, it isn't really a matter of faith. It is pretty stupid to believe in a God that isn't omnipotent. What use would such a God be? None at all.Chap wrote:But how do you know which of the very wide choice of deities you are supposed to have faith in?
Tobin wrote:Not really. I just don't put up with ridiculous demands from people that don't really know much about anything. The idea that we can identify ancient cities with no independent documents or landmarks is patently absurd. People that make such demand are even more so.Chap wrote:Errm, I think Tobin has forgotten that the topic is MesoAmerican archeology?
On that we can agree. I believe it is, at this point, ultimately pointless. They need to find:Chap wrote:So Mormons will have to give up the idea of finding support for the Book of Mormon from MesoAmerican archeology?
Fine by me.
Tobin wrote:[You have to have faith that God has certain characteristics such a omnipotence for example. Actually, it isn't really a matter of faith. It is pretty stupid to believe in a God that isn't omnipotent. What use would such a God be? None at all.
You are wrong about that. Most of the world believes in a supreme being for the most part. They just believe different things about him. Only a very small fraction of people in the world actually do not believe (3-7%).Chap wrote:Tobin wrote:[You have to have faith that God has certain characteristics such a omnipotence for example. Actually, it isn't really a matter of faith. It is pretty stupid to believe in a God that isn't omnipotent. What use would such a God be? None at all.
Uh-huh. So the only deity whose existence is likely is one that makes sense to the tiny speck of temporarily animated matter known on this board as 'Tobin'. Accept no other brands, including presumably the useless Mormon one, who can't create matter but has to make do with whatever he can find lying around 'unorganized'.
Sounds very reasonable to me.
Tobin wrote:That is one of the beautiful things about Christianity. It has always been proven true in the studies that have not been written, research that has not been conducted and archeological evidence that has not been dug. - Tobin
A: Jerusalem.
* Buffalo climbs out on limb *
* Buffalo saws off limb *
* Buffalo crashes to ground *
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
They may also call him by different names.Tobin wrote:You are wrong about that. Most of the world believes in a supreme being for the most part. They just believe different things about him.
Actually, we have two records of groups described precisely like that. The Book of Mormon people and the New Testament saints.Buffalo wrote:But there's no evidence that any city found thus far is in any way associated with a group from Palestine that worshiped Christ.